CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Spirituality › Who watches the watchmen?

Who watches the watchmen?

Started by Peter Phillips32 · · 👁 10 views · 160 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Peter Phillips32amberbadger8coastalskipper92placidharbor7casualmaker13Jacob Jackson50Nicole Barrett76casualmoose82ironsailor10Kenneth Lee16Michael Anderson2Edward Flores4rowdyjackal5Alexander HallCharles Diaz56Jeffrey Gray4nimblemaker30Amy Long9Jeremy Alvarez5slydriver17jademarlin26steeleagle13dustyskipper3Brenda Cook4 …
Edward Flores4 Edward Flores4 Regular
428 messages
joined Mar 2008
#21 ·
placidharbor7 said:Here’s the thing: consciousness can’t actually be NEUTRAL, because if it isn't, it isn't really consciousness at all!
I mean, what kind of CONSCIOUSNESS exists without an "I"?
The "I" is inherently BIASED, because that very bias is exactly what constitutes the "I."
Even if you try to go out of your way to pick a side, it doesn't change the underlying BIAS—it's been there all along, running in the background.

You guys keep crying out for more "consciousness," but don't you realize you're actually just asking for more sweat and blood? You're asking for more judgment, more condemnation, and more heartache and struggle in your own lives!

Anyway, has anyone seen shamantrixx lately? Where did they disappear to?

Oh, isn't that just precious... I knew at least one of you would be a hopeless romantic😍

Until you actually get your act together—and figure out how many of you are actually "home," which one is the master, and which one is just John... Edward Flores4 is out on vacation. You can't both reach enlightenment at the same time. I can only help one of you. Make a choice... either it's you, or it's the one in charge. This PDF is way too small to accommodate both of you🙂
casualmaker13 casualmaker13 Active Member
84 messages
joined Dec 2007
#22 ·
placidharbor7 said:What people call "increased awareness" is really just an increase in thoughts, imagination, and endless overthinking. It’s just more tension, more stress, and more mental clutter...
Sure, you see more, but does that mean you see any *better*? At the end of the day, your life remains exactly the same as it was before you started overanalyzing everything.

Awareness is nothing more than simple observation without ever actually rising above the mundane, everyday grind.


You're never going to be a "master."😍
Awareness isn't about overthinking, daydreaming, or running your brain ragged—it doesn't cause stress or tension.
Having more awareness actually means having more perception, more observation, or being more alert, which I guess should make life a bit easier for any wise person.
Besides, nobody can help someone who's just stuck in the dust.😉
placidharbor7 placidharbor7 Active Member
248 messages
joined Sep 2008
#23 ·
casualmaker13 said:You're never going to be a "master."😍
Awareness isn't about overthinking, daydreaming, or running your brain ragged—it doesn't cause stress or tension.
Having more awareness actually means having more perception, more observation, or being more alert, which I guess should make life a bit easier for any wise person.
Besides, nobody can help someone who's just stuck in the dust.😉

But look, if we're going to have a real, deep conversation about this, first explain to the master here whether these three things are actually different or if they're just different ways of saying the same thing.
Jacob Jackson50 Jacob Jackson50 Member
35 messages
joined Feb 2008
#24 ·
placidharbor7 said:And then there's this whole idea of "consciously surrendering to life."

Yeah, exactly like that.
placidharbor7 placidharbor7 Active Member
248 messages
joined Sep 2008
#25 ·
Jacob Jackson50 said:Yeah, exactly like that.


So, if that's the case, what role does consciousness actually play?
Jacob Jackson50 Jacob Jackson50 Member
35 messages
joined Feb 2008
#26 ·
placidharbor7 said:So, if that's the case, what role does consciousness actually play?

Think of consciousness as the shared interface used to communicate with the main processor.
rowdyjackal5 rowdyjackal5 Member
14 messages
joined Mar 2009
#27 ·
Peter Phillips32 As stated by:
Ladies, of course it’s possible—that's why they were phrased as declarative statements in the very first post.

It all goes back to this observation by Krishnamurti: he argues that trying to control yourself—policing your own thoughts and emotions—is actually a flawed approach. Instead, he suggests you should simply be an impartial observer. Because if you go down the path of self-control, you inevitably run into the classic paradox: who watches the watchmen? When reading his work, you can see him posing this exact question to his audience. They sit there, unable to provide an answer, and because they’re stumped, they just blindly accept his ideas as absolute truth. Rather than encouraging people to branch out into their own investigations and independent reasoning, he essentially pushes his own perspectives as the ultimate, unquestionable reality.

You really ought to read the Bhagavad Gita. Honestly, I can't recommend it enough.

In the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna tells Arjuna that you can't exactly opt out of life by doing nothing. Avoiding action doesn't grant you some kind of cosmic pass; whether you act or stay idle, you're still going to have to deal with the consequences.

Secondly, let’s be clear: "control" is a complete myth. It’s nothing more than an illusion, a trick of Maya. Prabhupada illustrates this perfectly with a great example involving the President of the United States. The President walks around thinking he’s the ultimate authority, the big boss in charge. But in reality, his "subjects"—the American people—can kick him out of office at the next election. Then, during that very election, he has to stand there promising how great he’ll be if they just vote for him again. So, the supposed "boss" is actually entirely dependent on his "subjects." It’s the same ridiculous logic you see in a household: you might think you’re the master because you control the dog, even though in reality, you're being managed by your wife, your kids, or your mother-in-law. Yet, you still cling to the delusion that you're the one in charge of the dog.
True liberation only begins when you finally accept that your sole purpose is to serve, while realizing you actually control absolutely nothing. You become a servant to a servant of a servant, and in that surrender, you find yourself serving God.

God controls everything, and every single being is accountable only to Him—and to no one else.
Peter Phillips32 Peter Phillips32 Active MemberOP
154 messages
joined May 2009
#28 ·
rowdyjackal5 said:
Peter Phillips32 As stated by:
Ladies, of course it’s possible—that's why they were phrased as declarative statements in the very first post.

It all goes back to this observation by Krishnamurti: he argues that trying to control yourself—policing your own thoughts and emotions—is actually a flawed approach. Instead, he suggests you should simply be an impartial observer. Because if you go down the path of self-control, you inevitably run into the classic paradox: who watches the watchmen? When reading his work, you can see him posing this exact question to his audience. They sit there, unable to provide an answer, and because they’re stumped, they just blindly accept his ideas as absolute truth. Rather than encouraging people to branch out into their own investigations and independent reasoning, he essentially pushes his own perspectives as the ultimate, unquestionable reality.

You really ought to read the Bhagavad Gita. Honestly, I can't recommend it enough.

In the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna tells Arjuna that you can't exactly opt out of life by doing nothing. Avoiding action doesn't grant you some kind of cosmic pass; whether you act or stay idle, you're still going to have to deal with the consequences.

Secondly, let’s be clear: "control" is a complete myth. It’s nothing more than an illusion, a trick of Maya. Prabhupada illustrates this perfectly with a great example involving the President of the United States. The President walks around thinking he’s the ultimate authority, the big boss in charge. But in reality, his "subjects"—the American people—can kick him out of office at the next election. Then, during that very election, he has to stand there promising how great he’ll be if they just vote for him again. So, the supposed "boss" is actually entirely dependent on his "subjects." It’s the same ridiculous logic you see in a household: you might think you’re the master because you control the dog, even though in reality, you're being managed by your wife, your kids, or your mother-in-law. Yet, you still cling to the delusion that you're the one in charge of the dog.
True liberation only begins when you finally accept that your sole purpose is to serve, while realizing you actually control absolutely nothing. You become a servant to a servant of a servant, and in that surrender, you find yourself serving God.

God controls everything, and every single being is accountable only to Him—and to no one else.

Look, I’ve read it. And honestly, I still think people aren't anyone's servants, nor should they ever be. We’re responsible for ourselves, period. But since there's this whole systemic thing where people get brainwashed through verbal and non-verbal conditioning to fall into line, they lose the ability to even imagine—let alone believe—how much power they actually hold within themselves. They start thinking they need some "perfect" God to map out their entire "destiny" for them.
You know what I mean? It’s not that God created man in His image; it’s more like man created God in his own idealized image.
in there, Krishna tells Arjuna that you can't just opt out of action by being inactive; you'll face consequences for doing nothing just as much as if you had acted.

Exactly. You don't need some deity to tell you that your ass is gonna hurt if you sit too long or if you don't, and then demand that because they said it, you have to bow down, follow their every word, and act like a mindless servant—or else switch gods and face eternal torment.
secondly, "control" doesn't really exist; it's just an illusion called Maya. Prabhupada explains this beautifully with an example: The President thinks he's in charge, the big boss. But his "servants"—the American people—can kick him out at the next election. So, the "boss" actually depends on his "servants." It's like thinking you're the master controlling your dog, when really your spouse, your kids, or your mother-in-law is the one actually calling the shots, yet you still cling to the idea that you're the one in control of the dog.
Liberation only comes when you realize your only job is to serve, and that you control absolutely nothing. You serve a servant of a servant of a servant, and in that way, you serve God.

The President of the United States only thinks he's in control if he's foolish enough to believe the people serve him, rather than him serving the people.
I mean, he's elected by the people, for the people.

Find a better example than that. Honestly, it looks to me like besides that little copy-paste routine from the Bhagavad Gita, you don't really have any personal logic or independent thought of your own.

The Goddess-God controls everything, and every being is accountable only to them and no one else.

Really? And who are they accountable to? Who created them? Why did they create us? And where are they even located? Why do they allow so much violence, people starving to death, or a kid beating up their grandmother? Ask them if there are other beings in the universe and why they’re avoiding us.
etc. (and I've got plenty more questions, if you can actually manage to answer the previous ones meaningfully)

And yeah, how do you even know God exists in the first place?
Are you actually thinking for yourself here, or just soaking up whatever is written in books?
Peter Phillips32 Peter Phillips32 Active MemberOP
154 messages
joined May 2009
#29 ·
placidharbor7 said:What people call "increased awareness" is really just an increase in thoughts, imagination, and endless overthinking. It’s just more tension, more stress, and more mental clutter...
Sure, you see more, but does that mean you see any *better*? At the end of the day, your life remains exactly the same as it was before you started overanalyzing everything.

Awareness is nothing more than simple observation without ever actually rising above the mundane, everyday grind.

Well, looks like we’re all running with totally different definitions of what awareness even is then. To me, it means having a clearer insight into things. By doing that, you actually grasp the reality of a situation better, which naturally leads to acting better.

Those physical cramps and tensions only exist if you're sitting there hyper-focusing on them; as for stress or tension, that's just what happens when you don't actually understand your own feelings.

But alright, let's get down to brass tacks here: according to you, what actually makes a person "better" in terms of their character, how does one actually achieve that, and how can someone genuinely improve their perspective on the world? (And please, skip the word games this time because it just makes you look like you're trying too hard to be deep—honestly, it feels like you're just dodging the question. Try to see where I'm coming from for once, since I'm the one asking here)
And what specific word would you use to describe having a sharper insight into a situation or thing?

By the way, you still haven't answered:
Why do you talk about yourself in the third person? And why are your answers always so damn short?
Alexander Hall Alexander Hall Member
38 messages
joined Oct 2005
#30 ·
Peter Phillips32 said:Well, looks like we’re all running with totally different definitions of what awareness even is then. To me, it means having a clearer insight into things. By doing that, you actually grasp the reality of a situation better, which naturally leads to acting better.

Those physical cramps and tensions only exist if you're sitting there hyper-focusing on them; as for stress or tension, that's just what happens when you don't actually understand your own feelings.

But alright, let's get down to brass tacks here: according to you, what actually makes a person "better" in terms of their character, how does one actually achieve that, and how can someone genuinely improve their perspective on the world? (And please, skip the word games this time because it just makes you look like you're trying too hard to be deep—honestly, it feels like you're just dodging the question. Try to see where I'm coming from for once, since I'm the one asking here)
And what specific word would you use to describe having a sharper insight into a situation or thing?

By the way, you still haven't answered:
Why do you talk about yourself in the third person? And why are your answers always so damn short?

I’m not sure if I phrased it poorly, but "quality" isn't something you make "more quality." If something has quality, it simply possesses it.
As for improving one's worldview, traveling to different parts of the country helps. 🙂
casualmaker13 casualmaker13 Active Member
84 messages
joined Dec 2007
#31 ·
placidharbor7 said:But look, if we're going to have a real, deep conversation about this, first explain to the master here whether these three things are actually different or if they're just different ways of saying the same thing.


= 😲
rowdyjackal5 rowdyjackal5 Member
14 messages
joined Mar 2009
#32 ·
Peter Phillips32 said:Look, I’ve read it. And honestly, I still think people aren't anyone's servants, nor should they ever be. We’re responsible for ourselves, period. But since there's this whole systemic thing where people get brainwashed through verbal and non-verbal conditioning to fall into line, they lose the ability to even imagine—let alone believe—how much power they actually hold within themselves. They start thinking they need some "perfect" God to map out their entire "destiny" for them.
You know what I mean? It’s not that God created man in His image; it’s more like man created God in his own idealized image.
in there, Krishna tells Arjuna that you can't just opt out of action by being inactive; you'll face consequences for doing nothing just as much as if you had acted.

Exactly. You don't need some deity to tell you that your ass is gonna hurt if you sit too long or if you don't, and then demand that because they said it, you have to bow down, follow their every word, and act like a mindless servant—or else switch gods and face eternal torment.
secondly, "control" doesn't really exist; it's just an illusion called Maya. Prabhupada explains this beautifully with an example: The President thinks he's in charge, the big boss. But his "servants"—the American people—can kick him out at the next election. So, the "boss" actually depends on his "servants." It's like thinking you're the master controlling your dog, when really your spouse, your kids, or your mother-in-law is the one actually calling the shots, yet you still cling to the idea that you're the one in control of the dog.
Liberation only comes when you realize your only job is to serve, and that you control absolutely nothing. You serve a servant of a servant of a servant, and in that way, you serve God.

The President of the United States only thinks he's in control if he's foolish enough to believe the people serve him, rather than him serving the people.
I mean, he's elected by the people, for the people.

Find a better example than that. Honestly, it looks to me like besides that little copy-paste routine from the Bhagavad Gita, you don't really have any personal logic or independent thought of your own.

The Goddess-God controls everything, and every being is accountable only to them and no one else.

Really? And who are they accountable to? Who created them? Why did they create us? And where are they even located? Why do they allow so much violence, people starving to death, or a kid beating up their grandmother? Ask them if there are other beings in the universe and why they’re avoiding us.
etc. (and I've got plenty more questions, if you can actually manage to answer the previous ones meaningfully)

And yeah, how do you even know God exists in the first place?
Are you actually thinking for yourself here, or just soaking up whatever is written in books?


Your way of thinking is borderline demonic: "I can do anything, and I'm accountable to no one." 👎

I am not copy-pasting anything, so don't throw false accusations my way. 👎

Asking who created God or who God is accountable to is honestly a pretty stupid question. 👎
Edward Flores4 Edward Flores4 Regular
428 messages
joined Mar 2008
#33 ·
rowdyjackal5 said:Your way of thinking is borderline demonic: "I can do anything, and I'm accountable to no one." 👎

I am not copy-pasting anything, so don't throw false accusations my way. 👎

Asking who created God or who God is accountable to is honestly a pretty stupid question. 👎

The reason it feels silly is because it points directly toward a massive gap in your own belief system—one you probably feel the need to gloss over, which is why you're looking for an excuse to dismiss the question entirely, right? ☕
rowdyjackal5 rowdyjackal5 Member
14 messages
joined Mar 2009
#34 ·
Edward Flores4 said:The reason it feels silly is because it points directly toward a massive gap in your own belief system—one you probably feel the need to gloss over, which is why you're looking for an excuse to dismiss the question entirely, right? ☕

Look, I don't get it. I believe in God, and someone else doesn't. That's fine. But I also believe that God has always existed and is infinite; therefore, asking "who created the God who has always existed" is fundamentally nonsensical within that framework. That's my context.
Edward Flores4 Edward Flores4 Regular
428 messages
joined Mar 2008
#35 ·
I’m pretty convinced that human stupidity is basically infinite—though, to be fair, I can't say for certain if it's always been this way since I wasn't around to witness the beginning of time.

In that same vein, more or less 🙄
Peter Phillips32 Peter Phillips32 Active MemberOP
154 messages
joined May 2009
#36 ·
rowdyjackal5 I can't even begin to process what rowdyjackal5 just dropped in that last comment, because honestly, it’s like trying to read a map while driving through a blizzard in the middle of a Chicago winter—just total chaos. I mean, I’m sitting here, staring at my screen, wondering if I missed a whole chapter of some epic saga or if we’re all just collectively losing our minds today. It feels like every time I think we’ve reached some kind of consensus on this topic, someone comes along and flips the table, and frankly, I’m too tired for the theatrics. You know how it is; you try to have a nuanced, thoughtful conversation, and suddenly it’s a shouting match in a crowded diner. I’m not saying I have all the answers—heaven knows I don't, and I'll be the first to admit when I'm tripping over my own feet—but there’s a certain level of logic we should probably be aiming for if we want to actually get somewhere. Anyway, I digress, which I clearly do far too often, but let's just say I'm looking at this from a completely different angle than what was suggested.
Man, your way of thinking is straight-up demonic—it’s like you’ve convinced yourself you can handle everything solo and that you don't owe a single soul any accountability. 👎

Look, you’re ultimately responsible for your own life, because that’s just how the gears turn in this world. Sure, at first, you've got your surroundings—your family, your neighborhood, whatever—shaping you and setting the stage, but eventually, you've gotta break off and stand on your own two feet. I don't know what else there is to say about it, honestly. It's pretty straightforward if you stop overthinking it.
Look, if some people are too lazy to actually put in the mental heavy lifting or just sit on their hands instead of doing the work, that’s honestly on them. It’s their own damn problem to deal with. There isn't some shadowy puppet master pulling all the strings behind the scenes, and there isn't some big boss or authority figure who's going to step in and take the fall for your choices or your thoughts. At the end of the day, you’re the one holding the bag. You alone are responsible for everything you do and every single thing you think.
Look, I didn't copy-paste a single damn thing, so quit coming at me with those false accusations. 👎

Look, I mean, it’s a quote from a book, right? So whether you actually sat there reading the pages and typing it out onto your laptop or just hit copy-paste doesn't really change the core of what happened. Honestly, getting all hung up on semantics like that isn't going to help anyone; if anything, it just feels like a way to dodge the actual point and refuse to face what's really going on here.
Honestly, asking who created God or who He’s supposed to answer to is just... I don't even know, man. It’s such a fundamentally stupid question that it almost makes my head spin. Like, if you're actually sitting there pondering the infinite loop of who birthed the Creator, you've already missed the entire point of the conversation. It's just circular nonsense, really. 👎

I’m totally with Edward Flores4 on this one—you’re just dodging the questions because you can't actually back up those wild theories of yours with anything real.

You know, I’ve developed this habit of just flat-out running the other way whenever I sense someone is trying to pull some mystical nonsense or wrap things up in layers of fake mystery. It’s honestly a survival tactic at this point, because let’s be real—the second you start buying into those manufactured enigmas, you’re handing over the keys to your own head. If you don't understand the mechanics behind what they're selling, they suddenly have all this leverage over you, and that's a dangerous spot to be in. We should all be standing on level ground, you know? Everyone deserves to have the same access to the truth without some gatekeeper playing mind games to keep us beneath them.
rowdyjackal5 rowdyjackal5 Member
14 messages
joined Mar 2009
#37 ·
Let me put it this way: you aren’t accountable to anyone else, but you’re certainly going to feel the fallout of your own negligence. I truly wish you nothing but luck in your future incarnations and hope you eventually reach a higher state of consciousness, but the lecturing ends here. Whether we believe in this stuff or not, my duty as a lightworker and a warrior is to enlighten you—but since you’re only answerable to yourself, I'm essentially hamstrung.
That isn't a direct quote; it’s just a paraphrase from my brilliant mind based on what I remember.

Fair point, Peter Phillips32. I haven't seen God or heard His voice personally, so if I say I feel Him in my heart, I suppose that's pure mystification. You're absolutely right. You and I are just frogs trying to grasp the concept of the ocean. How am I supposed to rationally explain eternity or the infinite to someone? Who has ever actually managed to do that with mere words?
Charles Diaz56 Charles Diaz56 Member
25 messages
joined Mar 2009
#38 ·
Brilliant minds and absolute geniuses...
and top-tier posts😁
Edward Flores4 Edward Flores4 Regular
428 messages
joined Mar 2008
#39 ·
Well, that’s that... Luke Skywalker is back in the fold once again 😁
placidharbor7 placidharbor7 Active Member
248 messages
joined Sep 2008
#40 ·
Edward Flores4 said:I’m pretty convinced that human stupidity is basically infinite—though, to be fair, I can't say for certain if it's always been this way since I wasn't around to witness the beginning of time.

In that same vein, more or less 🙄

So, it's "infinite," but you aren't quite sure if it's always existed, huh!?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads