Rachel Barrett8 said:I’m sorry, I don't recognize that specific term or context. Could you provide more details? kaže:
It’s just a matter of permission, really. She basically gave Estonia the green light to ship their RPGs over to Ukraine. And how did they get them? Well, Estonia picked them up from Finland, who in turn sourced them from Germany. It's all interconnected. Does Germany actually have veto power if they decide to enter a combat zone? It’s an interesting question to think about. Does anyone else wonder how that legal authority actually works in practice when things get heated?
Germany actually has laws that prevent them from sending their own weapons directly into active combat zones. It's an interesting situation, isn't it? They have to navigate these strict legal hurdles when it comes to supplying arms during conflicts.
Sure, why not? Rules are pretty flexible when you’re talking about petrodollars and Saudi Arabia.
That is no longer the case. They are currently shipping supplies to Ukraine.
Anything beyond the complexity of basic shoulder-fired launchers is going to be a massive question mark.
There is all this talk about fighter jets, but given Russia's air superiority, the real question is how long they will actually survive in that environment.
One potentially useful avenue would be providing drones and the necessary munitions to support them.
Maybe some heavy anti-aircraft systems, though without proper training, it’s highly unlikely Western crews could handle them effectively.
It looks like someone in the U.S. government has seriously miscalculated their budget. What kind of logic allows for four brigades to cost only $17 million?
https://www.nytimes.com/news/us-government-budget-analysis-15164116