CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Mods - question regarding banning

Mods - question regarding banning

Started by rowdytrucker12 · · 👁 3 views · 5 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants rowdytrucker12Charles Fox10hollowcanyon15lonebadger6
rowdytrucker12 rowdytrucker12 NewcomerOP
1 message
joined Feb 2019
#1 ·
Will this comment get me banned:

Then you clearly lack a fundamental understanding of our current cultural and civilizational landscape.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#2 ·
It’s not happening.

Regarding that card you were complaining about on Reddit, my colleague already explained the reasoning to you. I have nothing more to add, and they aren't being rescinded.

Besides, there's no need to play the hero and defend her. She can hold her own just fine when it counts.
rowdytrucker12 rowdytrucker12 NewcomerOP
1 message
joined Feb 2019
#3 ·
Charles Fox10 said:It isn't getting through.

Thanks.

Charles Fox10 said:Regarding the ban you complained about on Reddit, those reasons were already explained to you by my colleague. I have nothing further to add, and the decision will not be reversed.

By the way, there is absolutely no need for any colleague to play the musketeer and attempt to defend her; she is more than capable of holding her own whenever the situation demands it.

I see no reason to waste my breath commenting on this colleague anymore. One only needs to glance at the sheer volume of threads on Reddit or the news outlets that feature his name in the headlines to understand the situation.
hollowcanyon15 hollowcanyon15 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Feb 2023
#4 ·
I just got flagged for trolling in a thread about the Convention on Violence Against Women for this specific post:

Quote:
Since the official statements are so vague—using loaded terms like "snake whisperers" or "false prophets," which basically lets anyone project whatever bias they want onto the situation—I actually appreciated seeing such a blunt, transparent breakdown of what the UN treaty aims to achieve and the potential dystopia we face if it gets ratified. 😬

"This is a heavy issue. If we follow this path, decisions regarding whether women can serve as priests won't be made by the Pope anymore, but by this 'Convention.' I'm not saying this to scare people. This is simply the reality; if the Convention passes, these will be the long-term consequences."

Under those circumstances, we might see a female "Pope" leading The World Capital. Perhaps that's part of the larger scheme to dismantle the Church as an institution. American politicians seem pretty clueless about it, or maybe they’re just echoing whatever is being shouted at them from Brussels.
https://kamenjar.com/fra-mario-knezo...upi-svecenici/

I'm curious: if I hadn't included my initial sarcastic remark, would sharing a link that interprets the fallout of the Convention—which is clearly being circulated in certain religious circles to drum up opposition—still be labeled as trolling?
Thanks.
lonebadger6 lonebadger6 Active Member
165 messages
joined Oct 2018
#5 ·
Maybe it would stay, maybe it wouldn't, but honestly, it’d probably just get nuked anyway since we only allow that kind of "conspiracy theory" nonsense over on the Edge of Science subreddit...
hollowcanyon15 hollowcanyon15 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Feb 2023
#6 ·
I’ll admit, I don’t claim to fully grasp the mechanics of it all—I’m not out here spinning my own conspiracy theories from scratch—I just tend to point out where they already exist. But fine... I won't go looking for another headache.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads