CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Philosophy › What happened to Bon-ton?

What happened to Bon-ton?

Started by gentlescout70 · · 👁 9 views · 52 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants gentlescout70rustymaker5Anthony Anderson91Keith Lee2Megan White4Jonathan Brooks8Peter Phillips32Elizabeth Bennett86Sean Fox6dustyangler43Mark Torres14Sam Rivera4Alexander Lewisdriftingtrucker4Edward Flores4fadedgardener15William Gonzalez3Rebecca Rivera2Olivia Evans8Roger Cook6Jacob Jackson50Gregory Nelson
Rebecca Rivera2 Rebecca Rivera2 Member
15 messages
joined Mar 2009
#41 ·
Olivia Evans8 said:OMG, if you don't want to do that, just leave! I mean, which part of that is confusing? If a company does exactly what you hate, why on earth would you still want to work there? Just start your own business where none of that nonsense exists! Just don't go forcing everyone else to deal with your standards when they're just trying to run their business.

If everything is truly the same everywhere (and let's be real, it's not—that's just lazy thinking), then maybe the job you think you have isn't actually a real profession anymore, but just some cheap, watered-down version of it. Either way, if you're not feeling it,
just walk away...
Anyway, this is getting pretty off-topic, but the whole point the person who triggered you made—which is what I'm trying to get across—is that you have the freedom and the right to just bail from an environment that doesn't suit you.

Sure. The media isn't making people stupider at all—because if they were, there wouldn't be any consequences for their influence on society, and I'd just be making things up. And if I haven't made them up, then moving out of the country isn't "pressure"—it's just a lack of pressure. 🙄

What's actually relevant here is that certain rules of etiquette (not all of them, mind you) are quite logical in my view.
Modern social standards are frequently shaped by the media; essentially: the dumber and more mindless the content, the better. That's what's "in" right now, and if you can't stomach it, you're "out"—and of course, you're free to emigrate.

_
Edward Flores4 Edward Flores4 Regular
428 messages
joined Mar 2008
#42 ·
Olivia Evans8 said:OMG, if you don't want to do that, just leave! I mean, which part of that is confusing? If a company does exactly what you hate, why on earth would you still want to work there? Just start your own business where none of that nonsense exists! Just don't go forcing everyone else to deal with your standards when they're just trying to run their business.

If everything is truly the same everywhere (and let's be real, it's not—that's just lazy thinking), then maybe the job you think you have isn't actually a real profession anymore, but just some cheap, watered-down version of it. Either way, if you're not feeling it,
just walk away...
Anyway, this is getting pretty off-topic, but the whole point the person who triggered you made—which is what I'm trying to get across—is that you have the freedom and the right to just bail from an environment that doesn't suit you.

Man, what a tired cliché. 🙄

Let's be real for a second—walking away is just running away. And look, my friend Caveman—someone who runs is anything but free!
Roger Cook6 Roger Cook6 Newcomer
2 messages
joined May 2009
#43 ·
I think the old code of conduct has faded away, much like the ancient Greeks. It’s like a language—it evolves; it isn't some fixed constant. The way people carry themselves today doesn't show nearly as much respect for others as it did sixty years ago. Then again, what we saw sixty years ago is nothing compared to the standards of Antiquity, and it's lightyears better than the Middle Ages, when people just burned everything down without a second thought for human life or property.
The current stage is just where we are, and eventually, things will swing back the other way—for better or worse.
That's why you just have to accept the present reality; those "good old days" are nothing more than memories for the people who actually lived through them.🙂
William Gonzalez3 William Gonzalez3 Regular
276 messages
joined May 2009
#44 ·
Rebecca Rivera2 said:What you're describing actually misses the point regarding etiquette; you seem to have drifted a bit off course, haven't you? 🤷
I never had to deal with that kind of pressure when I was coming out of middle school.

Well, good for you—as an individual.

if it's the same in one city, it won't be the same in another country.

Of course, though you could always just exile yourself to Manhattan Island; as long as it doesn't feel like pressure, right? 😉

even a woman who isn't conventionally attractive could find a beach where she won't be mocked.
I know this from personal experience.
so...

That would most likely be some desolate, unkempt stretch of coastline. Back to Manhattan Island again?

there is an entire array of examples in journalism, art, and design that prove the opposite, making this a rather flimsy argument for proving your supposed "intense pressure."
Take a band like Foo Fighters, for instance; nobody forces them to churn out garbage, yet they are incredibly successful and widely listened to.
People value quality, not just mindless fluff and cheap thrills.

There are examples that are increasingly becoming exceptions, which only serves to reinforce the rule I was outlining. I could argue that point quite extensively in a different thread.
If, by sheer coincidence, the leader of the free world happens to be Chinese, you certainly can't conclude that the Chinese people, as a whole, are above average in height.

not really.
all you need is to wear clean, tidy clothes. nothing more.

That is incorrect for many professions and in many different contexts...

I’m glad to hear it.
Most companies don't operate that way—it's definitely an outlier.

I feel the same way. My old firm wasn't exactly a unicorn in that regard, but I have this nagging suspicion—based on what I've seen—that most places you'd end up working are actually quite similar to that one.

None of those rules are "natural."

All I was saying is that things like—offering a seat to a pregnant woman or an elderly person on the subway, helping a blind person cross the street, holding the door for someone loaded down with groceries, or simply wishing another human being good health... to me feels entirely instinctive. In other words, it seems perfectly logical and fundamentally human.

_

Why all the ad hominem attacks and trolling?
What I was really trying to convey to you was that subtle distinction between how social pressure used to work—back when people actually had various ways to exert it and often did so quite openly—and the way it functions today, where it seems to have dwindled down to little more than just constant condemnation and mockery.

Of course, you could always relocate to Manhattan Island—as long as it isn't done under any kind of pressure, I suppose. 😉

I’ve been thinking about this lately—and I suspect others might feel the same—but honestly, the idea that there is this massive social pressure forcing every individual to strictly adhere to traditional etiquette just doesn't seem to exist anymore. Maybe I'm being too cynical, or perhaps things have simply shifted, but that constant, heavy weight of having to perform "proper" manners to fit into society... it feels like a relic of the past. It's almost as if those unwritten rules of decorum have lost their grip on us entirely.
That’s essentially what I was getting at in my first post—and, looking back, I didn't notice anything you've said in any of your previous comments that would actually contradict my point.
It seems you’ve managed to tackle just about everything else—except for that one specific thing.

It would probably just be some lonely, unkept stretch of beach—you know, the kind where nobody really goes.

No, I wouldn't say that—it would actually end up being one of the main beaches in the area.
I would ask that you please refrain from continuing to be so obtuse about this.

I suppose we’re seeing more and more cases that look like exceptions—but, if you think about it, they actually just reinforce the very rule I was talking about.

No, I don't think they’re becoming more and more exceptions—not necessarily.
It seems to me that there’s always a fairly consistent ratio between what’s actually high-quality work and what's just pure junk—it stays about the same, I guess.
It really comes down to the individual—it’s all about the choice you make.

It seems inaccurate when applied to many job titles—and honestly, in quite a few different situations as well...

And how exactly does that have anything to do with this tragic decline in manners?

I mean, look—your company wasn't exactly an outlier, but I have this nagging fear that most businesses in the sector you seem to be operating in... well, they might be working just like yours.

I suppose they certainly are.
I mean, I suppose most people really are exactly as I described—it’s just an observation, really.

I was simply suggesting that we should be the kind of people who stand up for a pregnant woman or an elderly person on the subway—you know, those small gestures that actually matter. Maybe it’s about helping a blind person cross the street, holding the door open for someone struggling with heavy groceries, or even just wishing another human being good health. It's really just about those little moments of decency. To feels completely organic to me. In other words—it just seems entirely logical and fundamentally human.

Well, that part is definitely human.
But being human isn't limited to just that.
It’s also human to not stand up for your elders, or to not hold doors open for women, or even to not wish someone else good health.
And it's natural.
What's actually unnatural is when decent guys decide they want everyone else to be exactly like them—so they impose all these artificial rules on everyone else, forcing people to act according to those standards instead of just being themselves.
Actually, now that I think about it more carefully, even that isn't really "unnatural," because I suppose we all have this underlying desire for everyone else to be just like us—to behave the way we want and think the way we want.
That, too, is quite natural.
But it is also rude and incredibly pretentious, much like the people who try to force those expectations on others.
William Gonzalez3 William Gonzalez3 Regular
276 messages
joined May 2009
#45 ·
Edward Flores4 said:Man, what a tired cliché. 🙄

Let's be real for a second—walking away is just running away. And look, my friend Caveman—someone who runs is anything but free!


Actually, I think Cave said everything clearly in his post; he just didn't say what you've somehow twisted through mental gymnastics to make your own point.

He mentioned how any individual has the ability to leave their current company and start their own small business where they can operate according to their own rules.
Let me repeat it for you, just so you can see for yourself—since reading the top of the page seems to be a bit much for you.
OMG, if you don't want to do it, then just leave. I don't know which part of that is confusing. If a company does things you aren't interested in, why stay there? Start your own firm where none of that stuff exists, but stop trying to force everyone else to do things you don't want to do.

If everything is supposedly the same everywhere (which obviously isn't true—that's just an excuse for lazy people), then maybe the profession you're aiming for doesn't really exist, and you're just looking at some low-rent version of it. In any case, if you don't like it, just walk away.

Anyway, this is getting pretty off-topic, but the point William Gonzalez3 made—which I am also explaining—is that you have the freedom and the right to leave an environment that doesn't suit you.

If I recall correctly, you actually left your previous job to start your own company where you set the rules, so I honestly don't see what the issue is here.
No one was advocating for running away, nor were we suggesting taking the path of least resistance; it’s actually quite the opposite.
Cave was advocating for taking matters into your own hands.

So, if you could please be so kind as to stop misinterpreting things from a different thread, because it's clear we won't be discussing basic etiquette today.
Jacob Jackson50 Jacob Jackson50 Member
35 messages
joined Feb 2008
#46 ·
Everything changes, including etiquette. New rules get cooked up just so they can be broken later on.
Rebecca Rivera2 Rebecca Rivera2 Member
15 messages
joined Mar 2009
#47 ·
William Gonzalez3 said:
Why all the ad hominem attacks and trolling?
What I was really trying to convey to you was that subtle distinction between how social pressure used to work—back when people actually had various ways to exert it and often did so quite openly—and the way it functions today, where it seems to have dwindled down to little more than just constant condemnation and mockery.

Of course, you could always relocate to Manhattan Island—as long as it isn't done under any kind of pressure, I suppose. 😉

I’ve been thinking about this lately—and I suspect others might feel the same—but honestly, the idea that there is this massive social pressure forcing every individual to strictly adhere to traditional etiquette just doesn't seem to exist anymore. Maybe I'm being too cynical, or perhaps things have simply shifted, but that constant, heavy weight of having to perform "proper" manners to fit into society... it feels like a relic of the past. It's almost as if those unwritten rules of decorum have lost their grip on us entirely.
That’s essentially what I was getting at in my first post—and, looking back, I didn't notice anything you've said in any of your previous comments that would actually contradict my point.
It seems you’ve managed to tackle just about everything else—except for that one specific thing.

It would probably just be some lonely, unkept stretch of beach—you know, the kind where nobody really goes.

No, I wouldn't say that—it would actually end up being one of the main beaches in the area.
I would ask that you please refrain from continuing to be so obtuse about this.

I suppose we’re seeing more and more cases that look like exceptions—but, if you think about it, they actually just reinforce the very rule I was talking about.

No, I don't think they’re becoming more and more exceptions—not necessarily.
It seems to me that there’s always a fairly consistent ratio between what’s actually high-quality work and what's just pure junk—it stays about the same, I guess.
It really comes down to the individual—it’s all about the choice you make.

