CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Spirituality › Liberation as the goal. But for what?

Liberation as the goal. But for what?

Started by mistybison · · 👁 8 views · 145 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Paul Campbell3steeleagle13placidharbor7silentnomad23Jason Johnson4mistybisonEdward Flores4coastalskipper92amberbadger8Richard Walker79Nicole Barrett76wiredcanyon6hollowtinker18driftingraven122ironharbor8jademarlin26casualmoose82casualmaker13casualtiger2brightnomad5wearyhawk83bluemason3wiredbear2Sophia Newman6 …
amberbadger8 amberbadger8 Member
39 messages
joined Sep 2008
#101 ·
coastalskipper92 said:I’m not particularly interested in discussing what happens after death, or things like past lives... that feels more like organized religion to me.

But regarding life itself... I’ve come to feel that true spirituality exists in total opposition to living. Because life is inherently, necessarily "messy."

And honestly? I don't even want that kind of spirituality. Is there anything less spiritual than craving absolute detachment, or longing for death while you're still alive?
If one were to live life in a constant trance, kept at arm's length, there would be no lessons left to learn. No real growth.

That doesn't mean those things shouldn't happen, of course; it just means I’ve chosen to stay present rather than retreat.

For instance, it’s quite frustrating when my current hormonal cycle feels much stronger than my spirit... when I'm feeling completely overwhelmed, when in reality, I just need a good night's sleep.🤣
A life without these shifts would be abnormal, frankly unthinkable.

There isn't a greater spiritual experience than, say, finding yourself doing things you never actually believed you were capable of doing.
And that is achieved through living, not by locking yourself away in a monastery or sitting in a lotus position for ten hours a day.

👍👍
Edward Flores4 Edward Flores4 Regular
428 messages
joined Mar 2008
#102 ·
placidharbor7 said:Above all else, it really comes down to the state of our own individual consciousness, doesn't it?

But honestly, I think the bigger issue isn't even the quality of that consciousness—it's the fact that most people don't even have a solid concept of "self" to begin with.

I try to explain it to them... spiritual growth is really just a mental descriptor. It's—well, if you were actually "fixed," you wouldn't be broken to start with, right? But hey... plenty of people claim they're working on themselves and insist they're making progress...

...and then you get those looks, like, "Who are you to judge?"—as if they're some kind of ultimate authority on their own enlightenment.
Richard Walker79 Richard Walker79 Active Member
112 messages
joined Sep 2008
#103 ·
Just like an apple tree doesn't drop fruit the moment it sprouts, spiritual growth takes time before those fruits finally appear. Take Milarepa, for instance. He started out filled with rage and even committed murder, yet he transformed into a Tibetan yogi who stands at the very pinnacle of spiritual mastery. It’s a powerful lesson for the average person who thinks they have it all figured out—you know, the "I know everything" crowd. It's just empty, dismissive philosophy. But honestly, if someone is truly happy, who am I to argue? Everyone knows what's best for themselves.
coastalskipper92 coastalskipper92 Active Member
85 messages
joined Nov 2008
#104 ·
Could someone please explain their vision of the "great nothingness" after death to me? And please, leave all the Buddhist teachings and whatnot out of it

As much as I find the idea of rolling meadows and fountains a bit surreal, it feels just as strange to think that someone could be absolutely certain there’s nothing waiting on the other side
For me, the only certainty is that the mind itself doesn't simply vanish... though who's to say if the entire psyche dies? If we consider the part of the mind serving consciousness—that pure, raw WILL—then to me, that seems entirely eternal

?
mistybison mistybison RegularOP
495 messages
joined Aug 2008
#105 ·
steeleagle13 said:I can't believe it... I know. 😁😲😁

Eventually, you will encounter "evidence" everywhere suggesting that the belief you currently hold as absolute truth is indeed reality. 🙂 This continues until the idea inevitably fades, making room for a new one, at which point the entire Universe seems to realign itself just to "confirm" your new perspective once again. It is a constant cycle. 😉

Edward Flores4 said:But honestly, I think the bigger issue isn't even the quality of that consciousness—it's the fact that most people don't even have a solid concept of "self" to begin with.

I try to explain it to them... spiritual growth is really just a mental descriptor. It's—well, if you were actually "fixed," you wouldn't be broken to start with, right? But hey... plenty of people claim they're working on themselves and insist they're making progress...

...and then you get those looks, like, "Who are you to judge?"—as if they're some kind of ultimate authority on their own enlightenment.

"Spiritual progress" doesn't necessarily mean repairing something broken; it can also mean upgrading, evolving, expanding, liberating, or any other transformation one might imagine. 🙂
steeleagle13 steeleagle13 Active Member
95 messages
joined Sep 2008
#106 ·
mistybison said:Eventually, you will encounter "evidence" everywhere suggesting that the belief you currently hold as absolute truth is indeed reality. 🙂 This continues until the idea inevitably fades, making room for a new one, at which point the entire Universe seems to realign itself just to "confirm" your new perspective once again. It is a constant cycle. 😉

"Spiritual progress" doesn't necessarily mean repairing something broken; it can also mean upgrading, evolving, expanding, liberating, or any other transformation one might imagine. 🙂

That’s exactly how your own argument works, isn't it?😉
Edward Flores4 Edward Flores4 Regular
428 messages
joined Mar 2008
#107 ·
mistybison said:Eventually, you will encounter "evidence" everywhere suggesting that the belief you currently hold as absolute truth is indeed reality. 🙂 This continues until the idea inevitably fades, making room for a new one, at which point the entire Universe seems to realign itself just to "confirm" your new perspective once again. It is a constant cycle. 😉

"Spiritual progress" doesn't necessarily mean repairing something broken; it can also mean upgrading, evolving, expanding, liberating, or any other transformation one might imagine. 🙂

The only thing you can really try to do is remain open to all this new information. As far as I can see, that’s the only way anyone could actually "work" on an "upgrade." But even then, it’s often not much of a game-changer.

A lot of people "know" deep down that everything is just an "illusion," but when they step out into a busy street in Chicago, they still make sure they don't get flattened by some "illusory" semi-truck. When you talk to people... nobody is being selfish or malicious, because everyone knows exactly what the "right" thing to say is when discussing spiritual topics... yet so few people actually integrate that info and live their lives in alignment with it.

Integrating new insights into your perceptual "model" is really the only "work" we can actually perform "on ourselves," and let's be honest—hardly anyone does it. People would much rather sit in a lotus position, go on a pilgrimage, or curl up with some spiritual bestseller... very few people actually want to sit there and interrogate their own actions, desires, opinions, and core beliefs. Most folks spend their energy protecting their existing convictions and behavioral patterns, and they tend to panic at the mere suggestion of change.
Nicole Barrett76 Nicole Barrett76 Regular
515 messages
joined Sep 2009
#108 ·
As a Harekrišnjevac, I hold the conviction that our material world is merely an inverted reflection of a tree standing by a river. If one were to observe a true tree from its summit downward, they would see the canopy and delicate twigs first, followed by the heavy branches, then the trunk, and finally the roots—yet in the water, the image appears in exact reverse. It is my belief that everything present in the spiritual realm finds a counterpart in this physical one, though here, everything feels fundamentally distorted. I believe that just as we experience movement and interaction between various beings in the physical world, so too does the spiritual realm possess its own activity; however, while our earthly interactions are often defined by ignorance and suffering, those in the spiritual realm are overflowing with eternal knowledge and bliss.

We are all eternal servants of God, and the ultimate purpose of our existence is to find our way back home to God, where we truly belong. Our goal is to once again enjoy eternal service to Him, just as we served Him before we fell into this material world.
Nicole Barrett76 Nicole Barrett76 Regular
515 messages
joined Sep 2009
#109 ·
coastalskipper92 said:Could someone please explain their vision of the "great nothingness" after death to me? And please, leave all the Buddhist teachings and whatnot out of it

As much as I find the idea of rolling meadows and fountains a bit surreal, it feels just as strange to think that someone could be absolutely certain there’s nothing waiting on the other side
For me, the only certainty is that the mind itself doesn't simply vanish... though who's to say if the entire psyche dies? If we consider the part of the mind serving consciousness—that pure, raw WILL—then to me, that seems entirely eternal

?

A person does not seek liberation just to dissolve into a vast void, but rather to live a life of service to God.
mistybison mistybison RegularOP
495 messages
joined Aug 2008
#110 ·
steeleagle13 said:That’s exactly how your own argument works, isn't it?😉

That applies to all claims and "knowledge" out there. 😉

Edward Flores4 said:The only thing you can really try to do is remain open to all this new information. As far as I can see, that’s the only way anyone could actually "work" on an "upgrade." But even then, it’s often not much of a game-changer.

A lot of people "know" deep down that everything is just an "illusion," but when they step out into a busy street in Chicago, they still make sure they don't get flattened by some "illusory" semi-truck. When you talk to people... nobody is being selfish or malicious, because everyone knows exactly what the "right" thing to say is when discussing spiritual topics... yet so few people actually integrate that info and live their lives in alignment with it.

Integrating new insights into your perceptual "model" is really the only "work" we can actually perform "on ourselves," and let's be honest—hardly anyone does it. People would much rather sit in a lotus position, go on a pilgrimage, or curl up with some spiritual bestseller... very few people actually want to sit there and interrogate their own actions, desires, opinions, and core beliefs. Most folks spend their energy protecting their existing convictions and behavioral patterns, and they tend to panic at the mere suggestion of change.

Are you describing a focus on psychology rather than spirituality? I wonder if you truly believe this path can lead us toward the liberation we discuss here.
wiredcanyon6 wiredcanyon6 Member
12 messages
joined Oct 2008
#111 ·
@Maleficent,shamantrixx
Spiritual growth is all about evolving, expanding, and letting go. But you can't really get there without questioning your own actions, desires, and beliefs. Integration requires actual change, otherwise it’s just a theory. That’s why this whole process usually involves things like retreats, meditation, or diving into some deep spiritual books.
Edward Flores4 Edward Flores4 Regular
428 messages
joined Mar 2008
#112 ·
mistybison said:That applies to all claims and "knowledge" out there. 😉

Are you describing a focus on psychology rather than spirituality? I wonder if you truly believe this path can lead us toward the liberation we discuss here.

You can label it however you like, but when it comes down to actual "spiritual work," dealing with your own psyche is really the first—and honestly, the only—thing you can do to "develop" the spirit.

And sure, that path can absolutely lead to "liberation"... I’d go so far as to say there isn't really any other way around it. You see spiritualists constantly bashing the mind, often using their own lack of understanding as an excuse by claiming spirituality is somehow "beyond rationalization"... but unfortunately, that couldn't be further from the truth.

People tend to memorize metaphors and pieces of wisdom, yet they can't say anything meaningful about them other than repeating them verbatim while rambling about how the mind is simply incapable of grasping the spiritual. As long as that's the case, it's pretty obvious the person hasn't actually integrated those "sacred" insights into their perception—because once you truly grasp a concept, you can talk about it until you're blue in the face.

The only things that feel "incomprehensible" are the things we don't have the slightest clue about, but that doesn't stop certain spiritual "experts" from practically bragging about their confusion. They act as if being spiritual means you shouldn't think at all, just accepting everything blindly... without any thought, integration, or genuine understanding.

Besides... the "path of unification" is known (as I'm sure you know) as Yoga. And as far as I'm aware, one of the specific paths within yoga is Self-actualization, or "The yoga of knowledge."

It used to be called the "royal yoga," mostly because only a king could afford to spend all day in contemplation without having to actually *do* anything. It was a similar story with philosophy back in the day—hardly anyone could afford to sit around philosophizing before the Industrial Revolution hit.

And you've probably heard of a guy named Nagarjun... he wasn't exactly a fan of meditation as a substitute for "self-work." He believed all spiritual concepts are quite easy to grasp once you stop making excuses and decide to actually turn your brain on. They say he could "enlighten" someone in a single conversation—provided, of course, the person actually wanted to figure out what their problem was in the first place.

Most people actually cling to their problems... it makes them feel special, unique... it gives them an identity that others recognize and judge by. It's like saying, "You know... his dad was an alcoholic and used to beat him when he was a kid... he turned out to be a pretty good guy despite all that"... stuff like that.🙄
hollowtinker18 hollowtinker18 Active Member
120 messages
joined Sep 2011
#113 ·
Enči, I noticed you’re making some serious headway with your posts lately. That book on Tibetan philosophy actually gave me something to chew on, though personally, I doubt anyone ever truly finds total liberation. Why bother?
driftingraven122 driftingraven122 Active Member
89 messages
joined Nov 2008
#114 ·
driftingraven122 says:
I suppose I should say something—though I’m not entirely sure what there is to say—about shamantrixx. driftingraven122 says:
You probably heard about that guy Nagarjuna—he wasn't exactly a fan of meditation being framed as "self-improvement," I guess.
Nagarjuna driftingraven122 said:LIII. One should probably strive to remain disciplined in the pursuit of the highest morality—and wisdom, I suppose.
And, I suppose, the absolute peak. Absorption—or the lack thereof—is a rather tricky subject, I suppose. One might assume it's straightforward, but there’s always a catch, isn't there?

Nagarjuna driftingraven122 said:LIV. Good grief— Body awareness—or mindfulness, if you prefer the trendy term—is an interesting concept, I guess. It’s essentially just paying attention to physical sensations without immediately judging them—though that part is easier said than done. I was essentially trained to be the—well, I suppose you could call it the standard.
The only path to liberation—according to the Sugata, I suppose—is through his teachings.

I suspect this doesn't even have anything to do with psychology—I mean, maybe I'm wrong—but by using absorption, you essentially strip away fabrications like "the psyche" and can finally observe how things actually manifest.

Just my two cents. ☕
Edward Flores4 Edward Flores4 Regular
428 messages
joined Mar 2008
#115 ·
I’m honestly just really glad you’ve got him in your corner 🙂
steeleagle13 steeleagle13 Active Member
95 messages
joined Sep 2008
#116 ·
CHAPTER XI The MYSTERIOUS Stranger Mark Twain



For as much as a year Satan continued Thes visits, but eventually he started showing up less, and then—for a long stretch—he didn't show up at all. It left me feeling isolated and pretty depressed. I figured he was getting bored with our tiny little corner of the universe and might just ditch me for good. So when he actually showed up one day, I was thrilled—well, for about five seconds. Turns out he was just stopping by to say goodbye. One last time. He claimed he had business and projects in other parts of the cosmos that were going to keep him occupied way longer than I’d be able to wait around for him.

"So you're just leaving? Not coming back?"

"Yeah," he said. "We've been buddies for a long time, and it's been good—good for both of us. But I've gotta move on, and WE shall meet in another , surely."

"In this life, Satan? Or in another? WE shall meet in another , surely?"

Then, totally calm and dead serious, he drops this bombshell: "There isn't another."

Some weird vibe drifted from him to me, leaving me with this hazy, faint, but strangely hopeful feeling that maybe—just maybe—this crazy idea was actually true.

"You really never suspected this, Theodore?"

"No. How could I? But if it's actually true—"

"It is true."

I felt this surge of gratitude, but then doubt hit me and I choked it back. I managed, "But—but—we've seen that afterlife—actually seen it—so—"

"That was just a vision. It wasn't real."

My chest felt tight with this massive sense of hope. "A vision? A vi—"

"Life itself is nothing but a vision. A dream."

It hit me like an electric shock. My God! I'd thought the exact same thing a thousand times while I was brooding!

"Nothing is real; everything is a dream. God—people—the world—the sun, the moon, the whole damn galaxy—it's all a dream. None of it exists. There's nothing but empty space—and you!"

"Me!"

"And you aren't even really 'you.' You don't have a body, or blood, or bones. You're just a thought. I don't even exist; I'm just a dream—a figment of your imagination. Once you realize this, you'll stop dreaming me up, and I'll just vanish back into the nothingness I came from...

"I'm fading out already—I'm dying off. Soon, you'll be all alone in endless space, wandering through total solitude forever without a single friend or partner—because you'll still be a thought, the only thing that actually exists, and since you're a thought, you can't be destroyed. But me? Your lowly servant? I've shown you who you are and set you free. Go ahead, dream other dreams. Better ones!"

"It's wild! That you didn't suspect this ages ago—centuries, eons ago!—when you've been drifting through eternity all by yourself."

Honestly, it's bizarre that you wouldn't realize your entire universe and everything in it was just a dream or some work of fiction. It's weird because it's so blatantly, hysterically insane—just like all dreams are. Think about it: a God who can make good kids as easily as bad ones, but chooses to make the bad ones; someone who could have made everyone happy, but didn't bother making a single soul happy; someone who makes people value their miserable lives, then cuts them short without a second thought; someone who gives His angels unearned bliss but demands everyone else work for it; someone who gives His angels easy lives while cursing everyone else with mental and physical agony; someone who talks big about justice and invents hell—talks about mercy and invents hell—preaches the Golden Rule and forgiveness seventy times seven, and *still* invents hell; someone who lectures everyone else on morality but doesn't follow it himself; someone who condemns crime but does every single crime; someone who creates humans without asking, then tries to blame humans for what they do instead of taking the responsibility Himself; and then, with total divine stupidity, expects this poor, mistreated slave to sit there and worship Him! . . .

"You're starting to see it now—that none of this is actually possible unless you're trapped in a dream. You realize these are just pure, childish delusions, the nonsense of an imagination that isn't even aware of its own glitches. Basically, it's a dream, and you're the one dreaming it up. All the signs were right there; you really should've caught on sooner.

"Everything I've shown you is the truth: there is no God, no universe, no human race, no life on Earth, no heaven, and no hell. It's all just a dream—a twisted, ridiculous dream. Nothing exists besides you. And even you? You're nothing more than a thought—a drifting, pointless, lost thought, wandering aimlessly through endless emptiness!"

Then he was gone, leaving me completely shaken; because deep down, I knew—I fucking knew—that everything he said was real.

😁😁😁
ironharbor8 ironharbor8 Member
41 messages
joined Dec 2008
#117 ·
Enchantress, excellent topic. :-)

If memory serves, Buddha once noted that life is suffering. To eliminate suffering—to achieve liberation—would logically imply eliminating life itself.

I see a few ways this could play out. One method, as someone else pointed out earlier, involves the only philosophical question left worth asking: to be or not to be? However, that isn't a particularly practical solution; if reincarnation is a thing, you simply find yourself back in some other space at some point, starting the cycle all over again. That leaves only one option: discarding life by refusing to let it touch you. Not participating. Becoming a mere observer who remains untouched. A state of total indifference. A silent witness, an invisible presence.

You participate in life only as much as necessary, but you stop expecting, longing, grieving, or celebrating based on external circumstances. You simply exist, having realized the transience and futility of all existence.

From my current perspective, everything is meaningless, fleeting, chaotic, and ultimately absurd. There is no karma, no soul evolution, no spiritual growth—just more childish theories that no longer hold water. They aren't even logically consistent. Consequently, I have temporarily concluded that it is all nonsense. Life is merely a passing whim, like a soap bubble catching the sunlight, creating a deceptive illusion of importance, being, and beauty when, in reality, there is nothing there.

My only regret is this nagging feeling that taking one's own life is somehow wrong; instead, one must wait for the candle to burn down naturally. It is this singular sensation that keeps me here; otherwise, I would have long since departed from this whimsical planet of absurdity.

It seems to me that the greatest obstacle to achieving this state of the untouchable observer is the very instinct for life—the urge to experience and participate. In truth, true existence stands in direct opposition to the desire to live and feel.

Likely, behind all of this sits someone heartless with a terrible sense of humor, laughing at our failed attempts to grasp meaning through intellect.

"Weary of it all, I cry out for the death of stillness."
jademarlin26 jademarlin26 Active Member
158 messages
joined Sep 2008
#118 ·
ironharbor8 said:Enchantress, excellent topic. :-)

If memory serves, Buddha once noted that life is suffering. To eliminate suffering—to achieve liberation—would logically imply eliminating life itself.

I see a few ways this could play out. One method, as someone else pointed out earlier, involves the only philosophical question left worth asking: to be or not to be? However, that isn't a particularly practical solution; if reincarnation is a thing, you simply find yourself back in some other space at some point, starting the cycle all over again. That leaves only one option: discarding life by refusing to let it touch you. Not participating. Becoming a mere observer who remains untouched. A state of total indifference. A silent witness, an invisible presence.

You participate in life only as much as necessary, but you stop expecting, longing, grieving, or celebrating based on external circumstances. You simply exist, having realized the transience and futility of all existence.

From my current perspective, everything is meaningless, fleeting, chaotic, and ultimately absurd. There is no karma, no soul evolution, no spiritual growth—just more childish theories that no longer hold water. They aren't even logically consistent. Consequently, I have temporarily concluded that it is all nonsense. Life is merely a passing whim, like a soap bubble catching the sunlight, creating a deceptive illusion of importance, being, and beauty when, in reality, there is nothing there.

My only regret is this nagging feeling that taking one's own life is somehow wrong; instead, one must wait for the candle to burn down naturally. It is this singular sensation that keeps me here; otherwise, I would have long since departed from this whimsical planet of absurdity.

It seems to me that the greatest obstacle to achieving this state of the untouchable observer is the very instinct for life—the urge to experience and participate. In truth, true existence stands in direct opposition to the desire to live and feel.

Likely, behind all of this sits someone heartless with a terrible sense of humor, laughing at our failed attempts to grasp meaning through intellect.

"Weary of it all, I cry out for the death of stillness."

What was the point of all those eons of evolution if we are just meant to be stones? One can breathe deeply and still remain unattached, refusing to be swept up by existence. Perhaps the secret to non-attachment lies precisely in the absurdity of it all—living simply for the sake of living, rather than chasing some grand purpose.

As for sadness, it is an inevitability in this temporal realm we inhabit. It is perfectly natural to feel sorrow when loss is baked into our daily reality, where one life is built upon the passing of another. Rather than fleeing from it, one should simply come to terms with it.
placidharbor7 placidharbor7 Active Member
248 messages
joined Sep 2008
#119 ·
Mark Twain says:


CHAPTER XI
THE MYSTERIOUS STRANGER

"It is true, that which I have revealed to you; there is no God, no universe, no human race, no earthly life, no heaven, no hell. It is all a dream - a grotesque and foolish dream. Nothing exists but you. And you are but a thought - a vagrant thought, a useless thought, a homeless thought, wandering forlorn among the empty eternities!"

He vanished, and left me appalled; for I knew, and realized, that all he had said was true.😁😁😁

Mr. Twain lingers a bit too long on that whole "dream" concept—honestly, it might have been better if he hadn't stumbled upon it at all!
As long as there is even one single "station" or "anchor" to hold onto, I say we just hang this kind of nihilism out to dry, my fellow Truth Seekers!
coastalskipper92 coastalskipper92 Active Member
85 messages
joined Nov 2008
#120 ·
Edward Flores4 said:You can label it however you like, but when it comes down to actual "spiritual work," dealing with your own psyche is really the first—and honestly, the only—thing you can do to "develop" the spirit.

And sure, that path can absolutely lead to "liberation"... I’d go so far as to say there isn't really any other way around it. You see spiritualists constantly bashing the mind, often using their own lack of understanding as an excuse by claiming spirituality is somehow "beyond rationalization"... but unfortunately, that couldn't be further from the truth.

People tend to memorize metaphors and pieces of wisdom, yet they can't say anything meaningful about them other than repeating them verbatim while rambling about how the mind is simply incapable of grasping the spiritual. As long as that's the case, it's pretty obvious the person hasn't actually integrated those "sacred" insights into their perception—because once you truly grasp a concept, you can talk about it until you're blue in the face.

The only things that feel "incomprehensible" are the things we don't have the slightest clue about, but that doesn't stop certain spiritual "experts" from practically bragging about their confusion. They act as if being spiritual means you shouldn't think at all, just accepting everything blindly... without any thought, integration, or genuine understanding.

Besides... the "path of unification" is known (as I'm sure you know) as Yoga. And as far as I'm aware, one of the specific paths within yoga is Self-actualization, or "The yoga of knowledge."

It used to be called the "royal yoga," mostly because only a king could afford to spend all day in contemplation without having to actually *do* anything. It was a similar story with philosophy back in the day—hardly anyone could afford to sit around philosophizing before the Industrial Revolution hit.

And you've probably heard of a guy named Nagarjun... he wasn't exactly a fan of meditation as a substitute for "self-work." He believed all spiritual concepts are quite easy to grasp once you stop making excuses and decide to actually turn your brain on. They say he could "enlighten" someone in a single conversation—provided, of course, the person actually wanted to figure out what their problem was in the first place.

Most people actually cling to their problems... it makes them feel special, unique... it gives them an identity that others recognize and judge by. It's like saying, "You know... his dad was an alcoholic and used to beat him when he was a kid... he turned out to be a pretty good guy despite all that"... stuff like that.🙄

👍

An obsession with the ego... even when we claim to despise it. It’s a curious thing, isn't it? As long as we aren't truly indifferent, we're still tethered to it. No matter how much vitriol we throw its way, if there's still passion left—even if that passion is pure resentment—we haven't actually moved past it. Are we really free if we're still fighting the shadow?

I feel like I should probably mention this once more, though I suppose it's redundant... this whole idea that one can somehow weaken the ego before being permanently struck by the force of enlightenment? It’s nothing more than a fairy tale. A bit of a fantasy, really. Is it even possible? Probably not.
The ego... it’s in a constant state of expiration, isn't it? Always dying. It feels like a repetitive cycle, almost exhausting if one thinks about it too long. Does it ever truly stay gone, or is it just waiting for the next moment to resurface? Constant dissolution. Quite curious, really.
And so, the NEW one arrives... regardless of how enlightened you might believe yourself to be.

Is it just rusting away, or is it actually evolving? It’s hard to say, really. But there it sits, laid out with all its vital organs intact.
Temperament remains unchanged. Is it not simply a fixed constant? One wonders if we ever truly move beyond our innate nature, or if we merely learn to mask it behind various social pretenses. It seems, quite frankly, that who we are at our core stays exactly the same.
I recall a time when I was lost in my own little cinematic universe—completely self-absorbed and perpetually gripped by anxiety. I was that person, you know? The one who simply refused to listen to anyone else's input. It was quite a state of being. Interestingly enough, when I finally sat down for a temperament assessment, my "phlegmatic" score came in at a mere 8%. Just a tiny fraction.

Today I find myself playing the role of the "second person," yet the congestion remains absolutely relentless...
Even when my entire worldview shifts... even when behavior patterns start to drift... I remain what I was designed to be. Born. Created. Always, fundamentally, already defined.

For instance, I find myself rarely moved to excitement lately. Others... they don't quite grasp what's happening beneath the surface, my sense of enlightened peace. They see only the stillness. Why should they? 🥳 ...because, honestly, when it comes to the subjects I actually care about, I’m still going to speak my mind—loudly and without any apologies.

As long as I keep moving and evolving, my temperament stays exactly the same. Does anything ever truly change? Or do we just rearrange the furniture while the core remains untouched?
I suppose I am not quite free from the ego just yet. Is that not always the case? One tries to step aside, to let go, only to find the self still lingering in the corner of the room, watching. It’s a persistent thing, isn't it?

Of course, one could simply blend into the crowd of some xy people and spend the rest of their days sitting in a Lotus... but then again? 😂

So... regarding this "problem" I wanted to bring up for discussion...
Is there truly such a thing as final enlightenment? Or some permanent escape from our problems... forever?
So, you can certainly choose to lock yourself away in some sanctuary or temple if that’s your preference... but let’s be honest: that isn't a permanent fix, is it?

When you live among people, you’re constantly bumping into one problem after another. It’s just the nature of things. Anyone claiming they’ve ascended to some level where they sit entirely above life's troubles? They’re lying. Or worse—if that were actually possible, wouldn't it be incredibly bleak? To limit oneself like that... there would be nothing left to learn.
If you find yourself dragging some sort of heavy baggage along everywhere you go... if that weight is constantly riding shotgun... then what you’re calling "problems" aren't actually problems at all. They're just your reality. Is that even a problem? Or is it just life?

Everything was perfectly normal then. Or so it seemed.

So, here is an example:

They’ve been accusing me of being egocentric lately. And then there's this whole business regarding my... let's call it a "closed-off" perspective. A sense of exclusivity, they say. Is that what it is? Or am I just seeing things through a different lens than everyone else? Perhaps. It's all quite curious, really.

Through all of that, there was this one constant, unchanging part of me—this deep-seated hyper-emotionality. It just sat there, right at the core.

I change everything negative... yet she remains exactly as she was. It’s as if her only mission is to refine her flaws—which, in this case, means cultivating an endless capacity for understanding everyone, regardless of how much it costs me.

How does one actually outgrow their own ego? Is there even a roadmap for that, or are we all just wandering blindly through our own delusions? I find myself wondering if it’s possible to truly move past the self, to reach a point where the "I" stops being the center of the universe. Is it an achievement, or more like a quiet surrender?

I am, you jerk.

Well, now I have another one...

It’s this persistent, nagging contrast that keeps weighing on me. I find myself grasping the nuances of people—truly seeing them—yet somehow, they fail to see me. Why is it that the connection always seems to be one-sided? 😂
Not quite so much when it's just the two of us. Because that would imply I’m actually... well, engaging in such activities, and that I am still, somehow, preoccupied with my own self. 😉
Honestly, when I find myself speaking in front of an informal group... well, I know I can't exactly be my full self. I have to leave certain parts of me behind—keep them tucked away—otherwise, their brains might just short-circuit from the weight of my topics. Is that even possible? To truly be known? I suppose I’m far from perfect myself, much like the people I’m talking to.

Now, when I listen... I am listening one hundred percent. Truly. It’s because I’ve learned to follow my intuition—to trust that inner compass—simply because I finally understood what I needed to learn about myself.
I’m starting to see the core essence in everyone...
Of course, I can’t interpret them as distinct individuals—it's not like I have psychic powers—but I perceive this underlying essence that defies description.
And then people start giving me grief because they notice how ten different people around me all perceive my own essence in ten completely different ways.
It’s all quite disorienting... perhaps if I actually paid attention to the thread title, I’d realize there is no such thing as liberation. 😉

It’s like that old saying, "accept what you cannot change."

That really is the hardest lesson to learn...
Once you finish balancing the books with your ego, you're left with the task of meeting your true essence and finally accepting it.

There isn't a single soul out there who doesn't feel at least a flicker of shame regarding their true self; that's where the lack of freedom begins.
You don't necessarily need to develop a complex about your ego, but in the end, that raw essence is what remains.
It's that feeling—that sudden hair-raising sensation when someone crosses a line into your private intimacy. No one can put a clinical label on it like a psychological complex, yet it's undeniably there.

The true self is immutable... and one must learn how to live with it.
That is what enlightenment actually is, rather than all those spiritual textbooks or "gadgets designed to assist astral projection." 😂😂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads