Interpol: Criminal Complaint Filed Against the Global Elite

The force driving us through this global economic and political machine—constantly and intentionally steering us from one disaster to the next for its own benefit—is nothing less than a criminal organization.

This serves as a formal criminal complaint against the global elite due to crime against humanity.

I am also filing this report on a second count: international law enforcement agencies have willfully turned a blind eye to the largest financial heist in history.

In any of my recent documentation, I have explicitly stated that I was not born in the USA. The reason is simple: the USA as we once knew it is dead.
On Federal Reserve banknotes, it is publicly declared that God exists.
There is no doubt that an omnipotent and omnipresent figure is woven into this narrative. Therefore, I am reporting God as a missing person.
After how much time is a missing person officially declared dead?

The global elite utilizes debt-based currency as a weapon of mass destruction.
It is mathematically impossible for a few months of money creation (debt) to ever repay 300 years of accumulated "wealth" built on that same debt.

This explains why, despite having more money circulating today than at any other point in history—and despite the massive surge in liquidity over just the last few months—we find ourselves facing the greatest crisis in human history.

As Prof. Giacinto Auriti has noted:
"If we fail to establish who owns money at the very moment it is issued, we cannot even distinguish between creditor and debtor. This highlights the severity of legal deficiencies that can no longer be tolerated.
"Debt-based money" is the tool exploiters have used to become the puppet masters of history.
In reality, people have been turned into nothing more than cash cows.
The banking system drains society and forces it into indebtedness by lending people what actually belongs to them."

Full web version available here:

To Interpol: Criminal Complaint Against the Global Elite Due to Crime Against Humanity

.

Interesting take. When we need cash for a war, a car, a house, or a new TV, we don't give a damn what we're signing—we'd basically sign away the whole country if it meant getting paid.

But the second it’s time to actually pay off those debts? Suddenly, everyone starts calling it a criminal organization. 😁

restlesscrane152 said:Interesting take. When we need cash for a war, a car, a house, or a new TV, we don't give a damn what we're signing—we'd basically sign away the whole country if it meant getting paid.

But the second it’s time to actually pay off those debts? Suddenly, everyone starts calling it a criminal organization. 😁

It’s a pretty interesting perspective, I suppose. When it’s time to hand out bonuses, executive perks, and all that other stuff, banks claim they're strictly private entities. But the second those banks start failing, the government steps in to bail them out—meaning we all foot the bill. And at that point, it’s suddenly not a criminal organization anymore...

wiredpilot15 said:It’s a pretty interesting perspective, I suppose. When it’s time to hand out bonuses, executive perks, and all that other stuff, banks claim they're strictly private entities. But the second those banks start failing, the government steps in to bail them out—meaning we all foot the bill. And at that point, it’s suddenly not a criminal organization anymore...

Either the government bails them out, or they end up paying social security to tens of thousands of people who lose their jobs when those banks collapse. Do the math. 🙂

That’s what they call a free market, restlesscrane152

markotros, if you ask me, I’d let those banks go belly up and let the competition scoop up the pieces. But hey, as a taxpayer, I really don't want tens of thousands of people losing their jobs and dumping all that weight on the government—that's the real kicker.

I bet some of those politicians who voted for the bank bailouts feel the same way. They probably realized their voters wouldn't be thrilled about carrying more dead weight, so they just went with the lesser of two evils.

That is true. One must simply acknowledge that, in the short term—over the next few months or perhaps a year—this acts as a lesser evil to stabilize the situation. But looking at the long term? It is national suicide. By that, I mean within a two to five-year window.

Not even close. The government’s probably just gonna sell off the banks to private equity once this crisis blows over to claw back the cash.

But the real kicker is the message they're sending—basically, "it's fine to screw things up because the government will just bail you out of the mess later."

But let’s be realistic here. Do you honestly believe there will be private investors willing to step in and buy these banks? Ever? Not until the economy actually recovers.
Go ahead and start a poll on the stocks subforum. Ask people when they think the Nasdaq will hit 5,000 again. Give them whatever options you want, but include "more than 20 years" as one choice and watch what happens. 99% of them will pick that. Or better yet, ask them when they think the S&P 500 will return to its old peak of 14,000. I guarantee 99% of people will say it will take over 50 years.

In all honesty, nobody believes in a recovery anymore. That is precisely why people are saving instead of spending. They aren't buying anything, even if they have the cash and the prices look attractive. You could argue they are "punishing" the sellers because those sellers hiked up prices like fools before, and now it's clear business can be done at much lower rates. For me, it is a matter of principle. I refuse to buy a house just because banks and developers jacked up their margins and interest rates. I won't provide turnover to a predatory gang of usurers.

Now, to revisit your theory for a moment. It sounds fine if a recovery were actually imminent. However, a true recovery driven by globalization won't happen until wealth is distributed more equally across the globe. We won't see it until a small Chinese person earns the same as a German person for the same job—once you factor out shipping and tariffs. But that isn't the reality. Currently, a Chinese person might still be working for a dollar a day. That has to change first. Without that shift, there is no recovery. Both political parties can declare war or set arbitrary deadlines all they want. Until the standard of living in America goes up, this country will not see a recovery.

I guess you’ve never actually lived through a real economic meltdown in your life, which is probably why you think the world is ending right now... just sit this one out. It’s pure ignorance and a total lack of experience on your part. People like you don't deserve anything more than to lose everything on the stock market and finally learn from your own mistakes.☕

Gregory Williams7 said:But let’s be realistic here. Do you honestly believe there will be private investors willing to step in and buy these banks? Ever? Not until the economy actually recovers.
Go ahead and start a poll on the stocks subforum. Ask people when they think the Nasdaq will hit 5,000 again. Give them whatever options you want, but include "more than 20 years" as one choice and watch what happens. 99% of them will pick that. Or better yet, ask them when they think the S&P 500 will return to its old peak of 14,000. I guarantee 99% of people will say it will take over 50 years.

In all honesty, nobody believes in a recovery anymore. That is precisely why people are saving instead of spending. They aren't buying anything, even if they have the cash and the prices look attractive. You could argue they are "punishing" the sellers because those sellers hiked up prices like fools before, and now it's clear business can be done at much lower rates. For me, it is a matter of principle. I refuse to buy a house just because banks and developers jacked up their margins and interest rates. I won't provide turnover to a predatory gang of usurers.

Now, to revisit your theory for a moment. It sounds fine if a recovery were actually imminent. However, a true recovery driven by globalization won't happen until wealth is distributed more equally across the globe. We won't see it until a small Chinese person earns the same as a German person for the same job—once you factor out shipping and tariffs. But that isn't the reality. Currently, a Chinese person might still be working for a dollar a day. That has to change first. Without that shift, there is no recovery. Both political parties can declare war or set arbitrary deadlines all they want. Until the standard of living in America goes up, this country will not see a recovery.

Bailing out those banks isn't some quick short-term play—but trust me, it’s way more profitable than just throwing money at poverty!

Back to that theory of yours for a sec. It’s solid if we’re talking about a recovery happening anytime soon. But look, globalization isn't gonna fix anything until wealth is actually spread out globally. We won't see a real comeback until a Chinese person is getting paid the same as a German person for the exact same job—minus the shipping costs and tariffs. And let’s be real, that’s just not the case right now. You've still got people working for a dollar a day over there. That'll change fast, though. But without leveling that playing field? No recovery. Both sides can go to war and set whatever deadlines they want for all I care. Until America lowers its standard of living, this country isn't seeing a recovery. Period.

If that Chinese person started pulling in the same paycheck as a German person, China would be gone from the world stage overnight. All that production would just shift straight to Germany—or more likely, some other developing nation where labor is cheap. Honestly, it’s way better if that Chinese person is making a buck a day than having nothing at all or relying on a harvest.

Blaming globalization for the lack of a recovery or acting like everything hinges on some "wealth redistribution" scheme is just childish. It’s got zero connection to what’s actually going on in the world right now. Total nonsense!

redmaker33, I was active on the market when the Nasdaq was sitting at 5,000. I stayed through 4,000. I was still there when it hit 3,000, and that is exactly when I exited—just as everyone was shouting that a recovery was imminent because things simply couldn't drop any further. They argued the P/E ratio was bottomed out. Now, the Nasdaq is hovering around 1,300 with nothing but minor rallies, and if current trends hold, it’s heading toward 1,000. Earnings will eventually adjust until the P/E hits 30. Personally, I find great satisfaction in knowing I got out "on time." I will take my losses now, while you can sit around waiting thirty years for a recovery. We shall see who made the smarter move in the end.

restlesscrane152, after all the insults and condescension you've thrown my way, I refuse to respond with similar vitriol. Instead, I will attempt to explain this clearly, in the hope that you might actually grasp the concept:
If an average Chinese person earned the same as a German person, that worker would transition from a mere producer to a consumer. That consumer would then fuel the global economy just as much as the current economic superpowers do today. Manufacturing itself means absolutely nothing without CONSUMPTION. Is that clear enough, or do I need to draw a diagram? The redistribution of wealth is an unavoidable consequence of a globalized economy.

It doesn't matter. I have given up because I see there is no hope left.😉

Look, I’m expecting a recovery sometime within the next five years. You, on the other hand, at thirty years old, are just proving why you folded on the market... jumping in right when the Nasdaq was peaking with a P/E ratio north of 30...😵...it's simple....a fool learns from his own mistakes...but how do you even describe someone who refuses to learn from anyone's?🙄

Let’s take a moment to analyze this.
I first entered the Nasdaq through an ExxonMobil IPO. Since then, the index climbed toward the 5,000 mark before beginning its descent. It took me some time to realize I was looking at a bottomless pit, and I finally exited when it hit around 3,000. All told, my losses were minimal. Perhaps just one month's salary.

You bought into the Nasdaq at its peak. If you were tracking the index directly—rather than gambling on speculative stocks—you are currently sitting on a loss of somewhere between 75% and 95%.

And yet, you have the audacity to laugh at me?
Is there a flaw in my logic, or am I simply losing my mind?

🙄 I wasn't actually referring to myself in my previous post...☕

Alright everyone, it really boils down to this:
right now, you can essentially split the world into just two camps:
those who understand what’s happening, and those who don't.
At this moment, nobody can say for sure which group is larger.
These two groups represent our only two paths forward: absolute freedom, or total subjugation.

To ensure there's no confusion about why I'm posting this, why we find ourselves in this position, and what lies ahead:

Giulio Tremonti, Italian Minister of Economy and Finance:
"We are facing a crisis of monetary sovereignty!
Nations have surrendered their monetary sovereignty, replacing it with private currencies!
A currency has been created based on nothing, without any underlying value!"
ABC News - March 6, 2009.

I assume you're aware that the combined value of all the world's stock markets is roughly $50 trillion.
Just two days ago, the Wall Street Journal reported that approximately $50 trillion has effectively evaporated from the global economy.
And that's it—as Giulio Tremonti so elegantly put it, a currency based on zero.

It seems increasingly obvious to me that those who "know" are actually in the majority.
When even a high-ranking official appears on a major news network to deliver the truth—truth that 99.99% of mainstream media outlets try to bury under nonsense and trivialities—then I have no doubt we are heading in the right direction.
As the old saying goes, you can fool all of us sometimes, but you can't fool all of us all the time.

Best regards,

If you’re wondering why there seems to be no debate about what constitutes a crime and what we’re actually discussing here, I find it helpful to look at the definition. A few short lines are usually enough to open anyone's eyes:

Economics - Defining Crime

.

Gregory Williams7 said:redmaker33, I was active on the market when the Nasdaq was sitting at 5,000. I stayed through 4,000. I was still there when it hit 3,000, and that is exactly when I exited—just as everyone was shouting that a recovery was imminent because things simply couldn't drop any further. They argued the P/E ratio was bottomed out. Now, the Nasdaq is hovering around 1,300 with nothing but minor rallies, and if current trends hold, it’s heading toward 1,000. Earnings will eventually adjust until the P/E hits 30. Personally, I find great satisfaction in knowing I got out "on time." I will take my losses now, while you can sit around waiting thirty years for a recovery. We shall see who made the smarter move in the end.

restlesscrane152, after all the insults and condescension you've thrown my way, I refuse to respond with similar vitriol. Instead, I will attempt to explain this clearly, in the hope that you might actually grasp the concept:
If an average Chinese person earned the same as a German person, that worker would transition from a mere producer to a consumer. That consumer would then fuel the global economy just as much as the current economic superpowers do today. Manufacturing itself means absolutely nothing without CONSUMPTION. Is that clear enough, or do I need to draw a diagram? The redistribution of wealth is an unavoidable consequence of a globalized economy.

My bad if I offended you. But about this "consumption" thing—just think about what happens to that very same consumption if:

a) China stops being the world's cheap labor source
b) millions of Chinese people stop being the main producers and become the main consumers

And yeah, wealth redistribution is inevitable, sure, but it's happening because Western middle-class wealth is flowing straight to the East.

Not much has changed over the last 5,000 to 10,000 years.
So, everything is exactly as it should be.