It seems inaccurate when applied to many job titles—and honestly, in quite a few different situations as well...

And how exactly does that have anything to do with this tragic decline in manners?

I mean, look—your company wasn't exactly an outlier, but I have this nagging fear that most businesses in the sector you seem to be operating in... well, they might be working just like yours.

I suppose they certainly are.
I mean, I suppose most people really are exactly as I described—it’s just an observation, really.

I was simply suggesting that we should be the kind of people who stand up for a pregnant woman or an elderly person on the subway—you know, those small gestures that actually matter. Maybe it’s about helping a blind person cross the street, holding the door open for someone struggling with heavy groceries, or even just wishing another human being good health. It's really just about those little moments of decency. To feels completely organic to me. In other words—it just seems entirely logical and fundamentally human.

Well, that part is definitely human.
But being human isn't limited to just that.
It’s also human to not stand up for your elders, or to not hold doors open for women, or even to not wish someone else good health.
And it's natural.
What's actually unnatural is when decent guys decide they want everyone else to be exactly like them—so they impose all these artificial rules on everyone else, forcing people to act according to those standards instead of just being themselves.
Actually, now that I think about it more carefully, even that isn't really "unnatural," because I suppose we all have this underlying desire for everyone else to be just like us—to behave the way we want and think the way we want.
That, too, is quite natural.
But it is also rude and incredibly pretentious, much like the people who try to force those expectations on others.

It isn't an ad hominem; I am merely noting that you seem to have lost the thread of your own argument by masking what is essentially a witch hunt under the guise of "etiquette," all in an attempt to prove how coercive and harmful such formalities can be.

Quincy:
No, it wouldn't be; rather, it would be one of the main beaches in that area.
And I’d appreciate it if you didn't keep being obtuse about it.
Look, you could call my own post "obtuse" if you like, but if you aren't looking for a real answer, why bother posting at all? 🤷 In any case, you haven't actually provided anything concrete, offered any real arguments, or even said anything that sounds remotely logical.

Quincy:
No, they aren't becoming more frequent exceptions.
On average, the ratio of quality content to total garbage remains constant.
It’s up to the individual to choose.
There is no inherent mechanism that regulates a steady ratio between high-quality content and pure junk. Junk is easy and fast to produce, and it doesn't last long. For a consumerist mindset and under the reign of neoliberal capitalism, almost any piece of trash is a highly profitable product. Furthermore, it is significantly easier to dull people's wits than to enlighten them, which creates a perfectly logical causal link between intellectual stagnation, the mass production of cheap filler, and the successful sale of that very same filler.

Quincy:
And what exactly does that have to do with the tragic disappearance of etiquette?
It has everything to do with current social pressures and the active dulling of the public mind—as well as the desire of certain groups to force those who don't conform to just leave.

Quincy:
Well, that's just human nature.
But that isn't the only thing that's human.
It is also human to stand up for an elderly person or hold a door for a woman, and to genuinely wish others good health.
It's just natural.
Oh, bravo. Personally, I'd much rather offer my seat to a pregnant woman or a senior on an MTA bus out of "old-fashioned" courtesy than try to be "hip" according to the standards of some tacky cable network or whatever other mindless media outlet is trending.

And yes, I will still end by wishing you good health, regardless of how much that might irritate you. 🤣 😁

_
Rebecca Rivera2 Rebecca Rivera2 Member
15 messages
joined Mar 2009
#48 ·
William Gonzalez3 said:Actually, I think Cave said everything clearly in his post; he just didn't say what you've somehow twisted through mental gymnastics to make your own point.

He mentioned how any individual has the ability to leave their current company and start their own small business where they can operate according to their own rules.
Let me repeat it for you, just so you can see for yourself—since reading the top of the page seems to be a bit much for you.
OMG, if you don't want to do it, then just leave. I don't know which part of that is confusing. If a company does things you aren't interested in, why stay there? Start your own firm where none of that stuff exists, but stop trying to force everyone else to do things you don't want to do.

If everything is supposedly the same everywhere (which obviously isn't true—that's just an excuse for lazy people), then maybe the profession you're aiming for doesn't really exist, and you're just looking at some low-rent version of it. In any case, if you don't like it, just walk away.

Anyway, this is getting pretty off-topic, but the point William Gonzalez3 made—which I am also explaining—is that you have the freedom and the right to leave an environment that doesn't suit you.

If I recall correctly, you actually left your previous job to start your own company where you set the rules, so I honestly don't see what the issue is here.
No one was advocating for running away, nor were we suggesting taking the path of least resistance; it’s actually quite the opposite.
Cave was advocating for taking matters into your own hands.

So, if you could please be so kind as to stop misinterpreting things from a different thread, because it's clear we won't be discussing basic etiquette today.

Cave said that vague nonsense while responding to my example about a journalist being pressured to write sensationalist tabloid trash. It’s the same story at any other news outlet out there...

So, what would you actually do in that situation? Start a freelance consultancy? 🤣 Get real.

And journalism wasn't even the only option—I could have used plenty of other professional examples...
William Gonzalez3 William Gonzalez3 Regular
276 messages
joined May 2009
#49 ·
Rebecca Rivera2 said:It isn't an ad hominem; I am merely noting that you seem to have lost the thread of your own argument by masking what is essentially a witch hunt under the guise of "etiquette," all in an attempt to prove how coercive and harmful such formalities can be.

Quincy:
No, it wouldn't be; rather, it would be one of the main beaches in that area.
And I’d appreciate it if you didn't keep being obtuse about it.
Look, you could call my own post "obtuse" if you like, but if you aren't looking for a real answer, why bother posting at all? 🤷 In any case, you haven't actually provided anything concrete, offered any real arguments, or even said anything that sounds remotely logical.

Quincy:
No, they aren't becoming more frequent exceptions.
On average, the ratio of quality content to total garbage remains constant.
It’s up to the individual to choose.
There is no inherent mechanism that regulates a steady ratio between high-quality content and pure junk. Junk is easy and fast to produce, and it doesn't last long. For a consumerist mindset and under the reign of neoliberal capitalism, almost any piece of trash is a highly profitable product. Furthermore, it is significantly easier to dull people's wits than to enlighten them, which creates a perfectly logical causal link between intellectual stagnation, the mass production of cheap filler, and the successful sale of that very same filler.

Quincy:
And what exactly does that have to do with the tragic disappearance of etiquette?
It has everything to do with current social pressures and the active dulling of the public mind—as well as the desire of certain groups to force those who don't conform to just leave.

Quincy:
Well, that's just human nature.
But that isn't the only thing that's human.
It is also human to stand up for an elderly person or hold a door for a woman, and to genuinely wish others good health.
It's just natural.
Oh, bravo. Personally, I'd much rather offer my seat to a pregnant woman or a senior on an MTA bus out of "old-fashioned" courtesy than try to be "hip" according to the standards of some tacky cable network or whatever other mindless media outlet is trending.

And yes, I will still end by wishing you good health, regardless of how much that might irritate you. 🤣 😁

_

As I mentioned before, I was really just trying to illustrate the types of coercive methods society used to have at its disposal.
What I brought up was one way society might attempt to force the "flock" into line—methods that were actually utilized back then.
Regarding etiquette, I suppose we should consider what happened to those who refused to follow the established norms and rules?
So, I’m not claiming people were being burned at the stake, but I am suggesting they faced consequences far more severe than what we see today; they were essentially forced to adhere to etiquette through much harsher pressure, whereas that kind of pressure doesn't exist anymore.

Look, you can call your own post "obtuse" if you like, but if you aren't looking for an answer, why even write? 🤷 🤷 Regardless, you haven't actually provided any concrete points or arguments.

Actually, I think I did provide something concrete.
I told you about someone I know who refuses to shave and goes to the beach unshaven.
The main beach, mind you.
And nobody dares say a word to them.

It's about current social pressure and the way people are being conditioned. It also ties into the desire—for some, at least—to push out anyone who doesn't conform.

I’ve already explained that I wasn't advocating for running away, but rather for taking matters into one's own hands.
But, in any case, it seems you agree that this has nothing to do with actual etiquette.

Well, good for you. Personally, I’d much rather give up my seat for a pregnant woman or an elderly person on a subway based on "old school" manners than try to be "trendy" by the standards of some MTV or other similar media outlet.

Now this is just trolling, and honestly, I'm starting to feel like there isn't much point in continuing this discussion.
If you haven't noticed, I wasn't arguing against giving up seats to seniors on the bus, nor was I against holding doors open for women; I was simply stating that both are natural behaviors.
Either you aren't understanding me, or perhaps you just don't want to.
Rebecca Rivera2 Rebecca Rivera2 Member
15 messages
joined Mar 2009
#50 ·
I suppose I should have expected this kind of reaction—it’s almost predictable at this point. One tries to offer a nuanced perspective on the matter, only to be met with the usual wall of noise. It’s fascinating, really, how quickly a civil discussion can devolve into this sort of thing when people prefer certainty over complexity. It reminds me of those old debates you'd see on early internet forums—lots of posturing, very little substance, and an almost theatrical commitment to being wrong. But then again, perhaps that's just the nature of the beast. kaže:
I certainly did—I laid out some very specific points.
I've already told you—I happen to know someone who doesn't bother with shaving and just rolls up to the beach completely unshaven.
The main beach.
And honestly, nobody even dares to cross her.
I’m sorry that didn't click for you right out of the gate—but there it is.

It isn’t a matter of whether I can follow your logic—I certainly can—but rather a question of how much anyone is actually going to buy what you're selling.

At this point, it feels like we’ve drifted straight into trolling territory—and frankly, I’m starting to wonder if there’s even any real point in dragging this debate out any further.
In case you didn't catch my drift—and I suspect you might have missed the nuance here—I wasn’t exactly campaigning for the elderly to be ignored on the subway, nor was I suggesting we slam the doors in women's faces. My point was much simpler, if perhaps a bit more clinical: I was merely observing that both behaviors are perfectly natural human tendencies.
It’s one of two things—either you simply lack the capacity to understand me, or you’re making a very conscious, very deliberate choice to ignore what I'm saying.

I follow your logic, I really do—but you’re essentially downplaying the very real pressures we're seeing right now, specifically regarding how much society is being desensitized. You stretched your "civility" so thin that by bringing up lynchings in your thirty-eighth post, you actually crossed the line from debate into straight-up trolling.
In any case, Well, hello there. I honestly don't wish you good health, nor any other kind of well-being—not even a shred of it.
I don't want anything from you.

Why did you even bother with the pleasantries? If you were going to commit to a specific tone for this entire post, why abandon it halfway through just to be polite? You might as well have stayed consistent with the rest of your argument—it would have been much more coherent. 🤷

I... that specific point of mine—the one that completely contradicts everything you just laid out in your previous post—you didn't even bother to address. But fine, whatever.

Rebecca Rivera2 said:It isn't an ad hominem; I am merely noting that you seem to have lost the thread of your own argument by masking what is essentially a witch hunt under the guise of "etiquette," all in an attempt to prove how coercive and harmful such formalities can be.

Quincy:
No, it wouldn't be; rather, it would be one of the main beaches in that area.
And I’d appreciate it if you didn't keep being obtuse about it.
Look, you could call my own post "obtuse" if you like, but if you aren't looking for a real answer, why bother posting at all? 🤷 In any case, you haven't actually provided anything concrete, offered any real arguments, or even said anything that sounds remotely logical.

Quincy:
No, they aren't becoming more frequent exceptions.
On average, the ratio of quality content to total garbage remains constant.
It’s up to the individual to choose.
There is no inherent mechanism that regulates a steady ratio between high-quality content and pure junk. Junk is easy and fast to produce, and it doesn't last long. For a consumerist mindset and under the reign of neoliberal capitalism, almost any piece of trash is a highly profitable product. Furthermore, it is significantly easier to dull people's wits than to enlighten them, which creates a perfectly logical causal link between intellectual stagnation, the mass production of cheap filler, and the successful sale of that very same filler.

Quincy:
And what exactly does that have to do with the tragic disappearance of etiquette?
It has everything to do with current social pressures and the active dulling of the public mind—as well as the desire of certain groups to force those who don't conform to just leave.

Quincy:
Well, that's just human nature.
But that isn't the only thing that's human.
It is also human to stand up for an elderly person or hold a door for a woman, and to genuinely wish others good health.
It's just natural.
Oh, bravo. Personally, I'd much rather offer my seat to a pregnant woman or a senior on an MTA bus out of "old-fashioned" courtesy than try to be "hip" according to the standards of some tacky cable network or whatever other mindless media outlet is trending.

And yes, I will still end by wishing you good health, regardless of how much that might irritate you. 🤣 😁

_

There is simply no built-in mechanism to maintain any kind of equilibrium between genuine, high-quality content and the endless stream of absolute garbage flooding the market. Junk is easy—it’s fast to manufacture, cheap to distribute, and it burns out just as quickly as it arrived. In a landscape driven by a consumerist mindset and unchecked, laissez-faire capitalism, almost any piece of low-grade trash can be marketed as a "must-have" product. Beyond that, there is the uncomfortable reality of human nature: it is far easier to dull the senses of the masses than it is to enlighten them. Therefore, there is a perfectly logical, direct causal link between the systematic numbing of the public and the massive commercial success of producing nothing but cheap, disposable filler.[/I]

The scenario I’ve laid out here represents what we are seeing today—a massive amount of social pressure being funneled toward anyone who refuses to accept a culture where apathy has become the "new normal."

The "old school" etiquette used to feel more like a mild seasonal cold—annoying, sure, but manageable—and as I mentioned earlier, in certain contexts, it actually feels quite intuitive and natural.

_
Edward Flores4 Edward Flores4 Regular
428 messages
joined Mar 2008
#51 ·
William Gonzalez3 said:Actually, I think Cave said everything clearly in his post; he just didn't say what you've somehow twisted through mental gymnastics to make your own point.

He mentioned how any individual has the ability to leave their current company and start their own small business where they can operate according to their own rules.
Let me repeat it for you, just so you can see for yourself—since reading the top of the page seems to be a bit much for you.
OMG, if you don't want to do it, then just leave. I don't know which part of that is confusing. If a company does things you aren't interested in, why stay there? Start your own firm where none of that stuff exists, but stop trying to force everyone else to do things you don't want to do.

If everything is supposedly the same everywhere (which obviously isn't true—that's just an excuse for lazy people), then maybe the profession you're aiming for doesn't really exist, and you're just looking at some low-rent version of it. In any case, if you don't like it, just walk away.

Anyway, this is getting pretty off-topic, but the point William Gonzalez3 made—which I am also explaining—is that you have the freedom and the right to leave an environment that doesn't suit you.

If I recall correctly, you actually left your previous job to start your own company where you set the rules, so I honestly don't see what the issue is here.
No one was advocating for running away, nor were we suggesting taking the path of least resistance; it’s actually quite the opposite.
Cave was advocating for taking matters into your own hands.

So, if you could please be so kind as to stop misinterpreting things from a different thread, because it's clear we won't be discussing basic etiquette today.

Freedom and running a corporation are kind of like life and death, or day and night. You’re "free" to be a slave to profits, to regulations, to taxes, and to whatever else people demand from you. You’re "free" to be a materialistic jerk and live off the backs of your workers, all while hiding under the protection of laws that have been written for generations by the most ambitious, greedy corporate types—people who haven't given a second thought to honesty, ethics, morality, equality, or fairness.

Money makes the world go round... right?

Without that setup, you're only "free" to rent yourself out for a paycheck, because every other way of surviving is effectively outlawed.

Anyway... no matter which version you use when you claim someone is "free to leave," it's clearly just a case of double-speak designed to mask the reality of coercion. It’s exactly like how the term "free market" actually translates to irresponsible and cutthroat business practices.
Gregory Nelson Gregory Nelson Newcomer
9 messages
joined May 2008
#52 ·
gentlescout70 said:Where on earth has all sense of decorum vanished to? I find myself wondering about the younger generation and even their parents, who seem increasingly unable—or perhaps simply unwilling—to instill even the slightest shred of etiquette in them, mostly because they themselves have lost touch with those very standards, even though such rules naturally shift depending on whether you're in Chicago or New York. When I speak of this disappearance, I don't mean that manners have been wiped off the face of the earth entirely, but rather that they have become an exceedingly rare commodity. Why has it become the accepted norm to act with total disregard for social graces, only to have the person actually trying to behave properly met with judgmental glares? This topic touches upon more than just the decline of politeness; from my perspective, it encompasses the vanishing of all those subtle, beautiful elements of life that we simply don't value anymore—everything from the quality of music to how one chooses to spend their day, right down to the most minute details of social conduct. It seems that for the vast majority, superficial, low-quality nonsense holds far more weight than anything possessing actual substance. For instance, why bother hosting a major tennis tournament in Paris if the crowd lacks the basic decency to remain quiet during a game? Why is aggressive behavior tolerated so easily now? Why is it considered acceptable for historic downtown districts to be defaced by graffiti, or for counterfeit Ralph Lauren goods to flood the market and be purchased by people who wouldn't know the real thing if it hit them? I could go on forever. Honestly, it feels as though we are overdue for a comet to sweep through and thin out ninety percent of the population. Perhaps since the masses refuse to appreciate true quality, those of us who still do can take solace in our small numbers, but one has to wonder... why...

I suspect the reason lies in the dwindling readership of classic etiquette manuals like Emily Post's; apparently, nobody wants to be a "proper" kid by following a hundred different lessons. I was fortunate enough to read such a book as a child, which explains why I still maintain some semblance of decency.

When I say it has disappeared, I don't mean it has ceased to exist entirely, but rather that it has become an exceedingly rare commodity.

And what exactly do you include under the umbrella of etiquette?

Why has it become acceptable to act against all social decorum, only to have the person actually following the rules looked at as if they were the problem?

Because being polite isn't considered "cool" anymore. And kids, unfortunately, prioritize being cool above all else.

Where have all the simple beauties of life gone? From music to how one chooses to spend their day, down to the smallest details of etiquette—it feels like none of it is valued anymore.

How could music have simply vanished? Or the various ways people choose to live their lives? That seems a bit hyperbolic.

For most people, superficial and low-quality things hold more value than anything truly worthwhile.

That shouldn't necessarily be a bad thing; it means there's less competition and more breathing room to enjoy the truly valuable things.

Why bother hosting a major tennis tournament in Paris if the crowd lacks the discipline to remain quiet during a match?

So that the head umpire finally earns his paycheck by having to constantly remind everyone to shut up.

Why has it become normal to tolerate aggressive behavior?

Because tolerance is often the path of least resistance, and besides, being tolerant is generally considered a virtue.

Why is it considered perfectly acceptable for the historic downtown core to be covered in graffiti?

Because a writer isn't truly a writer if they aren't leaving their mindless little tags all over the concrete jungle. It’s the fourth element of hip-hop—it's just part of the culture. 🙂
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpCnhtY2Pp8

Why do counterfeit Lacoste products even exist?

To make a quick buck, obviously.

Why would anyone actually buy them?

I can't say for certain, but it's likely because they're half the price...

Honestly, I think we need a comet to strike us and wipe out 90% of the population.

And leave behind only the 10% who actually follow basic social etiquette? I can already see the sequel being written—something like "Etiquette 3: How to Avoid Getting Hit by a Comet in 80 Lessons." "bonton 3: kako da izbjegnem to da budem pogođen/a kometom u 80 lekcija".
gentlescout70 gentlescout70 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined May 2009
#53 ·
What an absolute legend

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads