Everything you need to know about Klonko

How could I possibly stay silent on this topic;

referring back to Klonkin's post;

I’m asking Klonka here—how exactly is that claim being backed up by facts?

Usually, when one of us puts something out there, people demand receipts—links, evidence, you know the drill—so I think it’s only fair we hold the mods to that same standard too...

And if we aren't going to be all pedantic about "facts," then let's look at this—we actually have the most recent court ruling regarding the aforementioned point. And it states:

"homosexuality is not described as a perversion, but rather it is noted that homosexual acts are disordered, contrary to natural law, and under no circumstances can they be approved; they do not choose their sexual state—for most, it represents a temptation, which is why they should be accepted with respect, compassion, and consideration, while avoiding any sign of unjust discrimination towards them".

http://www.nytimes.com/news...5/Default.aspx

Can we really accept this ruling from the Supreme Court of the United States as an established fact?

If so, then maybe it's time to clear Page's penalty points...

I’m sure you understand there’s a massive gap between modern medical views and religious doctrine. Looking at this ruling, that teacher just isn't being consistent with her own faith's teachings. Even if she didn't explicitly use the word "perversion," she really should have called it a severe perversion, which is exactly what her church teaches. If I were the parent of those kids, I’d definitely be questioning whether my children are actually learning the values I want them to hold regarding homosexuality.

Good grief...
I would appreciate it if you could refrain from starting such senseless threads in the future.
The article linked here simply states that a teacher is permitted to present views that align with Church doctrine during religious studies classes.
Thank you, and good day.