CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Mid-length feature films

Mid-length feature films

Started by lonelynx16 · · 👁 5 views · 1 reply

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants lonelynx16northerncrane4
lonelynx16 lonelynx16 MemberOP
29 messages
joined Mar 2007
#1 ·
I’ve been digging through film theory books and articles, but I honestly can't find any solid definition for this specific category or what actually defines its characteristics. In my mind, a medium-length film would fall somewhere in that 45 to 60-minute sweet spot. I’m really curious to know if anyone can point me toward some quintessential examples—you know, the standout works and directors that define the genre—and if anyone has links where I can actually watch them. I’d love to get a real conversation going about where medium-length films sit compared to standard shorts...

For instance, if you ask me, A Star Is Born (1987) by Todd Haynes would probably fit right into that mid-length, experimental niche. Let's use that movie as a jumping-off point for the discussion, assuming anyone here has actually sat through it... (here's the link: watch the film)
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#2 ·
lonelynx16 said:Personally, I’d define a medium-length feature as anything landing between 45 and 60 minutes.

Somewhere between 30 and 70.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads