#21 ·
ruggedraven42 said:I don't know, I suspect statistics remains the backbone of just about every niche in psychology, so I really doubt that. I mean, even if you look at the correction, interpretation, and integration of results from any given assessment tool or observation—that all demands a solid grasp of statistical concepts. You need those theoretical foundations to actually make sense of the data coming out of psychological measurements.
...and even if we ignore that entirely, there's always the matter of maintaining a license. That’s unavoidable. It requires attending seminars, hitting up conferences, maybe even conducting research or publishing papers. So, yeah—statistical significance is always going to be lurking in the background somewhere. 😍
I could be wrong, but it feels like you're still in college and haven't actually started working in the field yet...