Question?

Why did I get banned from this forum without any actual explanation? (Tinder)? Also, I’m looking for some extra clarification from Alice regarding the ruling against Eugene C.. This isn't just about my personal feelings; let's run a poll on the forum to see how many people actually find his avatar offensive. If it’s less than a third of the community, then we have a problem, and I’m betting it’ll be even lower than that. Why does he absolutely have to broadcast his sexual orientation by hijacking Christian symbols? That is the crux of the entire issue. It’s nothing more than pure provocation and an insult to those who hold their faith dear. He could use a rainbow circle, a tree, a flower, the ocean, a bird... anything else. But you won't try to pull the wool over my eyes and pretend this isn't a blatant act of hate and provocation.

psI am still waiting for an explanation as to why I was banned!

quietrider3 said:This isn't just my personal opinion. Let's just run a poll on the forum to see how many people actually mind his avatar. If it's less than a third of the community, then we're good—and I’m pretty sure that’ll be the case.

Maybe we should hold a national referendum instead? And while we're at it, let's actually define "hate speech," because it seems like you're a bit lost when it comes to the terminology.

You've been banned for using two different accounts to post in the same threads. As for the avatar issue, Alice can clear that up for you.🙂

quietrider3 said:Why on earth did I get hit with the ban hammer on TikTok without even getting an explanation?

Look, I don't want to leave you hanging without an explanation, but you've been hit with a ban because you were caught running multiple profiles on the same threads. If you want to appeal the decision, you can file a formal grievance using your banned username via the PDF document found in the ban hammer section. Just a heads-up though—until that specific account is cleared, you aren't allowed to post here with this profile or any other one on the forum.

quietrider3 said:I’m actually looking for a bit more of an explanation from rustydrifter10 regarding that ruling involving Eugene C. dodatan.

No need for any extra explanation.