Dealing with hate speech online

Peace has been a total fantasy since the mid-90s, back when we finally stood our ground against those aggressors; honestly, any talk of reconciliation or moving forward seems to serve nothing but their interests, and I truly believe this constant groveling toward them only highlights a weakness that they will inevitably exploit to punish us further.

And let’s be real about this whole summit situation—it feels like there is one singular objective here: the American leftists, specifically those radical elements within our own political landscape, would basically hand over the keys to the entire Midwest to the opposition just to satisfy their ideals, essentially letting them consolidate everything into one massive state while the rest of us get carved up.

The current administration's leadership is clearly shaped by those old ideological ties, and if you look closely, you can see that influence bleeding through every single policy move they make.

This post was somehow "rewarded" with a 500-point penalty because of alleged "hate speech."
Could one of the administrators please enlighten me as to which specific part of my statement qualifies as hate speech?
Thanks.

If someone starts citing ethnic background as the reason why a person is bad at their job, then that is incredibly grating to me. If they go even further by manipulating labels—like calling one parent an "ideological relic" when they are actually just a standard American, while labeling the other parent solely by an ethnic identifier to imply a certain political leaning—then I believe we are looking at a very sophisticated form of hate speech. It seems to me that this kind of rhetoric might actually be more insidious and damaging than someone using crude profanity or, if I recall our recent debate about that protest sign in San Francisco, even more toxic than that specific banner or anything similar to it.