#2061 ·
Jonathan Barnes5 said:Trying to counter your arguments is a complete paradox, seeing as you haven't actually refuted anything yourself. You’ve simply posited a theory about an alternative history—the kind people write entire books and academic papers on. I really hope someone isn't just deleting everything here.😁
It's all quite pointless; if I had dared to suggest the resistance didn't exist back in 1945, it would have been treated like the end of the world, yet even if you stood atop Mount Rainier, could you truly prove such a thing? He just threw out a few tired clichés and insulted me simply because I shared my perspective on how things might have unfolded, explicitly noting it was merely an alternative projection, and yet you find yourself siding with him purely because he shares your conservative leanings. Honestly, I'm a bit disappointed; I follow your posts in other threads and always found you much sharper, even though I disagree with about 95% of your takes.
And sure, feel free to delete everything, provided there's actually a moderator active around here.