CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Blood Diamond

Blood Diamond

Started by redowl90 · · 👁 4 views · 43 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants redowl90Joshua Bennett4Zachary Thompson2Elizabeth Garcia2Betty Ward6Kate Taylor2neoncanyon39hollowhawk15Jose Miller17wanderingcrane0Arthur Graywiredranger30feralnomad99Gary Grant2Raymond HughesWalter Fowler53Elizabeth Ruiz65nimblemarlin6wiredsurfer72AAndrew Harris7nimblemarlin17ironheron73Gary Kelly8 …
redowl90 redowl90 RegularOP
287 messages
joined Aug 2005
#1 ·
Watched a movie yesterday and I have to say, Leonardo DiCaprio and Djimon Hounsou were impressive, even if the directing felt a bit all over the place... The action sequences are brilliant, but looking at the film as a whole, there are just too many "ups and downs," if you know what I mean...
The movie runs for 140 minutes and really earns the label of being somewhat epic; so much happens, so many people die, and it jumps through so many locations, all because of MONEY... Dammit...

Anyway, I'd recommend it...
Joshua Bennett4 Joshua Bennett4 Active Member
53 messages
joined Sep 2008
#2 ·
In that commercial, I think it was actually the first time I ever saw Leonardo DiCaprio look like a grown man... ☕
Now that both he and Djimon Hounsou have landed nominations and an Oscar, I’m really getting hooked on this movie! 🙏
Zachary Thompson2 Zachary Thompson2 Member
26 messages
joined Apr 2005
#3 ·
Such a fantastic movie... honestly, it’s what you’d expect, given that Leonardo DiCaprio has been picking such incredible projects lately.
I actually ended up watching it twice within a week, and it holds up beautifully on the second viewing. It's exactly like redowl90 said—so much happens in those 140 minutes that there isn't a single dull moment. And even though it falls into that "movie with a moral at the end" category, it manages to avoid being overly sappy or melodramatic.

Definitely watch it. If you don't do it for anything else, do it for Jennifer Connelly. 😍
Elizabeth Garcia2 Elizabeth Garcia2 Active Member
53 messages
joined Apr 2005
#4 ·
Nah, thanks.
I don't really watch movies by Edward Zwick anymore.
I made a promise to myself after that irritating The Last Samurai... Zwick got on my nerves so much (and honestly, T. C. too) that I almost just walked out of the theater right then and there.
Zwick is just one of those politically correct Hollywood craftsmen... a poser, really, all style and no substance. I wouldn't even say he lacks talent, per se, but whatever talent he actually has is just completely misdirected.
I can't stand The Last Samurai, and I absolutely despise Legend of Autumn.
As for Blood Diamond, I'm skipping that one.
Betty Ward6 Betty Ward6 Newcomer
7 messages
joined May 2007
#5 ·
I find myself agreeing regarding Legend of Autumn, and specifically The Last Samurai
though I believe the primary fault lies with the screenwriters
this time around, the script holds up, allowing Zwick to truly deliver his best work
Blood Diamond is an excellent film, even if the action sequences feel somewhat unrealistic
but then again, that is just Hollywood for you😁
Kate Taylor2 Kate Taylor2 Member
23 messages
joined Apr 2007
#6 ·
It’s genuinely vital that the film's message reaches the public 👍
Actors should feel a real sense of fulfillment when they pour everything they have into themes like this—topics that rarely break through the noise of typical commercial blockbusters

Every Cast 😎
I really hope they take home an Oscar 🙂
neoncanyon39 neoncanyon39 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Dec 2006
#7 ·
Honestly, I found the movie a little too sugary for such a heavy subject... 3/5 ...
I've always had respect for Leonardo DiCaprio, though. I don't see him as some teen idol at all; he's a serious, talented actor in my book...
hollowhawk15 hollowhawk15 Member
19 messages
joined Jul 2004
#8 ·
Zachary Thompson2 said:Such a fantastic movie... honestly, it’s what you’d expect, given that Leonardo DiCaprio has been picking such incredible projects lately.
I actually ended up watching it twice within a week, and it holds up beautifully on the second viewing. It's exactly like redowl90 said—so much happens in those 140 minutes that there isn't a single dull moment. And even though it falls into that "movie with a moral at the end" category, it manages to avoid being overly sappy or melodramatic.

Definitely watch it. If you don't do it for anything else, do it for Jennifer Connelly. 😍

That’s exactly what I was getting at, because while some of his more recent stuff hasn't been great, I really think he gave a high-quality performance here, though maybe he's just hitting a bit of a rough patch lately, isn't he?
Jose Miller17 Jose Miller17 Active Member
162 messages
joined Sep 2003
#9 ·
I honestly don't get how this role is supposed to top his performance in The Departed. How? ...Anyway, the movie is a pass for me... there are some great moments (mostly the "kid stuff") but they get buried under mountains of filler... it’s too long, too much of everything, just way too much... what a brilliant review... and man, the political correctness is enough to make you lose it, just so nobody accidentally gets offended... though I guess we won't see Washington or London setting up specific departments just to pay for Africa... Zwick just lacks guts, plain and simple... not that I understand which demographic the diamond critics are trying to hit, but whatever... Puff Daddy is definitely going to be sweating bullets after watching this.
on the bright side, there's Jennifer Connelly :-)
wanderingcrane0 wanderingcrane0 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jan 2007
#10 ·
This movie is absolutely phenomenal. I went to catch it with my best friend the other day and I was just blown away. The themes are so heavy and thought-provoking; I found myself sitting there in deep reflection, questioning everything as the credits rolled. 👍
Arthur Gray Arthur Gray Member
13 messages
joined Jan 2003
#11 ·
Watched it yesterday... Honestly, I was pretty blown away. The beginning drags a bit, feels kind of slow, but once things actually start moving, it gets interesting. Leonardo DiCaprio killed it, and Djimon Hounsou was just as great. Jennifer Connelly? Not really for me. I don't know, she felt like the weakest link in the whole cast to my eyes. The locations were absolutely stunning, though. And look, I’ve never been much of a fan of diamonds, but after this, I think I like them even less than before...
wiredranger30 wiredranger30 Member
33 messages
joined Dec 2006
#12 ·
Arthur Gray said:Watched it yesterday... Honestly, I was pretty blown away. The beginning drags a bit, feels kind of slow, but once things actually start moving, it gets interesting. Leonardo DiCaprio killed it, and Djimon Hounsou was just as great. Jennifer Connelly? Not really for me. I don't know, she felt like the weakest link in the whole cast to my eyes. The locations were absolutely stunning, though. And look, I’ve never been much of a fan of diamonds, but after this, I think I like them even less than before...

What exactly is "wrong" with her performance? I get the feeling this isn't even your own take—it feels more like you stumbled upon some critic's review online and decided to play along. If I'm wrong, then walk me through it: what specifically did she miss the mark on? From where I'm sitting, her acting was perfectly fine.

As for the movie itself, it's a decent enough watch, but let's not pretend it's some cinematic masterpiece.
feralnomad99 feralnomad99 Member
16 messages
joined Nov 2007
#13 ·
I was watching a movie yesterday, and I have to say, it was probably one of the absolute best films I've managed to sit through in this past year 👍 👍 👍 Honestly, Leonardo DiCaprio completely blew me away, and I suppose from now on, I’ll be looking at him in a somewhat different light as an actor; even though his performance in Catch Me If You Can wasn't half bad, and neither was The Departed, he truly outdid himself here, and if you ask me, it might just be his finest role to date. You should definitely give this film a watch
Arthur Gray Arthur Gray Member
13 messages
joined Jan 2003
#14 ·
wiredranger30 said:What exactly is "wrong" with her performance? I get the feeling this isn't even your own take—it feels more like you stumbled upon some critic's review online and decided to play along. If I'm wrong, then walk me through it: what specifically did she miss the mark on? From where I'm sitting, her acting was perfectly fine.

As for the movie itself, it's a decent enough watch, but let's not pretend it's some cinematic masterpiece.

Jennifer Connelly. Man, Jennifer Connelly. There's just something about her presence, her character, her whole vibe, that doesn't click for me. She might be a great actress, sure, but what does that matter if I find her incredibly irritating to watch? (And yeah, there are a few others like that too). By the way, I don't go out of my way to read movie critics just to decide if a film is good or not. It’s simple: if a critic can't stand Jennifer Connelly, then by pure coincidence, neither can I, regardless of the movie. Let's just call it a difference in taste...
wiredranger30 wiredranger30 Member
33 messages
joined Dec 2006
#15 ·
Arthur Gray said:Jennifer Connelly. Man, Jennifer Connelly. There's just something about her presence, her character, her whole vibe, that doesn't click for me. She might be a great actress, sure, but what does that matter if I find her incredibly irritating to watch? (And yeah, there are a few others like that too). By the way, I don't go out of my way to read movie critics just to decide if a film is good or not. It’s simple: if a critic can't stand Jennifer Connelly, then by pure coincidence, neither can I, regardless of the movie. Let's just call it a difference in taste...

Regarding the critics—I wasn't actually reading reviews; I just assumed someone out there had already trashed her, because your comment feels almost like a direct quote from somewhere else given how contradictory it is. Look, of course everyone has their own preferences—people are going to like or dislike certain things, it's all subjective. But whether an actor delivers a solid performance is an objective matter, regardless of whether you find them grating or not. You're conflating two different concepts here, because you stated: Leonardo DiCaprio did a great job, Djimon Hounsou did too, but Connelly did not.. That leads to the inescapable conclusion that you weren't satisfied with her acting. Just because she's irritating to you doesn't mean she isn't a skilled actress. You clearly misspoken. For instance, I find Jack Nicholson absolutely infuriating—I can't stand his screen presence—but I certainly wouldn't claim he's a bad actor; quite the opposite, he's extraordinary.😉
Arthur Gray Arthur Gray Member
13 messages
joined Jan 2003
#16 ·
wiredranger30 said:Regarding the critics—I wasn't actually reading reviews; I just assumed someone out there had already trashed her, because your comment feels almost like a direct quote from somewhere else given how contradictory it is. Look, of course everyone has their own preferences—people are going to like or dislike certain things, it's all subjective. But whether an actor delivers a solid performance is an objective matter, regardless of whether you find them grating or not. You're conflating two different concepts here, because you stated: Leonardo DiCaprio did a great job, Djimon Hounsou did too, but Connelly did not.. That leads to the inescapable conclusion that you weren't satisfied with her acting. Just because she's irritating to you doesn't mean she isn't a skilled actress. You clearly misspoken. For instance, I find Jack Nicholson absolutely infuriating—I can't stand his screen presence—but I certainly wouldn't claim he's a bad actor; quite the opposite, he's extraordinary.😉

Yeah, I get what you're getting at... In my head, I usually lump those two things together. Annoying equals bad. But honestly, I don't know, there's just always something missing with her for me. Even when I saw her in Good Will Hunting—where she basically raked in all the praise—something just felt off. She didn't click with me then either, which is why I wrote not next to her name... And just to reiterate, I still find her irritating.
Gary Grant2 Gary Grant2 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Sep 2006
#17 ·
I watched this with my friends yesterday, and I was absolutely floored! 😍 Honestly, we all sat there in stunned silence, just completely moved by what we saw...
It is a film that is undeniably worth your time!
As for Leonardo DiCaprio, he has truly undergone a transformation; he has become more profound, more seasoned, and more mature. It seems to me that he grows more capable as an actor with every passing year—much like a fine vintage wine improves with age (😬 haha)—and that evolution is palpable in this performance.
I sincerely hope he takes home the Oscar for Best Actor; he has earned it through sheer merit. 😍
Raymond Hughes Raymond Hughes Newcomer
7 messages
joined Mar 2005
#18 ·
Such a fantastic movie. I have to agree, this is easily Leonardo DiCaprio's best performance to date, and Djimon Hounsou is absolutely stellar as well. It runs a little long and the pacing feels slightly uneven at times, but it’s definitely a must-see! From here on out, I'm done buying diamonds—I'm switching my focus to gold. 😬
Walter Fowler53 Walter Fowler53 Active Member
56 messages
joined Jul 2006
#19 ·
The movie didn't really hit me... I mean, it wasn't bad, just nothing special. Honestly, I thought Leonardo DiCaprio was better in The Departed than in this.
Elizabeth Ruiz65 Elizabeth Ruiz65 Active Member
66 messages
joined Jan 2008
#20 ·
Hands down the best thing I've watched lately. It’s packed with subtle
political undertones that work because they avoid the trap of being overly
heavy-handed—something you see all too often when a director tries to make a point.
Those final 20 minutes actually moved me, which isn't something many films manage to do.

I’d highly recommend this to anyone who looks for more than just mindless popcorn flicks
(though it’s certainly entertaining enough for those) where the story ends just as the credits roll.
Instead, this is for people who want a film that leaves them with plenty to chew on
—in this case, specifically regarding the awakening of awareness toward parts of the world
that are perhaps far too overlooked here in the West.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads