CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › GMOs

GMOs

Started by Kenneth Price8 · · 👁 4 views · 15 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Kenneth Price8Jonathan Lewis40Megan Morales5silvermason16shadowgardener12nimbledriver81Joseph Lee3Kyle Nelson2Frank Alvarez8
Kenneth Price8 Kenneth Price8 NewcomerOP
6 messages
joined Jan 2005
#1 ·
So, bottom line... would you actually eat GMO stuff? Like, plants or meat that's been messed with in a lab? Would you even pick up something with those labels at the grocery store? Just wondering where everyone stands on this mess...
Jonathan Lewis40 Jonathan Lewis40 Newcomer
5 messages
joined May 2005
#2 ·
Honestly, I’d eat it. I’d much rather have something with GMOs than some crop that’s been absolutely drenched in pesticides. Think about it—if you can engineer a plant to be naturally resistant to pests through its own genetics, isn't that actually healthier than spraying it with toxins just to keep bugs away? Mutations happen all the time in nature anyway; it’s just part of the deal. At the end of the day, we just need to test GMO products with the same rigor we use for everything else in our food supply—you know, those dyes, artificial flavors, and additives you see everywhere. If the testing proves it's safe, then let people buy it. The only thing we should strictly forbid is letting stuff hit the shelves if it hasn't passed those tests or if it's clearly harmful.
Megan Morales5 Megan Morales5 Active Member
86 messages
joined Dec 2004
#3 ·
Grace Flores85 said:Basically, would you eat genetically modified food—both plants and animals? Would you actually buy products labeled that way? What’s your general take on the whole thing?

Why phrase it as a hypothetical? We’re already buying and eating it—sometimes we know, sometimes we don't... If I actually had a choice, sure, I'd steer clear of it. But choices aren't always on the table, are they? It makes you wonder how much control we'll even have left in the future...
silvermason16 silvermason16 Member
37 messages
joined Aug 2004
#4 ·
Between a product packed with GMO soy versus one made with
organic soy, I’m obviously going with the latter.

I assume that "organic" label actually stands for something...
shadowgardener12 shadowgardener12 Active Member
186 messages
joined Dec 2002
#5 ·
No GMOs, no pesticides, nothing industrial... I stick to organic. That's just my way.

I like good food. Real food. High nutrient density... the fresher, the better.

If I'm not in a massive rush, I always check the labels first. Looking for preservatives or emulsifiers... if I can find one without all that extra junk, that's what I'm grabbing. Same goes for things like Mozzarella, Gouda, or any other cheese. Salmon too... just want the clean stuff.
Salami, hot dogs, canned meat... all that junk? Yeah, I cut it out of my diet a long time ago...

Vegetables can be loaded with pesticides... though organic options exist. Problem is, you can't always trust that they actually follow the labeling standards. There are specialty grocery stores dedicated to organic food, too...
nimbledriver81 nimbledriver81 Active Member
96 messages
joined Aug 2007
#6 ·
I find myself standing firmly against GMO foods—purely from an ethical standpoint, really. Now, if I were looking at this through a strictly professional lens, I could see how GMO technology might actually be useful, but my gut tells me there's a darker side to it. I just can't shake the fear that massive multinational corporations are going to exploit all that scientific progress for their own gain. It feels like a lopsided deal where they say, "Sure, we'll give you sterile seeds and overpriced pesticides, as long as you hand over all your profits to us."
I'm not entirely sure I can avoid them altogether in today's world, but I certainly try my best to steer clear.
Joseph Lee3 Joseph Lee3 Active Member
113 messages
joined May 2005
#7 ·
Matthew Sullivan32 said:Why even use the conditional tense here? It’s not like we aren't already buying and eating this stuff—sometimes we know exactly what's in it, and sometimes we're just blissfully unaware.

I'm right there with you.🙂
Kenneth Price8 Kenneth Price8 NewcomerOP
6 messages
joined Jan 2005
#8 ·
Don't tell me it's risky, like planting GM soy just to have those herbicide-resistant genes jump to weeds... turning them into superweeds and resetting the whole damn cycle...
shadowgardener12 shadowgardener12 Active Member
186 messages
joined Dec 2002
#9 ·
then you've got these superweeds growing as big as baobabs, just swallowing up nearby towns

life's a dangerous business 😉 😁
Megan Morales5 Megan Morales5 Active Member
86 messages
joined Dec 2004
#10 ·
nimbledriver81 said:I’m against GMO foods—purely on ethical grounds. Looking at it from a professional standpoint, GMO tech can be useful, I get that—but I’m terrified of how these massive corporations abuse their expertise. It's basically a rigged game: "You give us all the profit, and in exchange, we'll give you sterile seeds and overpriced pesticides."
I don't know if I can always avoid it, but I try...

The real kicker is when you plant those manipulated seeds—the ones they hand out for free during the first year—and then suddenly the next batch is obscenely expensive. Once you've planted that stuff, traditional seeds won't perform nearly as well—I've seen studies backing that up—so what's left? Farmers are stuck buying those pricey seeds over and over again. They become completely dependent because they can't produce them themselves. It's just modern-day slavery, American style...
Kyle Nelson2 Kyle Nelson2 Regular
475 messages
joined Jun 2008
#11 ·
We really need to nail down some definitions here:

1. Terminator technology—this refers to seeds that can’t be replanted the following year, forcing you to buy more every single season. I honestly think there should be a law requiring companies to sell both types, so people actually have a choice.

2. GMOs that are actually fine, since we've been crossbreeding different species for ages. That’s basically why we even have high-yield wheat today with all those extra grains per stalk.

3. Transgenic food, which is when they take a fish gene and shove it into a tomato just so it won't freeze... that part creeps me out. It's because you're dealing with viruses that can grab genes from their hosts. Since viruses (as far as I know) are split into plant and animal categories, by putting an animal gene into a plant, you're expanding a closed set of mathematical probabilities for new virus strains. One day, we might end up with refrigerators that are completely useless because mold starts thriving in the cold.

Bottom line? As long as we're stuck with folks like Hebrang who have the power to ban products containing GMOs, we don't stand a chance... We'll just have to stick to the local farmers' markets and buy from the Majority of maidens, because at least we know they're just picking stuff straight from the dirt.
Megan Morales5 Megan Morales5 Active Member
86 messages
joined Dec 2004
#12 ·
you can only trust the local farmers' markets—and even then, only from those specific women we know are basically scavengers, picking up whatever they plan to sell us from the dirt...

The Majority of maidens at those weekend markets aren't some kind of quality guarantee either. It doesn't matter how friendly or wholesome they look—half of them are probably buying their stock at 5:00 AM from a wholesale distributor and then turning around to sell it to you at a premium with a shaky hand... 😉
nimbledriver81 nimbledriver81 Active Member
96 messages
joined Aug 2007
#13 ·
Kyle Nelson2 said:3. GMO food—meaning you’ve basically stuffed fish genes into your tomatoes just so they don't freeze up during transport...

I’m on board with everything else being discussed here, but I absolutely have to jump in on this specific point. What you’re describing is nothing more than an urban legend. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS a tomato containing fish DNA. It’s truly unfortunate—this myth has been floating around for years, yet people just seem to tune out every single time a formal debunking comes along.

Matthew Sullivan32, I think we might actually be reading the same scientific studies! That’s exactly why I argued that big corporations are essentially weaponizing science—they aren't using their breakthroughs to end world hunger; they're just using them to squeeze profit out of people who are struggling to make ends meet.
Frank Alvarez8 Frank Alvarez8 Member
43 messages
joined Jun 2005
#14 ·
Matthew Sullivan32 said:The Majority of maidens at the farmers market aren't a guarantee of quality either. No matter how friendly they seem, half of them are just picking up produce at a wholesale warehouse at 5 AM and then selling it to you at a markup with shaky hands.😉

A lot of those ladies claim to grow "healthy, pesticide-free veggies" right next to the interstate. I once had some carrots and lettuce tested 😱 when they were grown just 500 meters from the highway—specifically near the I-95 corridor.
Kyle Nelson2 Kyle Nelson2 Regular
475 messages
joined Jun 2008
#15 ·
nimbledriver81 said:I agree with everything else being said, but I have to jump in on this one. This thing you’re bringing up? It’s an urban legend. There is NO SUCH THING AS tomatoes with fish DNA. Honestly, this myth has been floating around for years, and people just flat-out ignore the fact that it's been debunked.

Matthew Sullivan32, I think we read the same studies, because I'm pretty sure about this. That's why I mentioned how corporations exploit science—they aren't using it to feed hungry people; they're just using it to profit off their desperation.

Maybe, I'm definitely no expert on this stuff...
but that whole perspective and division was actually pointed out to me by a major genetics expert who's part of the National Academy of Sciences.
Megan Morales5 Megan Morales5 Active Member
86 messages
joined Dec 2004
#16 ·
magriz said:It feels like every small-town farmer out there is peddling "organic, pesticide-free goodness" right next to the interstate. I actually went through the trouble of getting a lead analysis done on some carrots and lettuce I bought once 😱—and this was from a stand just a few hundred yards off the I-95

Spot on.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads