Leggings lovers: Let's talk!

Hey Silverwolf88, get over here so we can shoot the breeze about those damn taxes. I can't tell if they're targeting us specifically or just everyone else!

let's dance 🎉🎉

The five phases of leggings 🎉 🎉

Maria Wright62 said:the five levels of leggings 🎉 🎉

lol 😬

Can I wear Little Orphan Annie? 👋

Harold Adams19 said:lol 😬

It’s perfect. 😁 🎉

Chloe Cooper10 said:Can I wear Little Orphan Annie? 👋

what even is Little Orphan Annie? 🤔

just buy some leggings and get over here

Harold Adams19 said:So, what exactly is Little Orphan Annie? 🤔

Buy some panties first, then come back talking.

Little Orphan Annie is just a pair of panties with polka dots. 😳
Then she went ahead and cut the dots off. 😳

@Maria Wright62🙂

Chloe Cooper10 said:Little Orphan Annie is just some girl wearing oversized bloomers. 😳
Then she goes and cuts them off. 😳

@Maria Wright62🙂

And what exactly are bloomers? 😁

@Mijice, where'd you go? Why the sudden disappearance? 😳

Chloe Cooper10 said:Little Orphan Annie is just some girl wearing Smurfs. 😳
Then she goes and cuts them up. 😳

@Maria Wright62🙂

you really didn't explain much 🕺 what a Smurf actually is? 🕺

Maria Wright62 said:And what exactly are "Smurfs"? 😁

@Mijice, where did you disappear to? You're ghosting us. 😳

Harold Adams19 said:You've said quite a bit already. 🕺So, what is a Smurf? 🕺

They mean Little Orphan Annie. 🙂
As for Smurfs—use some logic. If they were evolving from Little Orphan Annie, they'd just be leggings. 🐔

@Maria Wright62/">@@Maria Wright62, I deal in fragrances. 😳

Chloe Cooper10 said:

Those are Little Orphan Annie shorts. 🙂
And if you can't figure out how Smurfs end up being nothing more than tight leggings instead of those little shorts, you just don't get it. 🐔

@Maria Wright62/">@@Maria Wright62, I work in the fragrance industry. 😳

Then why didn't you just call them tights? 😬

@ Mia Khalifa, even Google can't help me find info on those ankle socks. If you cut them, do they just turn into tights? 🤔

So, how's business? Any orders coming in? 😁

Harold Adams19 said:Man, Silvio, get over here so we can talk shop about leggings. Whether they're targeting us or someone else, it's all the same!

dance away 🎉🎉

I actually got slapped with a three-month ban because of leggings

Thanks for starting this thread

And thanks to everyone out there fighting against the discrimination of legging enthusiasts

https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/...meggings-trend

silverwolf88, the council isn't exactly thrilled about your little appearances on this forum ☕

William Grant20 said:silverwolf88, the council isn't exactly thrilled about you showing up on this forum ☕

What council? Are we talking about the Federal Communications Commission being offended by my presence here?
What actual, legitimate reason does this "council" have for deciding I shouldn't be allowed on the forum?

silverwolf88 said:Which council are we even talking about? Are you implying some sort of Federal Communications Commission oversight body is offended by my presence here? What possible legitimate grounds could this supposed council have to claim I shouldn't be allowed on this forum?

The truth is, we don't want you here because of your relentless charade regarding your status as an astrologer; you haven't even met the basic credentials required to work at a professional observatory. To make matters worse, even your mathematical proofs are completely fallacious—we actually took the time to verify them with ☕

William Grant20 said:We don't want you hanging around this forum anymore—not with all the constant lying about being an astrologer when you haven't even met the basic qualifications to work at NASA. To make matters worse, we actually double-checked your math—it's completely wrong. ☕

I wasn't lying—I present myself as an alternative astrologer who developed my own situational astrological theory to correct classical astrology, which mainstream scientists dismiss as mere pseudoscience. Look, let's be real—the academic establishment doesn't recognize astrology degrees as legitimate science, and frankly, those theories aren't backed by a single shred of scientific evidence.
Maybe we should just go straight to the scientists and ask them why the media keeps trying to censor me over an astrology degree—especially since "official" science doesn't recognize astrology, let alone any degrees associated with it. Is it that the American media is suddenly at war with actual science?

Look, you can't possibly determine the accuracy percentage of my astrological theory without putting it to the test in a real-world setting. It’s basic logic—you haven't verified the data through practical application. So, why is there such a blatant refusal to actually test my theory? Here’s my proposal: put my theory into practice. If I fail to pass your little "exam," then go ahead—permanently ban me from this forum. Simple as that.
That being said—it turns out some people actually found my astrology theory interesting [link]


Look, let's get one thing straight—I don't follow traditional astrology. That’s exactly why I market myself as an alternative astrologer. Astrology itself is considered an alternative practice, which makes me a practitioner of the "alternative to the alternative"—an concept that, frankly, might be a bit too much high-level math for some of you to wrap your heads around. If my situational astrological theories prove accurate in practice, it shouldn't be such a monumental task for other astrologers to actually learn from them. I’ve put in the work to develop these corrections specifically because mainstream scientists refuse to validate the expertise of anyone holding an astrology degree. So, here is my question: if the scientific community doesn't recognize classical astrology anyway, why does the media suddenly have such a problem with people trying to refine it? Why are you all acting like you're defying science when the scientists themselves don't even buy into it?

So, why exactly are you refusing to statistically validate the accuracy rate of my situational astrological theory? Seriously—what’s the hold-up? And while we're at it, why is intellectual property treated like a joke here in America? It's frustrating, frankly—original work barely gets any respect around here.

Regarding my research paper on mathematical corrections for kinetic energy—I’m currently wrapping that up. Once it hits the peer review stage, I'll let you guys know if it actually makes the cut or gets rejected.

Even if one of you journalists holds a degree in math or physics, I haven't actually presented my derivations to you—nor have I published them publicly anywhere—so you're in no position to judge something you haven't seen or verified. What I posted on this forum was merely a minimal presentation comparing different calculation methods; it was intended as a way to pique the interest of actual scientists so they might finally take a look at my mathematical proofs. To be clear, I wasn't posting my full derivations here—I was providing comparative numerical presentations of various mathematical expressions. There is a massive difference between presenting a mathematical expression and actually writing out a derivation with an explanation of how you arrived at that expression.

If my review doesn't clear the hurdle—then I guess we’re playing by your rules—I won't be allowed to post on this forum anymore. Period.

Look, if my mathematical proofs actually pass peer review, are you guys going to issue a public apology?

If my review actually clears peer review—which probably won't happen in some third-rate academic wasteland like this—then I’m going straight to Garofeeders. I’ll be demanding a public apology in the media for every single way they mistreated me.

Just dropping in to show some support for the marginalized minority and silverwolf88's fight for visibility, while highlighting the struggles they face. 👍

rowdytiger13 said:I just wanted to jump in here and show some solidarity for this marginalized minority and support silverwolf88 in their fight for visibility, especially when pointing out all the systemic issues they're dealing with... 👍

#1stWorldProblems

silverwolf88 said:
I wasn't lying when I identified myself as an alternative astrologer; I’ve developed my own situational astrological theory specifically to patch the holes in classical astrology—which, let’s be honest, mainstream scientists dismiss as pure pseudoscience . Consequently, since official science doesn't recognize astrology degrees, those credentials hold no scientific weight
. So, if mainstream science doesn't acknowledge astrology or its diplomas, why then are the media outlets trying to censor me over an astrology degree? Are American media organizations somehow fundamentally opposed to official science?

Furthermore, you have absolutely no way of knowing the accuracy rate of my astrological theory unless you actually test it through practical application. So, why is there such a blatant refusal to put my theory to the test? Why not just verify my situational astrological theory in practice? Go ahead, test it out; if I fail your little exam, then feel free to permanently ban me from this forum
. That said, certain individuals actually found my astrological theory quite satisfactory


The reality is that I don't follow classical astrology, which is precisely why I present myself as an alternative astrologer. Since astrology itself falls under the umbrella of "alternative," I am essentially dealing with the alternative of the alternative—and I sincerely hope that isn't some sort of advanced calculus that escapes your comprehension. If my situational astrological theory proves itself accurate in practice, it shouldn't be an insurmountable task for other astrologers to learn it. I went through the trouble of crafting these astrological corrections specifically because scientists refuse to respect the expertise held by certified astrologers. So, if scientists won't accept classical astrology, why does it bother so many media outlets to see someone attempting to correct it? Why are you all defying the scientists?

But really, what is the reason for refusing to statistically validate the accuracy percentage of my situational astrological theory through practical testing? Why is intellectual property and original work valued so lowly here in America?

As for my work regarding mathematical corrections for kinetic energy, I am still finalizing that paper; once it undergoes peer review, I can let you know whether it passed or failed
.
Even if some of you journalists happen to hold degrees in mathematics or physics, I haven't presented my actual derivations to you, nor have I published them publicly. Therefore, you cannot judge what you haven't seen or verified. What I posted on this forum was merely a minimal presentation of comparative calculations using different methods, intended solely to pique the interest of scientists so they might actually review my mathematical derivations. To be clear, I didn't post my full mathematical derivations on this forum; I provided comparative numerical presentations of various mathematical expressions. There is a massive difference between presenting a mathematical expression and writing out a complete mathematical derivation with an explanation of how one arrived at that expression
.
If my paper fails the review process, then I will concede to your argument that I have no business posting on this forum
.
However, if my mathematical derivations pass the review, will you all be issuing a public apology?

Especially if the review passes (though likely not in a scientifically underdeveloped nation like this), I will demand that Garofeeder issue a public apology in the media for the way I've been treated .

Your review isn't going to pass, because the owners of the local coffee shops in Santa Barbara have already reviewed your mathematical derivations and informed us that everything is completely wrong ☕