Robin Nguyen said:Go listen to a full five-piece band playing live instruments instead of some duo or trio hiding behind drum machines and backing tracks, and you might actually understand why they didn't impress you... and don't let the random people on these forums tell you what to think about certain bands. Most of what I read here is just... well, I won't finish that sentence. Once you look at who is posting and why, everything becomes obvious. 🙂
Besides, you're the one paying the bills, not them!🙂
I'm not going to get into the quality of specific acts, but we need to build on this point: a band (minimum five members including drums and bass) is one thing, but anything else—a duo, a trio—is something else entirely... and when I say duo or trio, I'm being generous. By "group," I'm also including those four or five-person outfits—won't name names—that just have two keyboards, a female vocalist, and a guitarist...
The bottom line is: don't just count heads, make sure it's actually a band... because more people means more gear, more rehearsal time, and more logistics. Realistically, a real band should cost at least 50% more than a duo or trio...
It’s the same story with the weddings I work—the DJ side of things... I've been a guest at countless weddings where I was promised a full vocal group, only to be disappointed when two or three guys show up in matching suits and start playing...
I don't have an issue with the music itself, but I do have an issue when people pay for something they aren't actually getting...
Basically, a duo doesn't qualify as a band, and a duo or trio doesn't qualify as a vocal group—not by name, and certainly not by price.