CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Moderating on Apple - Chuck

Moderating on Apple - Chuck

Started by rustywalker42 · · 👁 3 views · 5 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants rustywalker42Charles Fox10
rustywalker42 rustywalker42 Active MemberOP
244 messages
joined Oct 2012
#1 ·
So, I report these two posts—which are blatant violations of the subforum rules three times over—and what happens? No warning, no nothing:

The guy literally just copy-pastes an entire article without adding a single comment. That's strictly forbidden.

And then he actually has the nerve to say, and I quote, "I'm just messing around":

And still? Not a single strike.

Meanwhile, I get flagged for trolling in this post:

It’s funny how moderator Charles Fox10 isn't religious, and wouldn't you know it, he decides to penalize me for my anti-church views while letting someone who clearly breaks the subforum rules walk free.

Is that what we call objective moderation now?

And where exactly was the trolling in my post?
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#2 ·
Look at him, acting like he can judge my faith. Maybe I should just confess everything to you instead.

Your record includes several posts where you act superior and rely on a pile of Ad Hominem attacks regarding this
Did the Bishop appoint a representative? No. So stop trolling; you're being exhausting and your argument makes zero sense.

Regarding these reports, one post was moderated while the other wasn't, and won't be.

And looking back at all the reports, you actually got off easy.
rustywalker42 rustywalker42 Active MemberOP
244 messages
joined Oct 2012
#3 ·
Charles Fox10 said:Oh, wow, look at him go, deciding whether I'm a believer or not. Maybe I should just come over and confess my sins to you next.

And you've handed out bans in several other posts where you act all high and mighty, throwing a pile of Ad Hominem attacks around for this.

Regarding those reported posts: one got moderated, the other didn't, and won't be.

And looking back at all the reports, you really played it fair.

You don't need to tell me anything; I've been on this forum long enough to know exactly what you stand for.

Why wasn't it moderated? Is it actually okay to just copy an entire article without adding a single comment? Isn't that a violation of the subforum rules—a 30-point ban territory?

Reports against me? Just take a look at how people are treating me in that thread.

Why did you delete his message? Why didn't you ban him?

And why hasn't this been banned?

It's literally just an article copied from CNN and a link slapped underneath. So yeah, it's a direct violation of the subforum rules.

• Article 4.
In the Apple subforum, the following is prohibited:
• Posting copied texts exceeding 1,000 characters.


That guy's post is 6,234 characters long.
rustywalker42 rustywalker42 Active MemberOP
244 messages
joined Oct 2012
#4 ·
Can I get an answer from someone else? Since Charles Fox10 refuses to address a blatant violation of the subforum rules.
rustywalker42 rustywalker42 Active MemberOP
244 messages
joined Oct 2012
#5 ·
Itko?

Looks like some forum manchild is getting special treatment from the admins and mods, since they’re clearly ignoring rule violations in this subforum.
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#6 ·
The colleague you're referring to has been banned.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads