CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Why is everyone bashing Jocelyn, but nobody said a word about George W. Bush?

Why is everyone bashing Jocelyn, but nobody said a word about George W. Bush?

Started by mistyjackal14 · · 👁 10 views · 50 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants mistyjackal14mistytinker26Jerry Robinson56placidmarlin3Adam Collins4Sam RobinsonJoseph Peterson6Chris Diaz
Adam Collins4 Adam Collins4 Regular
502 messages
joined Apr 2013
#41 ·
mistyjackal14 said:You clearly didn't have a clue what was actually going on with ExxonMobil, though I suppose after looking through the links I sent, you finally grasp the situation enough to soften those rigid little "mechanisms" of yours, but then, like a stubborn child, instead of just admitting you were in the dark, you just resort to pointing fingers and saying "it's you, it's you." 🤣

Do you really have the nerve to look down your nose at me just because I’m offering what feels like a nursery rhyme—though, if we're being honest, perhaps that's exactly the level of intellectual depth one should expect from someone like you? argumentsHonestly, you can't even manage to answer a simple question meant for a child, can you?

At first, you didn't have the slightest clue about how one actually goes about buying ExxonMobil shares or the whole process involved, and now, suddenly, you seem completely lost as to why the Madars didn't just move in for a hostile takeover. Is it possible that we are all just missing the bigger picture here?

It isn't really all that shocking that you don't grasp why the Madars didn't just jump straight into a hostile takeover, is it? But what actually is a tragedy here—what’s truly unfortunate—is that you spent all that time pestering me about "mechanisms" when, in the end, you still don't understand the fundamental mechanism that forces the Madars to conduct their acquisitions through offshore funds.

Look, just admit that you don't actually know, and then I'll be more than happy to walk you through it myself. 😉

You clearly didn't have a clue what was actually going on with ExxonMobil, though I suppose after looking through the links I sent, you finally grasp the situation enough to soften those rigid little "mechanisms" of yours, but then, like a stubborn child, instead of just admitting you were in the dark, you just resort to pointing fingers and saying "it's you, it's you." 🤣

Do you really have the nerve to look down your nose at me just because I’m offering what feels like a nursery rhyme—though, if we're being honest, perhaps that's exactly the level of intellectual depth one should expect from someone like you? argumentsHonestly, you can't even manage to answer a simple question meant for a child, can you?

At first, you didn't have the slightest clue about how one actually goes about buying ExxonMobil shares or the whole process involved, and now, suddenly, you seem completely lost as to why the Madars didn't just move in for a hostile takeover. Is it possible that we are all just missing the bigger picture here?

It isn't really all that shocking that you don't grasp why the Madars didn't just jump straight into a hostile takeover, is it? But what actually is a tragedy here—what’s truly unfortunate—is that you spent all that time pestering me about "mechanisms" when, in the end, you still don't understand the fundamental mechanism that forces the Madars to conduct their acquisitions through offshore funds.

Look, just admit that you don't actually know, and then I'll be more than happy to walk you through it myself. 😉
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
Jerry Robinson56 Jerry Robinson56 Regular
320 messages
joined Apr 2013
#42 ·
mistyjackal14 said:That’s what I’m trying to tell you; you take Platini seriously, which is fine, and you don't take Kosor seriously, which is also fine.

But since you treat him with such gravity and believe everything he says, if you wanted to show that the other side feels the same way, you ought to provide a quote from them, not just from Platini.😉

Therefore, if you were to provide a link showing that Kosor intended to meet with Platini, explaining why she didn't, or anything along those lines, then I would be willing to admit my mistake.

Until then, you should accept the fact that Kosor turned away from Platini twice when he made his demands, while others were receiving him with expedited service and allowing him to look down upon the country and its people.

http://www.nytimes.com/articles/article-14548.html
After spending about ten minutes slowly making his way toward the White House, Michel Platini turned his car around and left Old Town entirely. This implies the meeting with the Prime Minister was canceled due to the protests. It seems they simply weren't meant to be; this marks the second time Platini has visited Washington, D.C., only to fail in reaching Jadranka Kosor.

Mladen Pavić, spokesperson for The Government, confirmed the reports from journalists, noting that Monsieur Platini preferred to head off to dinner instead.

"There will be no meeting at the White House given the current situation. We don't yet know if the Prime Minister and Platini will reschedule," the spokesperson stated.

😂I truly feel like I have to repeat myself twenty-three times for you to understand. Perhaps you could simply assert that the J. f. K. spokesperson is a liar?
Either we agree on that, or you are simply clueless about what is being discussed.

I have no desire to gloat, but it is frankly shameful to see you being so pedantic.
Frankly, I am fed up with both of them. Kosor was left hanging by a mountain of empty promises; you could see the look on her face when she walked out of the White House after being told the meeting was off. For the French, however, a good dinner always takes precedence over politics.

Regardless, 👍 you are a decent enough person.
mistyjackal14 mistyjackal14 Active MemberOP
73 messages
joined Aug 2012
#43 ·
Adam Collins4 said:You clearly didn't have a clue what was actually going on with ExxonMobil, though I suppose after looking through the links I sent, you finally grasp the situation enough to soften those rigid little "mechanisms" of yours, but then, like a stubborn child, instead of just admitting you were in the dark, you just resort to pointing fingers and saying "it's you, it's you." 🤣

Do you really have the nerve to look down your nose at me just because I’m offering what feels like a nursery rhyme—though, if we're being honest, perhaps that's exactly the level of intellectual depth one should expect from someone like you? argumentsHonestly, you can't even manage to answer a simple question meant for a child, can you?

At first, you didn't have the slightest clue about how one actually goes about buying ExxonMobil shares or the whole process involved, and now, suddenly, you seem completely lost as to why the Madars didn't just move in for a hostile takeover. Is it possible that we are all just missing the bigger picture here?

It isn't really all that shocking that you don't grasp why the Madars didn't just jump straight into a hostile takeover, is it? But what actually is a tragedy here—what’s truly unfortunate—is that you spent all that time pestering me about "mechanisms" when, in the end, you still don't understand the fundamental mechanism that forces the Madars to conduct their acquisitions through offshore funds.

Look, just admit that you don't actually know, and then I'll be more than happy to walk you through it myself. 😉

We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
mistyjackal14 mistyjackal14 Active MemberOP
73 messages
joined Aug 2012
#44 ·
Jerry Robinson56 said:http://www.nytimes.com/articles/article-14548.html
After spending about ten minutes slowly making his way toward the White House, Michel Platini turned his car around and left Old Town entirely. This implies the meeting with the Prime Minister was canceled due to the protests. It seems they simply weren't meant to be; this marks the second time Platini has visited Washington, D.C., only to fail in reaching Jadranka Kosor.

Mladen Pavić, spokesperson for The Government, confirmed the reports from journalists, noting that Monsieur Platini preferred to head off to dinner instead.

"There will be no meeting at the White House given the current situation. We don't yet know if the Prime Minister and Platini will reschedule," the spokesperson stated.

😂I truly feel like I have to repeat myself twenty-three times for you to understand. Perhaps you could simply assert that the J. f. K. spokesperson is a liar?
Either we agree on that, or you are simply clueless about what is being discussed.

I have no desire to gloat, but it is frankly shameful to see you being so pedantic.
Frankly, I am fed up with both of them. Kosor was left hanging by a mountain of empty promises; you could see the look on her face when she walked out of the White House after being told the meeting was off. For the French, however, a good dinner always takes precedence over politics.

Regardless, 👍 you are a decent enough person.

Well, at least we're making some progress.🙂

But I have to play devil's advocate for a moment because these sources seem a bit thin, wouldn't you say? Specifically, it looks like it's just National (and maybe Index?) reporting this.😉

Everyone else is writing about Michel Platini, yet only one single outlet is pushing this specific narrative you're describing, which feels a little flimsy to me.
Though, I'm sure you'll eventually find some announcement regarding a meeting between the Prime Minister (not even a cabinet minister, mind you) and Michel Platini.🙂

(To be honest, I can't stand that guy ever since he made such a fool of himself with Edward; this latest obsession with demanding meetings with officials just so he can look down his nose at us is just adding insult to injury.)
Jerry Robinson56 Jerry Robinson56 Regular
320 messages
joined Apr 2013
#45 ·

mistyjackal14 said:Well, at least we're making some progress.🙂

But I have to play devil's advocate for a moment because these sources seem a bit thin, wouldn't you say? Specifically, it looks like it's just National (and maybe Index?) reporting this.😉

Everyone else is writing about Michel Platini, yet only one single outlet is pushing this specific narrative you're describing, which feels a little flimsy to me.
Though, I'm sure you'll eventually find some announcement regarding a meeting between the Prime Minister (not even a cabinet minister, mind you) and Michel Platini.🙂

(To be honest, I can't stand that guy ever since he made such a fool of himself with Edward; this latest obsession with demanding meetings with officials just so he can look down his nose at us is just adding insult to injury.)

You clearly didn't read that closely. I am providing this for the twenty-fourth time, just for you—and yes, I am aware of the distinction between singular and plural.


mistyjackal14 said:Well, at least we're making some progress.🙂

But I have to play devil's advocate for a moment because these sources seem a bit thin, wouldn't you say? Specifically, it looks like it's just National (and maybe Index?) reporting this.😉

Everyone else is writing about Michel Platini, yet only one single outlet is pushing this specific narrative you're describing, which feels a little flimsy to me.
Though, I'm sure you'll eventually find some announcement regarding a meeting between the Prime Minister (not even a cabinet minister, mind you) and Michel Platini.🙂

(To be honest, I can't stand that guy ever since he made such a fool of himself with Edward; this latest obsession with demanding meetings with officials just so he can look down his nose at us is just adding insult to injury.)

We all know Jadranka Kosor has a certain... loose relationship with the truth, but it seems like the speaker might actually be telling it straight this time. If anyone wants to verify whether Jadranka Kosor is being disingenuous, I suppose I’d have to take it up with her personally. 😛.
It is entirely inconsequential at this stage. Even now, they have turned their sights on Putin. 🤣

I have nothing to add to what was previously stated.
mistyjackal14 said:Well, at least we're making some progress.🙂

But I have to play devil's advocate for a moment because these sources seem a bit thin, wouldn't you say? Specifically, it looks like it's just National (and maybe Index?) reporting this.😉

Everyone else is writing about Michel Platini, yet only one single outlet is pushing this specific narrative you're describing, which feels a little flimsy to me.
Though, I'm sure you'll eventually find some announcement regarding a meeting between the Prime Minister (not even a cabinet minister, mind you) and Michel Platini.🙂

(To be honest, I can't stand that guy ever since he made such a fool of himself with Edward; this latest obsession with demanding meetings with officials just so he can look down his nose at us is just adding insult to injury.)

As I have previously stated, one learns quickly that Jadranka Kosor is rather loose with her choice of words. And I am not merely offering an opinion here; these are documented facts:

The current political climate surrounding the recent decisions made by the Government has become increasingly predictable, though no less exhausting. It seems we are once again witnessing the inevitable fallout from policies that were drafted behind closed doors, far removed from the scrutiny of the public eye. One cannot help but feel a sense of profound weariness when watching the same players move across the board, executing maneuvers that serve specific interests rather than the common good. It is quite telling how much influence certain individuals continue to wield within the halls of power in Washington, D.C. While the administration attempts to project an image of stability and progress, the underlying reality is one of fragmentation and calculated maneuvering. We see the same patterns repeating themselves—promises made during election cycles that evaporate the moment they reach the White House. There is a particular cynicism required to navigate today’s news cycle without losing one's composure. When you look at the way ExxonMobil and other major corporate entities interact with federal regulators, the "coincidence" of their shared interests becomes almost too obvious to ignore. It isn't just about policy; it's about the architecture of influence that has been built over decades. I find myself reflecting on the sheer scale of the inefficiency. We are told that these shifts in direction are necessary for national security or economic growth, yet the results rarely align with the rhetoric. It feels less like leadership and more like a perpetual exercise in damage control. One must wonder if anyone in the upper echelons of the government actually believes the scripts they are reading, or if it is simply a matter of maintaining the status quo until the next cycle begins. It is a tiresome dance, and frankly, most of us have seen the choreography before.

You have stumbled once again.

You asked for it, and now you have it. Since you’re so insistent, go ahead and demand a formal retraction from the J. f. K. spokesperson yourself.
Don't make a fool of yourself. This was your move.

lp


mistyjackal14 mistyjackal14 Active MemberOP
73 messages
joined Aug 2012
#46 ·
Jerry Robinson56 said:You clearly didn't read that closely. I am providing this for the twenty-fourth time, just for you—and yes, I am aware of the distinction between singular and plural.

We all know Jadranka Kosor has a certain... loose relationship with the truth, but it seems like the speaker might actually be telling it straight this time. If anyone wants to verify whether Jadranka Kosor is being disingenuous, I suppose I’d have to take it up with her personally. 😛.
It is entirely inconsequential at this stage. Even now, they have turned their sights on Putin. 🤣

I have nothing to add to what was previously stated.

As I have previously stated, one learns quickly that Jadranka Kosor is rather loose with her choice of words. And I am not merely offering an opinion here; these are documented facts:

The current political climate surrounding the recent decisions made by the Government has become increasingly predictable, though no less exhausting. It seems we are once again witnessing the inevitable fallout from policies that were drafted behind closed doors, far removed from the scrutiny of the public eye. One cannot help but feel a sense of profound weariness when watching the same players move across the board, executing maneuvers that serve specific interests rather than the common good. It is quite telling how much influence certain individuals continue to wield within the halls of power in Washington, D.C. While the administration attempts to project an image of stability and progress, the underlying reality is one of fragmentation and calculated maneuvering. We see the same patterns repeating themselves—promises made during election cycles that evaporate the moment they reach the White House. There is a particular cynicism required to navigate today’s news cycle without losing one's composure. When you look at the way ExxonMobil and other major corporate entities interact with federal regulators, the "coincidence" of their shared interests becomes almost too obvious to ignore. It isn't just about policy; it's about the architecture of influence that has been built over decades. I find myself reflecting on the sheer scale of the inefficiency. We are told that these shifts in direction are necessary for national security or economic growth, yet the results rarely align with the rhetoric. It feels less like leadership and more like a perpetual exercise in damage control. One must wonder if anyone in the upper echelons of the government actually believes the scripts they are reading, or if it is simply a matter of maintaining the status quo until the next cycle begins. It is a tiresome dance, and frankly, most of us have seen the choreography before.

You have stumbled once again.

You asked for it, and now you have it. Since you’re so insistent, go ahead and demand a formal retraction from the J. f. K. spokesperson yourself.
Don't make a fool of yourself. This was your move.

lp



I'll admit I was skeptical at first, but seeing as the news has been published and it's being discussed here as well, I suppose it must be accurate. 😂🤣

In light of everything, I'm going to revise my theory about how the "Prime Minister snubbed Michel Platini twice" into something a bit more logical:
The Prime Minister requested that Michel Platini attend the meeting, but the relevant minister essentially locked her in the restroom so he could handle the meeting himself; then, feeling quite slighted, she ended up practically begging Michel Platini to come back, but unfortunately his car got stuck in a pedestrian zone near the Square, and he couldn't make it through the stone gates on Radicev because of the protesters. 🤣.

P.S.
Since you seem to be a bit of a newcomer to the internet, let me offer a small piece of advice. That thing you shared is really just a link reposted story taken from an article in National.😉
Jerry Robinson56 Jerry Robinson56 Regular
320 messages
joined Apr 2013
#47 ·
👍 I am relieved to find that my initial assessment of your character was correct.

mistyjackal14 said:I'll admit I was skeptical at first, but seeing as the news has been published and it's being discussed here as well, I suppose it must be accurate. 😂🤣

In light of everything, I'm going to revise my theory about how the "Prime Minister snubbed Michel Platini twice" into something a bit more logical:
The Prime Minister requested that Michel Platini attend the meeting, but the relevant minister essentially locked her in the restroom so he could handle the meeting himself; then, feeling quite slighted, she ended up practically begging Michel Platini to come back, but unfortunately his car got stuck in a pedestrian zone near the Square, and he couldn't make it through the stone gates on Radicev because of the protesters. 🤣.

P.S.
Since you seem to be a bit of a newcomer to the internet, let me offer a small piece of advice. That thing you shared is really just a link reposted story taken from an article in National.😉

Let us approach this from the bottom up; perhaps then it will penetrate your consciousness.
I appreciate the assistance, and I am glad to see you reading my contributions, as I certainly read yours. 👍

mistyjackal14 said:I'll admit I was skeptical at first, but seeing as the news has been published and it's being discussed here as well, I suppose it must be accurate. 😂🤣

In light of everything, I'm going to revise my theory about how the "Prime Minister snubbed Michel Platini twice" into something a bit more logical:
The Prime Minister requested that Michel Platini attend the meeting, but the relevant minister essentially locked her in the restroom so he could handle the meeting himself; then, feeling quite slighted, she ended up practically begging Michel Platini to come back, but unfortunately his car got stuck in a pedestrian zone near the Square, and he couldn't make it through the stone gates on Radicev because of the protesters. 🤣.

P.S.
Since you seem to be a bit of a newcomer to the internet, let me offer a small piece of advice. That thing you shared is really just a link reposted story taken from an article in National.😉

First, you did receive the link.

2. It is a pity you failed to notice that the key figure in this drama is Mladen Pavić, rather than J. f. K., who refused to budge regarding Platinia's decision to attend a dinner instead of honoring his commitments. He confirmed everything I have stated to you. Or are you suggesting that Mladen Pavić, the spokesperson for Jadranka Kosor, is also incapable of telling the truth?

mistyjackal14 said:I'll admit I was skeptical at first, but seeing as the news has been published and it's being discussed here as well, I suppose it must be accurate. 😂🤣

In light of everything, I'm going to revise my theory about how the "Prime Minister snubbed Michel Platini twice" into something a bit more logical:
The Prime Minister requested that Michel Platini attend the meeting, but the relevant minister essentially locked her in the restroom so he could handle the meeting himself; then, feeling quite slighted, she ended up practically begging Michel Platini to come back, but unfortunately his car got stuck in a pedestrian zone near the Square, and he couldn't make it through the stone gates on Radicev because of the protesters. 🤣.

P.S.
Since you seem to be a bit of a newcomer to the internet, let me offer a small piece of advice. That thing you shared is really just a link reposted story taken from an article in National.😉

🤣 As I have already mentioned, I find you quite agreeable.

Two wrongs make a right, regardless of how much they attempt to silence the fact.

mistyjackal14 said:I'll admit I was skeptical at first, but seeing as the news has been published and it's being discussed here as well, I suppose it must be accurate. 😂🤣

In light of everything, I'm going to revise my theory about how the "Prime Minister snubbed Michel Platini twice" into something a bit more logical:
The Prime Minister requested that Michel Platini attend the meeting, but the relevant minister essentially locked her in the restroom so he could handle the meeting himself; then, feeling quite slighted, she ended up practically begging Michel Platini to come back, but unfortunately his car got stuck in a pedestrian zone near the Square, and he couldn't make it through the stone gates on Radicev because of the protesters. 🤣.

P.S.
Since you seem to be a bit of a newcomer to the internet, let me offer a small piece of advice. That thing you shared is really just a link reposted story taken from an article in National.😉

😲 seriously?
Poor J. f. K., look at what they're putting her through. And you claim she's on her knees? I feel like I've heard rumors elsewhere that she's practically throwing herself at men. If she's down on her knees, how is she supposed to reach him? You've left me a bit perplexed. Do you have some sort of logical explanation for this discrepancy?
Adam Collins4 Adam Collins4 Regular
502 messages
joined Apr 2013
#48 ·
mistyjackal14 said:We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂

We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
It's been a few days, and still... radio silence.

So, come on, enlighten us—how exactly did Jadranka Kosor play a part in any of this?

And specifically, how much credit does she deserve for the shares on the open market? (A concept you obviously hadn't considered until I brought it up, though even then, you'd claim Jadranka Kosor was responsible for that too...)🤣

Look, either lay out her actual contributions or just admit you don't know... because from where I'm sitting, you don't have a clue, you're just following orders to glorify Jadranka Kosor.
mistyjackal14 mistyjackal14 Active MemberOP
73 messages
joined Aug 2012
#49 ·
Adam Collins4 said:We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂

We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
It's been a few days, and still... radio silence.

So, come on, enlighten us—how exactly did Jadranka Kosor play a part in any of this?

And specifically, how much credit does she deserve for the shares on the open market? (A concept you obviously hadn't considered until I brought it up, though even then, you'd claim Jadranka Kosor was responsible for that too...)🤣

Look, either lay out her actual contributions or just admit you don't know... because from where I'm sitting, you don't have a clue, you're just following orders to glorify Jadranka Kosor.
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
It's been a few days, and still... radio silence.

So, come on, enlighten us—how exactly did Jadranka Kosor play a part in any of this?

And specifically, how much credit does she deserve for the shares on the open market? (A concept you obviously hadn't considered until I brought it up, though even then, you'd claim Jadranka Kosor was responsible for that too...)🤣

Look, either lay out her actual contributions or just admit you don't know... because from where I'm sitting, you don't have a clue, you're just following orders to glorify Jadranka Kosor.
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
We're still sitting here waiting for an answer as to which specific "mechanisms" Kosor used to block the ExxonMobil takeover...☕

Don't even get me started on the links, because it's blindingly obvious you haven't read them. Otherwise, you wouldn't be claiming that "heroic Jadranka Kosor"—who was a week late to react and clearly had no idea what was happening—suddenly fixed everything single-handedly...😂
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
It's been a few days, and still... radio silence.

So, come on, enlighten us—how exactly did Jadranka Kosor play a part in any of this?

And specifically, how much credit does she deserve for the shares on the open market? (A concept you obviously hadn't considered until I brought it up, though even then, you'd claim Jadranka Kosor was responsible for that too...)🤣

Look, either lay out her actual contributions or just admit you don't know... because from where I'm sitting, you don't have a clue, you're just following orders to glorify Jadranka Kosor.
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
I've already mentioned this before (to someone else on this board, actually), but everyone was actually in agreement regarding the takeover, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

When we talk about a concrete "mechanism" as a way for The Government to block an acquisition, that concept really only becomes relevant in the context of a hostile takeover, doesn't it?

But clearly, you don't quite grasp the reasoning behind why that would be necessary or how such a mechanism even functions. 🍿
It's been a few days, and still... radio silence.

So, come on, enlighten us—how exactly did Jadranka Kosor play a part in any of this?

And specifically, how much credit does she deserve for the shares on the open market? (A concept you obviously hadn't considered until I brought it up, though even then, you'd claim Jadranka Kosor was responsible for that too...)🤣

Look, either lay out her actual contributions or just admit you don't know... because from where I'm sitting, you don't have a clue, you're just following orders to glorify Jadranka Kosor.
It's been a few days, and still... radio silence.

So, come on, enlighten us—how exactly did Jadranka Kosor play a part in any of this?

And specifically, how much credit does she deserve for the shares on the open market? (A concept you obviously hadn't considered until I brought it up, though even then, you'd claim Jadranka Kosor was responsible for that too...)🤣

Look, either lay out her actual contributions or just admit you don't know... because from where I'm sitting, you don't have a clue, you're just following orders to glorify Jadranka Kosor.
I’ve already mentioned to someone else on this board that everyone was actually in agreement regarding the stock, including the opposition, so it seems the only person left out of the loop was you, which explains why you're feeling so slighted right now.

Besides, the whole idea of a specific "mechanism" that The Government would need to use to block an acquisition only really matters when we're talking about a hostile takeover.

But clearly, you haven't the slightest idea why that mechanism exists or what it actually does. 🍿
Chris Diaz Chris Diaz Newcomer
7 messages
joined Apr 2013
#50 ·
democracy is😉
Jerry Robinson56 Jerry Robinson56 Regular
320 messages
joined Apr 2013
#51 ·
J. f. K. says: nobody gets more than a 50% stake in ExxonMobil 😂 😂 😂

It looks like crazy John is just playing games while trying to hoard up shares.

Ha, mistyjackal14, care to offer a little clarification on that?

How many times does Adam Collins4 have to knock sense into you?

Are you actually prepared to face the truth this time?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads