Traffic violation procedures

Taroth said:The car is always registered to one specific person—so that's who gets hit with the ticket... just like how you'd get served with an eviction notice for unpaid utilities if the lease is in your name, even if there are five other roommates living in the place...

The only way out is if one of the residents submits a signed statement admitting they were actually behind the wheel at that exact moment...

Who says?

You aren't a lawyer, you aren't a judge... sounds more like you're a cop to me... 🙂

I don't know anyone else who would just slap a fine on someone without proving they actually did it—unless it's the police, who seem to write their own laws that fly right in the face of the Constitution (ZSPC).

Jesus... so now the defendant has to prove they're innocent... instead of the prosecution having to prove they're guilty? ***Sic***

By the way—that comparison of yours is totally off base.

cut
.
.
.
cut

What is going on with this forum lately... is it just me, or is it lagging and double-posting everything?

Go ahead and complain. Give it everything you've got...

The best part was watching that college student's reaction. Pure comedy.

Liq was doing 75 on Minneapolis Boulevard, where the limit is 55. It’s hardly a crime when half the drivers out there are pushing 120 anyway... sure, it's technically illegal, but the penalty doesn't fit the crime.

Why don't you try sticking strictly to the speed limits on the NYC-Miami run, dear student... we can see how long it takes you to get anywhere.

Spider-Man said:So, I ended up killing someone with a knife the other day—actually, two people, one with a knife and the other with my bare hands, yikes—and now they're telling me I'm going to be arrested. But honestly, it wasn't like I killed them *that* much, just a little bit, and I've never even killed anyone before... can I file a complaint? 🙄

Oh, please, let's not get carried away with the drama here...
The guy was just driving about 30 miles per hour over the limit25 miles on a major highway where there aren't really any pedestrians, let alone kids... and you're actually comparing that to murder?
👏 👏

igrgic said:Is it worth skipping the ticket and fighting it in traffic court just to pay later, or should I just bite the bullet if I got caught speeding on the highway?
I got caught by a speed camera on my way into downtown, right across from the Turbo Grinder where I think the limit is lower. 50 miles/h Yeah, I’ve put in a few more miles myself. 75 milesI'm not sure what you're getting at with that. If you have something to say, just say it. Don't waste my time with half-finished thoughts.
If you're at 10 and get approved again, you're still looking at an overdraft. 19 milesWhat exactly are we talking about here? Give me some context. $167?
Is it the same? $167 If we're looking at an overage of 30 or 40... 31 miles/h?
And are there any other hidden fees attached to this?

I haven't picked up a single ticket yet, and I've been behind the wheel for about five years.

Look, I’d pay up... especially when I KNOW I’m the one at fault.🙂My attorney would definitely file an appeal. She’s always looking for something to complain about.😁

My guy’s registration expired exactly 5 days ago and the cops pulled us over today.
The officer wrote him a ticket $1667, but he didn't get any actual receipt or paperwork—he didn't even sign anything.

Is that even legal under the law?!
Someone please weigh in if you actually know what's up!! 🙏 🙏

Greetings to everyone. I would like to begin by laying out the circumstances of my situation from the very beginning. Last December, I was issued a citation for violating a restricted access zone—specifically, driving through an area marked for taxis and local residents only $100. Within the eight-day window provided, I submitted a formal appeal regarding this penalty. However, much to my surprise, I received a summons today requiring my appearance in court as the defendant. Is it standard procedure for the legal system to issue a court summons immediately following an appeal? I had anticipated receiving a simple notification stating whether my appeal was granted or denied, rather than being summoned to appear in person. Furthermore, if my appeal is ultimately rejected, what kind of legal fees and court costs should I expect to incur, and is my physical presence at the hearing mandatory? Thank you for any insight you can provide.

By being such a massive liar, you’ve basically gone and triggered a full-blown lawsuit
now you actually have to show up in court and try to convince some judge that you aren't guilty
if you manage to pull that off, you won't have to pay a dime

And what exactly will this little indulgence end up costing me if my appeal gets tossed out? I was just reading through some details, and it seems like I’d be looking at both the initial fine and $33 the court costs? It would certainly be a relief if the total amount stayed within that range. On another note, what kind of penalties am I facing if I fail to show up for the hearing? The documentation mentions that the case could be resolved in my absence unless my presence is specifically required under Section 130 of the State Code, yet right above that, it suggests they might actually bring me in by force. I find those two possibilities somewhat contradictory and frankly, a bit confusing.

amberbadger97 said:They’re saying they can just wrap this whole thing up without me showing up if my presence isn't strictly required under Section 130, but then they mention bringing me in by force if I don't show? I'm honestly pretty confused about how that works...

Section 130.

(1) Aside from the details covered in Section 129, subsections 2 and 3 of this Act, the summons sent to the defendant includes notice regarding the specific violation being charged, a warning that they are required to appear in person, and a warning that if they fail to appear, a warrant will be issued or, if the defendant's presence isn't deemed necessary for the hearing before the municipal court, a decision may be reached in their absence.

Does that make more sense now?... 🙂

amberbadger97 said:What kind of sanctions am I looking at if I just don't show up to court? It says here the case can be resolved without me if my presence isn't required under Section 130 of the Legal Code, but then right above that, it claims they'll drag me in by force? I'm a bit confused by the contradiction.

Early in the morning, two officers will show up at your door and transport you to the courthouse in a patrol car. If you try to put up a fight, they’ll simply take you into custody.

crimsonsailor7 said:Section 130.

(1) In addition to the information required by Section 129, subsections 2 and 3 of this Act, the summons shall include a notification of the specific violation being charged, a warning regarding the requirement for personal appearance, and a notice stating that failure to appear may result in the issuance of an arrest warrant or, should the defendant's presence not be legally required for the hearing before the municipal court, a decision rendered in their absence.

Is that any clearer? 🙂

Not really... it states they will issue an arrest warrant OR render a decision without them if their presence isn't deemed necessary? I find myself wondering, under what specific legal circumstances would a defendant's presence actually be considered unnecessary for such a proceeding?

Just head down to the courthouse and lay out your case—once you get the ruling, file an appeal. From there, it moves up to the higher misdemeanor court, and honestly, if you play your cards right, the whole thing will likely hit the statute of limitations after about two years from the date of the supposed "offense." The only real move worth making here is delaying the receipt of the official ruling. Whenever possible, just ignore the mail carrier and don't sign for those little slips of paper.

amberbadger97 said:no... does it say they'll issue a default judgmentOR will the decision be made in absentia if the defendant's presence isn't required? Like, under what specific circumstances is it okay for them to just decide without you being there???

look, your presence isn't actually mandatory if the court feels like they've got enough evidence on hand to rule on a misdemeanor... honestly though, it’s probably better to just show up and take your lumps...😁

About 21 months ago, I was cited for disorderly conduct following an altercation. After dealing with the misdemeanor court proceedings all through last year, I finally received notice today stating that I have to pay a fine into the state treasury. Now, I'm trying to figure out exactly when the clock started ticking on this case regarding the statute of limitations.
From what I understand, there’s a two-year window before a case expires. Is there any legal way to challenge this or push the whole thing into the realm of being statute-barred?😬

Thanks in advance for the help!

So, what does it actually say in your notice regarding the right to appeal?
The court has a two-year window to issue a ruling before the whole thing hits the statute of limitations. But since they've already handed down a decision in your case, I don't think expiration is even an issue anymore.

Just read the manual regarding legal remedies...

Everything you need is right there.

James Cox6 said:Just read the manual regarding legal remedies...

Everything you need is right there.

I’m actually completely in the dark on this one—where exactly can I find that information?

Thanks for the help, everyone! 👍

Angela Bailey74 said:I’m actually completely in the dark on this one—where exactly can I find that information?

Thanks for the help, everyone! 👍

Right at the very bottom of the page—just underneath the judge's signature and seal.

Angela Bailey74 said:About 21 months ago, I was cited for disorderly conduct following an altercation. After dealing with the misdemeanor court proceedings all through last year, I finally received notice today stating that I have to pay a fine into the state treasury. Now, I'm trying to figure out exactly when the clock started ticking on this case regarding the statute of limitations.
From what I understand, there’s a two-year window before a case expires. Is there any legal way to challenge this or push the whole thing into the realm of being statute-barred?😬

Thanks in advance for the help!

The statute of limitations kicks in exactly two years after the violation occurs. Check the report—what does it actually say about when you supposedly disturbed the peace?