Dana Brooks3 said:So, what makes you think your topic would actually be spared from all that constant bickering? Honestly, why would it be any different?
Even if some people out there would rather crawl back into the dark, the sun is still gonna shine regardless, you know? It doesn't care who it bothers.
I don't really expect most people to wrap their heads around the high-level mysticism and spiritual stuff I'm out here sharing so freely. But honestly? It’s not like I can force it even if I wanted to. You can't teach a blind man how to see until he finally opens his own eyes and sees it for himself, right?
So, from here on out, I’m just done. I’m not even going to bother responding to any more of that primitive nonsense. Honestly, I’ll probably barely react to those "intellectual" little jabs, either. Why bother? Because Sandra Palmer10 has completely outclassed them all. She’s moved way beyond using pure intellect anyway—that whole thing is such a limited tool when you're actually trying to focus on spiritual growth, don't you think?
Honestly, from where I’m sitting and just scanning through some of these threads, it kind of felt like this whole thing was being set up just to take a swing at Ivanov's school. You know? Like, was that the actual goal here?
So you’re calling yourself a master too, just like him? Well, honestly, you can’t really blame anyone for seeing that as a total provocation.
There’s really no point in arguing, because honestly, it’s all just one big mess. Besides, Ivanov’s "school" is right where it needs to be—perfectly positioned for the people who actually need it and just can't seem to figure things out on their own.
So, I call myself a "Grandmaster." Honestly? It’s just my way of poking fun at all those self-proclaimed spiritual gurus and those endless, ridiculous titles people love to throw around. You know the type—people who act like they're on some higher plane of existence, creating these massive, invisible walls between themselves and everyone else without even realizing they're doing it. It's just my little way of keeping things grounded, you know? Keeping it real.
So, think about it... if someone finally lets everything go—if they actually walk away from it all and realize they don't even truly own themselves anymore—can they really be expected to tie themselves down to some fancy title or a label? I mean, how does that even work?
So, if you already knew people were gonna jump in just to argue with you or start throwing shade again... why'd you go ahead and open it anyway?
Just asking.
Honestly, I don't really care if someone wants to stir the pot. It doesn't bother me one bit. People want to throw shade or start some drama? Let 'em. It’s all good.
You honestly couldn't wrap your head around it. I mean, I see things exactly for what they are, so I’ve reached this point where I’m just completely indifferent to the whole thing. It doesn't move me. But you know who it messes with? The people actually using it, the ones tied up in all that mess. That's where the real friction is.
Look, everyone just does what they can, you know? It is what it is.
I mean, really... why would I even get worked up at an ant that can't fly? What's the point in being mad at something like that?
Everyone just does what they can, right? It’s like, you give what you've got. But honestly? You just don't see the results. Where's the payoff?