darkowl72
Regular
311 messages
joined Oct 2015
I used to run an HP, constantly feeding it Oracle ink from $2.75, and I was pretty happy until I clogged the nozzles myself—my own damn fault. Now I’ve switched to a Canon, but since I’m using a CISS setup, I don't really deal with individual ink bottles anymore. Honestly, it's all much of the same. If I had to nitpick, maybe the Canon feels a tiny bit more rugged and reliable, though I can't say it feels rock solid either. Probably just because it survived a messy CISS installation 😬. Print quality is basically a wash; I haven't noticed a real difference, except maybe the paper coming out of the HP felt a bit "wetter," but that might just be because that model was already three years old when I bought it.
With the HP, I loved having that built-in SD card reader. With the Canon, the Wi-Fi is nice to have, even if I never actually use it... 😬 Both machines make about the same amount of noise during scanning and printing...
Someone once tried telling me the Canon is better built because it's easier to tinker with if the nozzles clog, and that the nozzle design itself is superior. I don't really care, though. In my opinion, once this kind of gear dies, it’s not worth fixing unless you're some kind of hobbyist. It's usually cheaper to just buy a new one.
I won't say anything about IBM because I've never owned one, and based on what I've seen passing by, I can't give a real assessment.
I think you picked good models for the price point. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter which one you go with...