CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Politics

Politics

Started by Rachel Cooper3 · · 👁 2 views · 9 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Rachel Cooper3Charles Fox10rustydrifter10lonebadger6
Rachel Cooper3 Rachel Cooper3 Active MemberOP
167 messages
joined May 2014
#1 ·
Nick, at least send some kind of signal so I know where we stand.

I’m posting here since rustydrifter10 isn't saying anything.

I am requesting the removal of those specific political sections I requested myself—if that is even possible.

Best,
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#2 ·
Probably not, though we haven't reached an agreement just yet.
Rachel Cooper3 Rachel Cooper3 Active MemberOP
167 messages
joined May 2014
#3 ·
Why would I? I didn't wait for the mods to hand it to me—I went out and got it myself.
Whatever.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#4 ·
When you submit a request for a partial, the exact same set of rules applies as if a moderator had assigned it directly via a formal decision.
Rachel Cooper3 Rachel Cooper3 Active MemberOP
167 messages
joined May 2014
#5 ·
That makes zero sense to me—but fine.
It’s all well and good if you all need to reach a consensus; I don't see why that would be an issue, considering I haven't been a troublemaker—which, by the way, is why the mods gave me partial credit. I've only got about five strikes on politics in total, none exceeding 35 points, and if I recall correctly, I've never even been banned.

Do whatever you have to do.
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#6 ·
You actually wrote this once before
Just so we're clear, you guys are hands down the worst mods on this entire forum.

Since nothing ever changes around here anyway, you won't be losing your status.
Rachel Cooper3 Rachel Cooper3 Active MemberOP
167 messages
joined May 2014
#7 ·
So, since you can't handle criticism, you refuse to issue a ban. If this were an actual insult, I might have a point—but as it stands? Fine. If you need to feed off this kind of behavior, good luck to you.

If this was such a massive issue—a "dealbreaker," as you put it—why didn't you just ban me yourselves? Not that I expect an answer; there’s clearly no logical explanation for it anyway.

I must admit, I am genuinely taken aback by the "reasoning" provided.
lonebadger6 lonebadger6 Active Member
165 messages
joined Oct 2018
#8 ·
Man, you could have actually given me some substance here 🙂 You should probably take a look at this, though; there’s a much more important post from a former moderator that makes it crystal clear that when someone requests a partial review, all the standard rules still apply just like they would for a full one:
Rachel Cooper3 Rachel Cooper3 Active MemberOP
167 messages
joined May 2014
#9 ·
I’m genuinely curious—what exactly is so controversial about this content?
Did I actually offend someone? What is the issue with holding a different opinion—does that somehow disqualify me from posting? I assume I would have been suspended or banned if there were an actual violation here.
Go ahead and moderate however you see fit; I have no problem with that. I just want to read without being logged out, and occasionally comment when a topic actually catches my interest.

People over there are racking up dozens of strikes while the resident trolls run the show, yet somehow, I am the problem.
Rachel Cooper3 Rachel Cooper3 Active MemberOP
167 messages
joined May 2014
#10 ·
I received a decent response.

Just send the key.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads