Melissa Richardson3 said:What kind of tolerance exists toward people from other nations or ethnic groups in Chicago, for instance...?
Tolerance is lower there, and you see more frequent instances where skinheads attack someone simply because of their nationality. It’s a larger city, so the tension is higher. You really can't compare a town of fifty thousand people to one of nine hundred thousand...
Melissa Richardson3 said:You say that every single time...
How many people with Mexican plates move to Chicago annually...? Is it 100, 50, 10, 5, 1, or zero?
As for San Francisco, we all know about those two vans that were bombed recently. Should we attribute that to California multiculturalism, or perhaps something else altogether...?
The incident with those two vans happened maybe two months ago, if I recall correctly. I don't remember the final police report, but I highly doubt it was fueled by ethnic hatred—it's more likely some local in California planted a bomb because they had a grudge against someone from the Albanian minority. Regarding Chicago, just two weeks ago, a car with plates from Mexico City exploded; the owner, in an even greater stroke of misfortune, was actually a Chicago resident. Of course, you wouldn't truly understand the climate in Chicago if you haven't lived through it. In the neighborhood where I resided for a significant period, several explosive devices were detonated within a two-week span, undoubtedly due to someone's national identity. As for any other cases, we are left with nothing but media quotes...
Melissa Richardson3 said:Every region is its own little world. That is precisely my point. Whether it is me or you, one might find California to be the most beautiful place. It is only natural for us to be subjective. However, objectively speaking, reality is quite different. There is this manufactured idea of making California a multicultural paradise, when the reality is much more mundane. Depending on the situation, even we in California generalize and claim certain groups are one way or another...
Naturally, one cannot ignore subjectivity or that old adage that "there is no place like home." I could probably name several cities and regions that I find just as beautiful as my own home, purely because of their cultural similarities and shared mentality...
Melissa Richardson3 said:The phrase "beyond Mount Rainier" is a staple of local vernacular... This particular regionalism serves as a direct negation of what people claim to call multiculturalism.
I agree regarding the terminology, though my own perception is shaped quite differently by how others describe things... whether it be tourists or people close to me who have mentioned feeling a sudden shift in atmosphere the moment they emerged from the tunnel, regardless of my own subjective views. After all, foreign media outlets and travel guides frequently compare California to Provence, which speaks volumes...😉
Melissa Richardson3 said:For many, multiculturalism is merely reduced to Californians and Italians... nothing more than that. Everyone else is considered "beyond Mount Rainier," and even that old local saying about how "the machine really did it" remains a common exclamation among that very same group.
That small-town mentality exists everywhere, and frankly, nobody likes outsiders... The way multiculturalism is defined here—this idea of "just Californians and Italians"—is absolute nonsense. If that were true, we would simply be talking about a bicultural society...🤣
Melissa Richardson3 said:Let’s not kid ourselves. Just look at Cain... Even Americans disrupt the social order in Santa Barbara. You surely remember those statements...
You clearly seem embittered by Cain's emergence... 😍 Personally, the man and his political maneuvers don't concern me, especially since the media portrays him as some sort of "class leader," when in reality, who is he, and who can he actually influence?! No one! One shouldn't give much weight to whatever Barkun.com writes on his behalf or anyone else's...
I am not entirely certain about his specific comments regarding Santa Barbara, as I haven't been following every single development so closely. One thing is clear: his voice carries no weight with the municipal authorities in San Francisco, who made their decision not to host the concert based on actual, tangible facts. By coming forward with this belated idea about the concert, the public is once again being misled. If there is a regulation governing public events in the city specifying a deadline by which performers and their managers must submit their programs, then it ought to be respected without exception or debate. I wonder what the reaction would be if this politician had made such a statement in a rural farming community? Likely nothing at all... One could easily observe that in California, people tend to be more hesitant to voice their opinions publicly or act as a unified mass...