#1 ·
Wait said:Did you all actually attend the board meeting, or are we just blindly following whatever that unnamed female political figure says? Seriously, can we try listening to both sides for once? Unless you’ve already decided that every single Republican is just out there committing crimes and stealing money, I don't know what to tell you. If that’s really how you see things, then maybe you just have a massive sheep complex. Is that it?
Is there even any point in talking about this? Seriously. said:So what if those people were on the committee? I've been there too. Look, they're the opposition, right? They’re all perfectly in sync when it comes to spinning lies and everything else. Honestly, nothing anyone said was actually scandalous—it was just the way those opposition types were acting that was the real problem.
I can't see the replies to these posts, so I'm just quoting here. I’m not trying to hit up Graybeard directly, but I really want to point out some things being said that seem to be flying totally under the radar. Don't you think they deserve more attention?
So, the first post talks about how the courts just automatically go after Republicans. Look, I’m not saying every single person in the party is out there stealing or committing crimes—I’ll leave some room for the idea that maybe a few people just grabbed an opportunity or were too incompetent to avoid trouble. But we have to look at that non-binding verdict against the entire party. It’s only "non-binding" because the whole organization worked together to build the systems and the environment necessary to stay untouchable forever. Makes sense, right?
But what about that whole "sheep to the slaughter" complex?
If you aren't with the Republican Party, do you just have a massive sheep complex? Like, seriously? Is that it?
I used to think they actually saw us as nothing more than easy targets, just sheep waiting to be sheared. But honestly? It seems to really bug them when we step up and prove that we aren't actually willing to play along with that whole inferiority complex. Isn't it funny how that works?
Sheep should just stick to bleating, right? Why bother having an actual opinion when you can just follow the herd?
Wait, so in that second post, this guy is actually claiming he was part of the inner circle at that unnamed organization?? Seriously?
I mean, at least that’s how you’d read it, right? Given there isn't a single comma in sight to help out, the word order feels more like a jumbled mess than an actual coherent sentence. Who even writes like that?
Basically, the whole point is that it doesn't even matter who else shows up to the board meeting, as long as the Republican Party has people in the room. At that point, their version of the truth is the only one that counts.
Look, I get wanting to hear both sides of the story. It sounds fair on paper, right? But here’s the kicker: only one side actually makes it to the public. We're only getting the critical perspective from a bunch of random, disconnected people. Where's the balance?
The other one, the "affirmative" type? She’s totally playing it safe and staying silent. Honestly, the public is being kept in the dark on stuff that really should be out in the open by now. Don't you think the head of the communications committee should at least step up and present an official stance on what actually happened?
So, this is the only thing we have from this supposed meeting attendee on this unnamed organization's site. According to this unnamed person, "they are the opposition"—which basically implies the entire opposition is just an unnamed organization set up to make things look democratic? And then there’s the part about them being "synchronized in their lying and everything else." So they're all just coordinated in their lies and whatever else that entails? Makes sense, right?
So basically, the opposition shouldn't even bother showing up to those committee meetings, right? And don't even get me started on those outside experts—they aren't really needed either. All they're expected to do is play along and help coordinate the lies. If that isn't how it works, then the whole thing is just a total scandal.
Sure, nothing says "professional patriotism" like throwing around tired clichés to discredit anyone who disagrees, right? It’s a great way to defend the one big party's agenda without ever being called out. Honestly, it feels like a watered-down version of North Korea's ideology. Though, if we're being real, North Korea actually has a much better production value—their whole system is more polished and they have a pre-packaged answer for every single scenario. It saves the politicians from having to actually think on their feet.