The Game of Losing Yourself

1,2,3.... LOST!!! josh has you all!!

hiddenpuma75 said:It seems to me that when placidharbor7 used that particular phrase, he wasn't actually intending it as an insult, especially since he followed it up with a grinning emoji. 😬 Which one indicates that there was absolutely no intention to offend?

Look at it this way: in the real world, when someone completely runs out of actual arguments, they inevitably resort to nothing but profanity to close the conversation. It’s the ultimate sign of intellectual bankruptcy. 😉

Ultimately, you know exactly what’s happening to the Tower and its residents within the realm of Tarot. 😁

is it just like what happened with the Jews and the Nicodemus Tower and those two towers in NY?😍 😂😂

Ryan Wilson2 said:But look at it this way—in the real world, whenever someone completely runs out of actual points to make, they just resort to swearing and call it a day. That's how most dialogues end, isn't it? 😉

Besides, you know exactly what happens to the Tower and all its residents in the Tarot readings 😁

"A fool always has more than enough arguments."

Murphy - the Master's Law
________________________

A fool outweighs any number of arguments.
And what even counts as an argument? Smart people? So, does a fool outnumber the smart ones?
Is one single argument worth anything, or is it just worth two fools?
Or maybe having too many arguments actually weakens the whole point?
Maybe one argument is barely worth a tenth of a fool.
But what does that actually mean? What units are we using here, and how are we supposed to weigh this stuff?
If it's stupid enough, one fool is all you need, because an argument applied to a fool is invariant, just like an operator trace on a database display.
Man... oh, John...

Arthur Grant4 said:A fool outweighs any number of arguments.
But what even defines an argument? Is it just smart people? So, does that mean one fool carries more weight than a whole crowd of intellectuals?
Does a single solid point actually hold more value than two fools combined?
Or maybe there's a point where having too many arguments actually weakens the whole thing?
Could one good argument be worth just a tenth of a fool?
But wait, what does that even mean? What kind of units are we using here, and how on earth are we supposed to weigh them?
If something is foolish enough, then one fool is plenty, because an argument applied to a fool remains invariant—just like an operator trace on a database display.
Oh boy... oh John, oh John...

Don't go mixing deep philosophy into the small talk, my friend from way out in Africa.😬
Otherwise, someone might just recruit you as their little apprentice editor, haha!🙄

Joseph Davis5 said:I might actually lose Joseph Davis5 within the next hour.
So, until 5:35 PM, you guys can log in under the name Joseph Davis5 to post, delete, or even try to hijack the account. The password is: 4josephdavis5
let's see what happens...

Joseph Davis5 said:Someone set me up with a timer. 😁

I’m gonna pass out. 🤣🤣🤣

So that's how you imagined "losing yourself," huh?
If so, then no thanks. 😢
My whole identity is dedicated to this forum 🤣 and if they really wanted to mess with me, they'd have rigged something way more intense than just a clock, so I won't be playing along with you all. 😁

Jack Harris3 said:I'm done. 🤣🤣🤣

So that’s how you envisioned "losing yourself"?
If so, I'm out. 😢
My identity is tied to this forum, 🤣 and if they set an hourly rate higher than what we're doing here, I wouldn't even bother playing along with you people. 😁

Ha, did you think I was going to show up at your house and eat your dog and cat? 😬
Let the kids be happy; for some, losing a username would be worse than a tsunami hitting the coast.

It’s a damn shame nobody bothered to log in and swap out your password for you. 😂😂

Austin Hayes66 said:It's a shame nobody logged in to change your password for you. 😂😂

What can you do? It’s a polite world.😍