Can Dubia (now ModestyB)

Well, he claims:

Casey Bennett said:and proving who is right can be done in a civilized tone. Unless, of course, you are Jerry Robinson56.

then it must be either not civilized 🤔.. I am torn on this with you. I shall choose to be uncivilized. I have always had a penchant for impossible missions.

The last time, the moderator frogger was slapped with a red card for having a civilized discussion over in the banned corner—rather unusual, wouldn't you say?
And you recall the topic... that deceitful, corrupt physicist from MIT. Time has eventually revealed who held the truth.

Do you have an actual example, or are you simply presenting yourself as a paragon of virtue?
In point of fact, not so long ago, someone played quite obsessively with your supposed "morals"
using rather disgusting images and messages.

A long time ago, there was an old saying about "talking":Soldiers talk about cutting corners, while... others talk about honesty.>
Show some integrity instead of merely "talking," if I may suggest.

I would prefer we settle this once and for all; perhaps you could post the foundation upon which you base your rhetoric, or is this just another blatant display of your ambition to secure a better position within this habitat?

So then, could any of my uncivilized melodies be entirely unprovoked? Or better yet, where am I mistaken? Those who do not know that they do not know are the true obstacles to any sort of prosperity. 🙂
Exposing a moderator's lack of civility is penalized!>

And why? ...there are always smarter people around, aren't there? There is no shame in ignorance, but there is certainly shame in denying the truth because one does not know it.

You ought to understand that what is written depends heavily on your actual mental state, not just your momentary mood. Psychiatrists almost routinely become patients themselves... if it helps to comfort you.
Look at this situation from both sides... I understand where you are coming from.

And yes, if someone is jumping down your throat, it is you... (you will receive a "scolding" if you insist, and even the junior moderator can vouch for me).
I do not consider you uncivilized; you are simply who you are. Besides, you are far too young to be of any real interest to me. With age comes wisdom.

Handshake... I accept your answer that it cannot ....

I am exclusively tolerant, but when moderators fail to perform their duties, it becomes a matter of national defense and social self-preservation.
After all, that is just how we Americans are. bluecyclist64 is much the same.
Nothing personal... knowledge and common sense are the starting points for any culture. Even hybrid ones. When they vanish or are disparaged, everything dies.

😘

(I didn't press the magic little button)

Our correspondence does, however, yield some lovely things.

Thanks for the kind words, and I’m standing right there with you!
I want to highlight this specific part:

I consider myself an exclusively tolerant person, but when the moderators fail to perform their basic duties, stepping up becomes a matter of civic defense and social self-preservation.

Not long ago, I was slapped with an undeserved ban just because some incompetent mod decided to throw a tantrum. I didn't receive a single public explanation—just a private message essentially saying, "Look, we've let you slide on warnings plenty of times, so now you owe us; just deal with it because frankly, we don't give a damn about moderation rules as long as someone is sitting in the chair." That was the takeaway.
The issue isn't just about a single penalty; it’s the pattern. Every time someone points out poor moderation, they are met with total silence or the most unconvincing excuses imaginable. These moderators have turned into something akin to Amon Göth: they shoot at whoever they please, completely indifferent to the fallout, knowing we're too unarmed to do anything but take it.

That is why I fully support you, my friend, even though it's highly unlikely you'll ever get straight answers to your questions!👍

Always bluecyclist64 😉

The Democrats and the DNC 😉

We all know they won't show up; they can't find him, and frankly, they wouldn't bother looking if they could. You handle the social education side of things, while I manage the technicalities. And you already understand why there's silence on your end—someone eventually has to take responsibility and bow their head.

This forum is well-known enough to attract people who actually possess the ability to read and think critically, and that is really all that matters.

I hope you've listened to that song by that name (though I'm certain it's already on your radar); what truly matters is what remains invisible to the eye... click on quote

so we can wrap this up with a smile, concluding that if she were any smarter, she might actually be able to "handle us.".

To put it bluntly: it’s just a mess.
Get a room. One filled with pink toddler stockings. 😛

Jerry Robinson56, strangely enough, you're actually being decent to me. You're incoherent as usual, but decent—at least based on this half-glanced reading of your text.

If I valued my own life and especially my time any more than I do, and if I actually sat down to pore over every single one of your endless manifestos, who knows what I might find.
I'll leave things exactly as they are in my mind: I skim through your posts and I don't see any "lack of intelligence" or similar insults from your interactions with others on this forum, so I'll stick to my conviction that somewhere deep down, unconsciously... I won't say we love you, but we do sympathize. 🤷

Anyway, I stumbled upon a certain youthful energy in the text above (thanks, thanks 🙂) that apparently doesn't appeal to you (oh no, what will I do? what ever shall I do??). But otherwise... you're fine.

Generally speaking, your lack of basic manners when dealing with people is often glaringly obvious in your writing, not to mention your total disregard for netiquette. (Yes, that's a real thing, and you've already violated it in the title of this massive rant above.)

And I won't even bother pointing out your own examples of being offensive, because you stubbornly refuse to see your own insults—you've been doing it for years now. Wherever you create a total swamp, you seem to think it's a fragrant flowerbed meant to showcase your intellect and wisdom. Think what you want.

Don't bother tilting at windmills with me.

I am in quite a rush, but regarding your point...

The issue lies in the metrics you are applying, though it seems you still haven't grasped the core concept.
Why bother being "detailed" when you are already so certain of the inevitable?

Youth is tethered to something else entirely—something you are capable of, yet choose not to... regardless, my question was fundamentally simple.

And proving who is correct can actually be done with a sense of civility. Unless, of course, you are Jerry Robinson56, naturally..

Must I repeat myself?

Exploring the vast reaches of your exceptional potential is truly an invaluable exercise. 😉

Please provide an answer, unless you were simply being clumsy with your words...

Well, I already gave you my answer in my previous post.

I have absolutely no intention of pointing out your own insults to you, because you seem completely incapable of recognizing your own toxicity, and frankly, you haven't for years. In your mind, where you leave nothing but a total mess, you somehow see a pristine garden that serves as a testament to your intellect and wisdom. Think what you want.

So, tell me: how on earth does one prove they've been insulted by someone who is willfully blind to their own disrespect? How exactly am I supposed to do that?

Thank you for reaching out... that was quite kind of you, Casey Bennett, truly. However, you have once again misidentified the "brain police"... and you were actually the one who summoned them... weren't you? How am I supposed to perceive an entity while I am busy constructing it?
It is a curious phenomenon that intelligent individuals never seem to have an issue with me personally. (Though, admittedly, some eventually lose interest 😁.) That is your assertion once more, yet I merely posed a question.

an answer for you

You need to understand that what is written depends entirely on your actual cognitive standing, rather than your momentary state. Psychiatrists almost invariably become their own patients... if it provides you any comfort.
Look at this from both sides.... I understand you.

ponder what you have read

A mud pit is arguably more purposeful than the cesspool created by your partner-in-crime... do explain the concept of flux to him, so we might avoid induction, mutual induction, and self-induction,
while we wander through the forests on the moon, which are statistically more probable than his current level of knowledge.
You learned about measurement errors—everything from parallax error to systemic error.
Aside from pure data, all my posts deliver truth alongside a reflection not just of my opponent's ignorance, but of their sheer nonsense, all delivered in layman's terms.
In essence, it is a transformation of the existing insult that you cling to so desperately...
The truth does not bother me, even when it "kills" you (you know the distinction is significant)... it is a collective effort.
A mud pit is quite pleasant if you keep it properly warmed.

Naturally, there will be a reward for your wonderful discovery. Theoretical... practical... efficient... regardless of the fact that you were mistaken. You are dear to me, which is why I linger.

Man, seriously, just leave Modesty alone already.