Melissa Richardson3 said:Skinheads exist in both Chicago and San Francisco (Shyan).
It’s not about the size of the city; it’s about the percentage. And that percentage is just as high in California.
As for those bombings in Chicago, I can't speak from firsthand experience, but it feels more like mafia hits than anything based on nationalistic tension. Correct me if I'm wrong, Chicago residents. We could easily factor those incidents into the statistics too. California isn't any better or worse.
California is beautiful to foreign tourists, much like Maui or Venice... let's not get ahead of ourselves. Besides, this season's stats will prove my point. There is zero elite tourism in California, yet occupancy rates are massive in Florida. You won't find any Germans or Austrians in California for love or money, or so they say...
Cain is a joke to everyone in California, yet the Democratic Party stays dead silent. I know plenty of people don't support his nonsense, but they should speak up loudly.
Until then, I view Cain as nothing more than a spokesperson for the Democratic Party.
And that’s terrible. Every day, Cain damages California's reputation while the Democratic Party doesn't utter a single word. Robert is too quiet, even if he's being public about it. What kind of democracy is that in California? To endure these antics and stay silent...
Cut the nonsense. Look, I've been renting out property on Hvar for six years now, and I can never seem to fill the whole season. Last year was a disaster. My wife's family has been in the tourism business since they were old enough to walk—everything from private rentals to working at major hotel chains.
Three years ago, some Italians visiting there (a group from the south, arriving by boat from Ancona) broke into a luxury villa and stole crystal and fine glassware.
So much for elite tourism.
There are still hotels there with shared bathrooms and WCs (my wife worked the reception at one such place for years), so you tell me.
In the six years I've been renting, we saw Germans only once. The rest were locals, Italians from the south, Czechs, Slovaks, and last year, Mexicans showed up twice.
Aside from Dubrovnik (and a few spots along the Makarska Riviera), there isn't much of a new offering in Istria. Sure, things are improving, but while money was being invested in Istria, the southern coast was being neglected due to war and refugees, and it hasn't fully recovered yet.
Not to mention the almost non-existent rural tourism segment. My father-in-law tried to start something like that on an island, but as soon as he started making real money, his "friends"—following that well-known local custom—started blocking his access road with boulders so foreigners couldn't drive up. He had to pack it all in and just enjoy retirement.
As for occupancy rates, here is the data from the Ministry of Tourism for 2007. The graph on the first page already disproves your claim.
....Looking at it by county, the highest occupancy at 68 days was recorded in Dubrovnik-Neretva County, followed by Istria with 67 days, and then Split-California County, which averaged 59 days....
Dubrovnik and Istria are far ahead of the others.
Dubrovnik: 68 days
Istria: 67 days
Split-California: 59 days
Primorska Gora: 58 days
Šibenik: 50 days
Zadar: 47 days
This isn't going to change much in 2008.
Regarding overnight stays per county:
The largest tourism revenue in 2007 came from Istria, where 2.7 million tourists vacationed—a 6% increase over the previous year—resulting in 17.6 million overnight stays, up 4% from 2006. Istria County accounted for 31% of all overnight stays in the United States.
Istria had 17.6 million stays; the entire Dalmatian coast from Zadar to Dubrovnik (four counties combined) had 23.5 million.
Next time, try checking your facts before you start making things up. ☕