CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Economy › Banking, Insurance & Loans › Getting a loan through an Austrian bank

Getting a loan through an Austrian bank

Started by Brenda Rogers41 · · 👁 17 views · 210 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Brenda Rogers41goldentinker79briskdriver110Terry HowardDaniel Perez13Maria James40cosmicsailor11Paul Williams9Terry Ross11Jack Wood4Andrew Booth29nimblebadger15Lisa Hill81Lisa Taylor2ruggedhawk182Jonathan Ward59Edward Sanchez74Joseph Murphy10Samuel Rivera12hollowheron32casualheron4Jesse Alvarez3Walter Martin56Joseph Howard3 …
Samuel Ramirez4 Samuel Ramirez4 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2011
#141 ·
swiftcyclist58 said:I pay my loan directly to the bank, and I just received my annual statement from them, so I don't see what the issue is. If I had to guess, I'd say the problem stems from pure ignorance... unfortunately...😕

Which bank did you take out the loan from?
Lawrence Cruz Lawrence Cruz Active Member
118 messages
joined Jun 2010
#142 ·
David Miller2 said:The truth is, plenty of "brokers" operate illegally, but you can always double-check. Most legitimate brokers have held some kind of IRS license for years, and starting this year, they also need specific licenses from the Department of the Treasury for credit brokering (which has been standard practice in Western Europe for ages). So, you can always ask a broker to prove they're licensed, approved for the work they're doing, what their fees are, and how they charge (obviously, only after the loan has actually cleared!). Brokers handling life insurance policies are also licensed and often authorized by most major domestic and international banks. Honestly, they're doing you a massive favor by setting up or assigning that insurance, because at the end of the day, it’s your money that you’re entitled to after paying into it over time (whether it's an annuity, dividends, or life/accident insurance to protect your family...). In other words, a real pro will always walk you through the procedure, the paperwork, the principal, the annuities, the interest rates, and everything else in plain English... but they also HAVE to be upfront about what THEY personally get paid, so everyone stays on good terms, haha.
Besides, for Americans who aren't great with finances, having this kind of help is better than blindly charging things to revolving credit cards, hitting negative balances, or falling for other banking traps. People tend to trust the banker implicitly because, hey, they aren't a "broker," they're a banker—even though they're basically dealers working for a salary plus commissions whenever they sign you up for risk coverage, savings plans, or checking accounts... people trust them just because they sit behind a desk in a big blue building, even when they might actually know less than a specialized broker. It would be great if we could discuss this based on actual facts rather than just rumors. Personally, a broker helped me settle three different loans, including one that wiped out all my "problems" with high-interest credit card debt right when I thought I was facing bankruptcy. Of course, for that level of professionalism and market knowledge, I had no problem paying for an insurance policy that gave me regular tax refunds of $667 annually. Now I know that if I ever lose my job, I can tap into that same policy (which I didn't even realize existed at the time) to survive until I find new income, just like an acquaintance of mine did.
Just trust the people who tell you exactly what you can and cannot do, what they can and cannot do, and exactly what the "price" is. And whatever you do, never give anyone money upfront! That's nonsense, and a real broker will NEVER ask you for that.

To be honest, I wasn't even aware that a banking or loan 🤷 broker actually needs a license. Sure, insurance, investments, brokers—that makes sense—but for loans 🤷? Not so much.
Could someone drop a link so I can look into this and get educated?

That whole thing about a banker getting a commission for setting up savings or checking accounts is just a red herring. For bank employees, that's simply part of their job description—it's what they do to earn their monthly paycheck, among other things.

As for that claim: I could take this exact policy (which I didn't even know existed, let alone what it was) and capitalize it—enough that a friend of mine coulduse that cash to survive until I find a new source of income. => clearly, you don't quite grasp the difference between capitalization and a policy surrender, or how these assets actually work in practice.
Richard Wright Richard Wright Active Member
102 messages
joined May 2010
#143 ·
I don't know what to tell you. Some people just don't get it. They look at the facts, stare them right in the face, and still decide to walk in the opposite direction. It’s frustrating, honestly. I’ve spent enough time watching these cycles repeat themselves to know when someone is being willfully ignorant. You can present the data, show them the logic, and lay out the consequences, but if they've already made up their minds? You're just shouting into a void. It's a waste of breath. kaže:
Let’s be real: plenty of these "middlemen" are operating outside the law, but that’s something you can actually verify if you bother to look. For years now, most legitimate brokers have held some form of SEC license. But starting January 1st, they also need to hold specific credit mediation licenses from the Department of the Treasury—which, frankly, has been standard practice across much of Western Europe for ages.
Look, if you’re dealing with Americans who have zero financial literacy, even this kind of assistance is a massive step up from watching them blindly charge everything to revolving credit cards, running their checking accounts into the red, and falling for every single banking scam out there.

It’s not that they’re breaking the law. It’s simpler than that: by their very definition, they aren't intermediaries, and they aren't legally permitted to act as a bridge between a client and a bank. Period.
Quality and the ability to distinguish between the winners and the losers should be left to the market's natural selection process—not dictated by some heavy-handed law.
The SEC has absolutely nothing to do with insurance brokers. An insurance agent or broker license isn't even in the same ballpark as consumer lending. And honestly? That’s a whole different mess—the fact that 70% of these people don't even hold the proper licensing required to be selling insurance in the first place.

I wouldn't go so far as to say Americans are financially illiterate. It’s more that we live in a country where the financial services market is still finding its footing—which means the general public's experience and actual expertise are both very much works in progress.
Besides that, let’s be honest: financial illiteracy isn't even the biggest hurdle we have to clear as a nation. We have much deeper, more systemic issues to tackle before we can even start worrying about that.
Lawrence Cruz said:To be honest, I wasn't even aware that a banking or loan 🤷 broker actually needs a license. Sure, insurance, investments, brokers—that makes sense—but for loans 🤷? Not so much.
Could someone drop a link so I can look into this and get educated?

That whole thing about a banker getting a commission for setting up savings or checking accounts is just a red herring. For bank employees, that's simply part of their job description—it's what they do to earn their monthly paycheck, among other things.

As for that claim: I could take this exact policy (which I didn't even know existed, let alone what it was) and capitalize it—enough that a friend of mine coulduse that cash to survive until I find a new source of income. => clearly, you don't quite grasp the difference between capitalization and a policy surrender, or how these assets actually work in practice.

The law officially went into effect on January 1, 2010, though everyone was given until January 1, 2011, to get their act together and comply.
If you want to understand how consumer lending actually works in this country, stop scrolling through social media nonsense and go straight to the source: the Department of the Treasury’s official breakdown on consumer credit. I spent my morning digging through their latest guidelines because, frankly, I'm tired of seeing people get fleeced by predatory lenders who hide their terms in fine print. It’s basic math, but apparently, it’s too much to ask for some folks to grasp. The Department lays out exactly what should be happening regarding interest rates, transparency, and the legal protections we have here in the States. Look, I’ve seen it happen a dozen times. A friend of mine—let’s call him Dave—gets lured in by a "low monthly payment" offer from some flashy fintech startup. He didn't read the APR. He didn't look at the total cost of credit. Before he knew it, he was drowning in fees that would make a Vegas casino blush. This isn't just bad luck; it's a lack of due diligence. The government's framework is designed to prevent exactly that kind of disaster. They mandate clear disclosures so you aren't blindsided by ballooning costs. If a lender isn't being upfront about the total amount you'll owe or the specific terms of the loan, they aren't just being shady—they're likely breaking federal law. Don't take my word for it. Read the documentation. Understand your rights. Knowledge is the only thing standing between you and a debt spiral that lasts longer than your career. Be smart, stay skeptical, and for heaven's sake, read the contract before you sign your life away.
The Department of the Treasury just dropped a new set of guidelines regarding who actually qualifies to facilitate lending. It’s one of those dense, bureaucratic deep dives that most people will skim past, but if you’re actually in the business of moving money, you need to pay attention. They aren't just throwing around rules for the sake of it; they’re tightening the leash on how credit intermediation is handled. I was reading through the specifics, and frankly, it feels like more red tape designed to squeeze the smaller players while the big banks just hire more lawyers to navigate the mess. It’s the same old story: more paperwork, more oversight, and more hurdles for anyone trying to do legitimate business without being a massive institutional powerhouse. If you think this is just about compliance, you're missing the point. This is about control. Every time the Treasury updates these protocols, the barrier to entry gets a little higher. It makes me wonder if they’re trying to streamline the market or if they’re just trying to make sure they know exactly whose pocket every dollar is landing in. It's frustrating, to say the least. If you're looking to get involved in lending or managing credit, don't just glance at the summary—read the fine print, or you'll find yourself staring down an audit you never saw coming.

--
🤔 What on earth does any of this have to do with the topic "Getting a loan through an Austrian bank"?
Lawrence Cruz Lawrence Cruz Active Member
118 messages
joined Jun 2010
#144 ·
Richard Wright said:
I don't know what to tell you. Some people just don't get it. They look at the facts, stare them right in the face, and still decide to walk in the opposite direction. It’s frustrating, honestly. I’ve spent enough time watching these cycles repeat themselves to know when someone is being willfully ignorant. You can present the data, show them the logic, and lay out the consequences, but if they've already made up their minds? You're just shouting into a void. It's a waste of breath. kaže:
Let’s be real: plenty of these "middlemen" are operating outside the law, but that’s something you can actually verify if you bother to look. For years now, most legitimate brokers have held some form of SEC license. But starting January 1st, they also need to hold specific credit mediation licenses from the Department of the Treasury—which, frankly, has been standard practice across much of Western Europe for ages.
Look, if you’re dealing with Americans who have zero financial literacy, even this kind of assistance is a massive step up from watching them blindly charge everything to revolving credit cards, running their checking accounts into the red, and falling for every single banking scam out there.

It’s not that they’re breaking the law. It’s simpler than that: by their very definition, they aren't intermediaries, and they aren't legally permitted to act as a bridge between a client and a bank. Period.
Quality and the ability to distinguish between the winners and the losers should be left to the market's natural selection process—not dictated by some heavy-handed law.
The SEC has absolutely nothing to do with insurance brokers. An insurance agent or broker license isn't even in the same ballpark as consumer lending. And honestly? That’s a whole different mess—the fact that 70% of these people don't even hold the proper licensing required to be selling insurance in the first place.

I wouldn't go so far as to say Americans are financially illiterate. It’s more that we live in a country where the financial services market is still finding its footing—which means the general public's experience and actual expertise are both very much works in progress.
Besides that, let’s be honest: financial illiteracy isn't even the biggest hurdle we have to clear as a nation. We have much deeper, more systemic issues to tackle before we can even start worrying about that.

The law officially went into effect on January 1, 2010, though everyone was given until January 1, 2011, to get their act together and comply.
If you want to understand how consumer lending actually works in this country, stop scrolling through social media nonsense and go straight to the source: the Department of the Treasury’s official breakdown on consumer credit. I spent my morning digging through their latest guidelines because, frankly, I'm tired of seeing people get fleeced by predatory lenders who hide their terms in fine print. It’s basic math, but apparently, it’s too much to ask for some folks to grasp. The Department lays out exactly what should be happening regarding interest rates, transparency, and the legal protections we have here in the States. Look, I’ve seen it happen a dozen times. A friend of mine—let’s call him Dave—gets lured in by a "low monthly payment" offer from some flashy fintech startup. He didn't read the APR. He didn't look at the total cost of credit. Before he knew it, he was drowning in fees that would make a Vegas casino blush. This isn't just bad luck; it's a lack of due diligence. The government's framework is designed to prevent exactly that kind of disaster. They mandate clear disclosures so you aren't blindsided by ballooning costs. If a lender isn't being upfront about the total amount you'll owe or the specific terms of the loan, they aren't just being shady—they're likely breaking federal law. Don't take my word for it. Read the documentation. Understand your rights. Knowledge is the only thing standing between you and a debt spiral that lasts longer than your career. Be smart, stay skeptical, and for heaven's sake, read the contract before you sign your life away.
The Department of the Treasury just dropped a new set of guidelines regarding who actually qualifies to facilitate lending. It’s one of those dense, bureaucratic deep dives that most people will skim past, but if you’re actually in the business of moving money, you need to pay attention. They aren't just throwing around rules for the sake of it; they’re tightening the leash on how credit intermediation is handled. I was reading through the specifics, and frankly, it feels like more red tape designed to squeeze the smaller players while the big banks just hire more lawyers to navigate the mess. It’s the same old story: more paperwork, more oversight, and more hurdles for anyone trying to do legitimate business without being a massive institutional powerhouse. If you think this is just about compliance, you're missing the point. This is about control. Every time the Treasury updates these protocols, the barrier to entry gets a little higher. It makes me wonder if they’re trying to streamline the market or if they’re just trying to make sure they know exactly whose pocket every dollar is landing in. It's frustrating, to say the least. If you're looking to get involved in lending or managing credit, don't just glance at the summary—read the fine print, or you'll find yourself staring down an audit you never saw coming.

--
🤔 What on earth does any of this have to do with the topic "Getting a loan through an Austrian bank"?

Thanks for the links. 🙂

I was wondering what the connection was—🤷 though I noticed it popping up in several different threads, so 😁 I figured I'd just ask.
steeltrucker10 steeltrucker10 Member
17 messages
joined Jan 2011
#145 ·
Hey everyone, did anyone catch the morning paper from Saturday? It reported another 58 people getting scammed. Seriously, folks, when does this madness actually end? I honestly don't know where we're headed. You can't even trust someone offering what looks like a perfectly legal loan anymore. These scammers walked away with $450,000 and now they’re just ghosting everyone, refusing to answer their phones. It’s heartbreaking to see people get taken advantage of like this. Life is hard enough as it is without people looking out to rob you.
neondriver5 neondriver5 Active Member
116 messages
joined May 2017
#146 ·
I was reading through this earlier, and honestly, I was just feeling bitter.
How can so many people be so incredibly, staggeringly naive and dim-witted?

"I'll get your loan sorted out in Switzerland, I just need 1% of the total upfront."
UPFRONT?!?!?!

Who pays in advance? Prostitutes? Who else? Nobody.
It actually made my blood boil while I was reading it.

I mean, where is everyone's common sense? Are you really going to give someone more than they're worth$33, for crying out loud? No paperwork, no nothing—you barely know them for two weeks and suddenly you're handing over 1% of a planned loan.
mellowrider10 mellowrider10 Member
15 messages
joined Sep 2010
#147 ·
Hey, can someone help me out? I haven't picked up a copy of the New York Times since Saturday, so if you could just drop the link or the headline for that article, I’d appreciate it. I've been digging around online but I'm having zero luck finding it. Thanks in advance!
steeltrucker10 steeltrucker10 Member
17 messages
joined Jan 2011
#148 ·
Just search for "exposed gang" on the pages of the Los Angeles Times and read up. Honestly, guys, has anyone else here ever even heard of the AXA Group?
Thomas Ortiz3 Thomas Ortiz3 Active Member
70 messages
joined May 2012
#149 ·
steeltrucker10 said:Just search for "exposed gang" on the pages of the Los Angeles Times and read up. Honestly, guys, has anyone else here ever even heard of the AXA Group?

The partner of Ines S. was a key player in the group because she played the part of a sympathetic listener perfectly during meetings with victims...

haha Quote 😁

Has anyone here actually heard of AXA Group?

Obviously:

http://www.axa.com/en/
Andrew Booth29 Andrew Booth29 Regular
338 messages
joined Mar 2012
#150 ·
mellowrider10 said:Hey, can someone help me out? I haven't picked up a copy of the New York Times since Saturday, so if you could just drop the link or the headline for that article, I’d appreciate it. I've been digging around online but I'm having zero luck finding it. Thanks in advance!

http://www.nytimes.com/article/Black...1/Default.aspx
steeltrucker10 steeltrucker10 Member
17 messages
joined Jan 2011
#151 ·
I know about the website, but I’m curious—has anyone actually secured a loan from them yet? Thanks, Thomas Ortiz3.
mellowrider10 mellowrider10 Member
15 messages
joined Sep 2010
#152 ·
Thanks a lot. I’ve been hunting for an overseas mortgage for a while now because getting one here in the States is impossible thanks to the Red Cross and all those endless blacklists. But honestly? I wouldn't give a single cent to anyone upfront. Crime in this country is blooming like nowhere else in the Western world. It feels like everyone just jumps at the chance to exploit an impoverished, struggling population. They should round up that whole gang, pay back the victims, and throw those thieves in jail—or better yet, sentence them to community service with nothing but one diet meal a day. People are so desperate, robbed blind, and left totally unprotected that they end up looking like fools by falling into even bigger... well, I won't go there. Most likely, they borrow money just to hand it over to scammers, while the people actually holding the cash just walk away clean. Man, if I had just five minutes of power, or whatever the phrase is...
Richard Wright Richard Wright Active Member
102 messages
joined May 2010
#153 ·
mellowrider10 said:Thanks a lot. I’ve been hunting for an overseas mortgage for a while now because getting one here in the States is impossible thanks to the Red Cross and all those endless blacklists. But honestly? I wouldn't give a single cent to anyone upfront. Crime in this country is blooming like nowhere else in the Western world. It feels like everyone just jumps at the chance to exploit an impoverished, struggling population. They should round up that whole gang, pay back the victims, and throw those thieves in jail—or better yet, sentence them to community service with nothing but one diet meal a day. People are so desperate, robbed blind, and left totally unprotected that they end up looking like fools by falling into even bigger... well, I won't go there. Most likely, they borrow money just to hand it over to scammers, while the people actually holding the cash just walk away clean. Man, if I had just five minutes of power, or whatever the phrase is...

Look, if you’re on a blacklist—or even if your credit report is just a mess—you aren't going to have any luck securing a loan overseas either.
If they decide to grant you credit, they’ll almost certainly demand your paperwork along with a credit report from the Red Cross...

Here are two more links regarding this topic:
Jerry Martinez5 Jerry Martinez5 Regular
278 messages
joined Apr 2009
#154 ·
mellowrider10 said:Thanks a lot. I’ve been hunting for an overseas mortgage for a while now because getting one here in the States is impossible thanks to the Red Cross and all those endless blacklists. But honestly? I wouldn't give a single cent to anyone upfront. Crime in this country is blooming like nowhere else in the Western world. It feels like everyone just jumps at the chance to exploit an impoverished, struggling population. They should round up that whole gang, pay back the victims, and throw those thieves in jail—or better yet, sentence them to community service with nothing but one diet meal a day. People are so desperate, robbed blind, and left totally unprotected that they end up looking like fools by falling into even bigger... well, I won't go there. Most likely, they borrow money just to hand it over to scammers, while the people actually holding the cash just walk away clean. Man, if I had just five minutes of power, or whatever the phrase is...

Look: if you're on a blacklist, what good is a loan? It won't help you; you'll just end up losing what little you have left. If you haven't been able to pay back your current loans or handle your overdrafts, I guess nothing is going to help you manage another loan (which you wouldn't be able to repay consistently anyway).

And if you end up falling for some predatory loan shark, I guess you can't really blame the government for that.
mellowrider10 mellowrider10 Member
15 messages
joined Sep 2010
#155 ·
Hey everyone, look, I hear you and I appreciate the advice. But my situation is a bit different. My husband and I both run our own small businesses, and we're currently blacklisted because of some overdraft issues on our checking accounts. We don't actually have any personal loans, but since we're paying off debts for others, we can't even get a clean report from the Red Cross. That’s why we were thinking about taking out a mortgage on our property—to clear everything out, finish the attic for our daughter, and finally get the workshop covered. That's the long and short of it. Honestly, thank God I had a moment of clarity and didn't fall for those predatory offers from the brokers. I've been in business for 20 years, and trust me, you have no idea what we've dealt with—from unpaid renovation costs to everything else. We're in manufacturing; this family business has been running for 50 years. Both my husband and I are highly educated in the same field, and our middle daughter is studying the exact same thing. Our oldest is finishing up her law degree, and our third is a junior in high school. If we have one flaw, it's that we're too honest, and that's exactly why we're stuck in this mess. I just want to live an honest, decent life off the work of my own hands.
steeltrucker10 steeltrucker10 Member
17 messages
joined Jan 2011
#156 ·
Is there seriously nobody here who tried going through Axe?
neondriver5 neondriver5 Active Member
116 messages
joined May 2017
#157 ·
FORGET ABOUT AXA, FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE!!! Forget those billboard ads, the upfront commissions, and those shady characters trying to pitch you loans in a local dive bar! And definitely forget about any "guaranteed" interest rates if you hand over your savings for a 20% monthly return! 🙂

ps
The caps lock isn't on by accident.
steeltrucker10 steeltrucker10 Member
17 messages
joined Jan 2011
#158 ·
Wait, what do you mean by those banners? No one even brought them up! I was actually wondering if anyone here knows anything about them. Maybe you know the deal, neondriver5? If you do, please let me know—or if anyone else has the scoop, I'm all ears.
Raymond Bishop41 Raymond Bishop41 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jan 2011
#159 ·
Manc, I’m basically in the same boat as your family—keep your head up, because things can only get better from here. But seriously, you need to think about those loans.🙏 They nearly pushed me out on the street. I have receipts showing I’ve paid 80% of what I owe, and for the rest, I have "confirmations" signed by a branch official whom they’re now claiming didn't even work there. Their lawyers even "admitted" in an informal chat that a bunch of payments weren't recorded, but they don't really care—it’s like, why should they pay us if we can't prove we sent the money? It's unbelievable. I contested most of their claims, but this specific part currently in litigation is way too much, because I’ve already paid it! The Supreme Court case has been dragging on for six years, and now I might actually have to take out a new loan just to cover legal fees, expert witnesses, and lawyers.👎 The court's vibe is basically: "Well, these are big-shot Austrian bankers and entrepreneurs, and we're just small business owners and thieves who want cash without paying our installments..."🤣😲😲 The middlemen made a killing, while we, the actual customers, end up paying for the same thing twice.
And don't even get me started on the state prosecutors. The court and some media outlets are acting like this poor bank was victimized by shady Americans who pulled huge sums of cash using "worthless" property as collateral, and apparently, everyone involved is already in jail in Austria. Now, this "bank" has been bought out by a new firm that’s aggressively pursuing foreclosures and lawsuits against everyone who took out a loan—both the honest people and the criminals. What’s worse is there are hundreds of cases like this, and most people have already lost in the US. The only way to actually win a fight against them is to take it to the courts in Austria.
mellowrider10 mellowrider10 Member
15 messages
joined Sep 2010
#160 ·
Dear Anavair, it’d be pretty ironic if I told you, "Hey, look, I'm not the only one going through hell right now." Honestly, I'm just glad you get it. We need this loan; it's not even about some massive pile of cash. My husband and I are in our fifties. People are probably thinking, "What were they doing all those years if they're stuck looking for outside financing in their fifties?" Well, yeah, we worked. We worked for renovations that never got paid for, lawsuits that just drag on forever, and since we're cooperative partners, our former employers either went belly up or ended up behind bars long ago. We paid our dues, only to find out we can't even get a loan from our own bank to upgrade our production and hire two or three people. Ten years ago, we had nine employees. Believe it or not, every morning they'd show up to coffee, and at noon, they'd have lunch I cooked myself while juggling three little kids. I handled all the paperwork solo. That's how I was raised—believe that you only get somewhere through honest work, and that I could show my kids by example that hard, HONEST work is the only way to make it. Now, when I can't even dream of hiring someone for half an hour because I can't pay them, the five of us—my husband, our three girls, and me—just jump on the machines. No shame in it, we do the heavy lifting ourselves as much as we can and handle the assembly. We aren't, and never were, some big-shot tycoons. For 50 years, this family I married into has lived off wood, dust, and sweat. And trust me, nothing beats the face of a happy customer, but nothing's harder than waiting on your money and having to fight and argue just to get what's yours.
I’m gonna be careful (not saying you weren't), but we really need this credit. I have to fix the workshop because the roof is leaking, and it's packed with machinery—I'm terrified the moisture is going to cause some serious electrical issues. My head is spinning with all this info about loans and I don't know what to do. I need this, and I need to act. Thanks for the support and for sharing your experience with me and everyone else here. You know, I remember my granddad used to say, "When things get bad, hang in there, because it's only going to get worse." Well... God help us, I hope he was wrong. It's gotta get better.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads