Ronald Anderson48 said:St. Jerome is actually a different parish, so getting married there isn't an option. At least, that's what I was told this year.
Otherwise, the chapel is just what's left of the "St. Stephen under the Pines" monastery. Regarding those comments about weddings being held at a cemetery—I wouldn't allow a ceremony there myself just for the sake of following some trend.
It's a former cemetery. And no, it wasn't about "trends," it was about "appearances."🥳 Does that make me any less of a faithful Catholic when it comes to getting married there?
It’s actually the same parish as St. Francis and Manhattan, so they do weddings there, and I think I saw one happening just today.
So, looking at this whole mess regarding whether or not people are actually allowed to get married over in Manhattan... honestly, I feel like regardless of what kind of specific circumstances a couple might be dealing with, the church shouldn't really belong to the priest alone. It feels a bit off that he gets to just decide on his own whim who’s allowed to tie the knot there and who isn't, or basically acting like the judge of whose reasoning is "good enough" and whose just isn't. I guess it's just my take, but it seems like he shouldn't have that much arbitrary power over who can or can't marry in the parish. 🙄 I mean, I honestly feel like people who actually belong to Holy Cross Parish should probably get priority when it comes to picking wedding dates—or at least the whole process should be consistent with that kind of logic, you know? But it just doesn't work that way, I guess. I can think of at least twenty different couples who have gotten married here over the last few years who don't have any real connection to the parish at all. And from what I can tell, most of them managed to snag their preferred dates simply because they happen to know someone who’s close with the priest. 🙄