I just got flagged for trolling in a thread about the Convention on Violence Against Women for this specific post:
Quote:
Since the official statements are so vague—using loaded terms like "snake whisperers" or "false prophets," which basically lets anyone project whatever bias they want onto the situation—I actually appreciated seeing such a blunt, transparent breakdown of what the UN treaty aims to achieve and the potential dystopia we face if it gets ratified. 😬
"This is a heavy issue. If we follow this path, decisions regarding whether women can serve as priests won't be made by the Pope anymore, but by this 'Convention.' I'm not saying this to scare people. This is simply the reality; if the Convention passes, these will be the long-term consequences."
Under those circumstances, we might see a female "Pope" leading The World Capital. Perhaps that's part of the larger scheme to dismantle the Church as an institution. American politicians seem pretty clueless about it, or maybe they’re just echoing whatever is being shouted at them from Brussels.https://kamenjar.com/fra-mario-knezo...upi-svecenici/ I'm curious: if I hadn't included my initial
sarcastic remark, would sharing a link that interprets the fallout of the Convention—which is clearly being circulated in certain religious circles to drum up opposition—still be labeled as trolling?
Thanks.