CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Red Lights (2012)

Red Lights (2012)

Started by swiftsurfer27 · · 👁 3 views · 8 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants swiftsurfer27goldenhound32silvertiger11brightcobra21Thomas Jones13Dennis Carter4boldeagle3Jose Ortiz2hollowsailor19
swiftsurfer27 swiftsurfer27 Active MemberOP
51 messages
joined Dec 2006
#1 ·
RED LIGHTS (2012)

The film follows Sigourney Weaver and Cillian Murphy as they investigate paranormal phenomena, specifically focusing on how these occurrences are staged to expose the tricks behind "supernatural" events. Meanwhile, Robert de Niro delivers a performance as a blind parapsychologist making a public comeback after thirty years in seclusion.

Trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzDOkA6O6rE

IMDB http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1748179/

Written and directed by: Rodrigo Cortes
Starring: Sigourney Weaver, Cillian Murphy, Robert de Niro, Elizabeth Olsen, Toby Jones

It serves as an interesting watch, even if the conclusion feels somewhat disorganized—though you might certainly pick up a few lessons on how easily people can be deceived. It makes me wonder, why aren't these kinds of artifacts studied in psychology departments across the country?😁
goldenhound32 goldenhound32 Regular
335 messages
joined Mar 2024
#2 ·
It’s all because our education system is fundamentally broken. From what I hear, aspiring psychologists here are being force-fed nothing but absolute garbage.

The film itself is solid, and I honestly don't see what the fuss is about. It featured a perfectly executed twist that caught me completely off guard.

And Robert de Niro is simply the king.
silvertiger11 silvertiger11 Active Member
106 messages
joined Jul 2016
#3 ·
It’s a solid movie, but honestly, it starts dragging toward the end.
brightcobra21 brightcobra21 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jan 2012
#4 ·
silvertiger11 said:It's a solid movie, but honestly, it starts dragging toward the end.

I'm totally with you on that!

The way they handled Sigourney's death felt a little rushed and superficial for my taste, but hey, since I've always had a huge soft spot for Robert De Niro, I still walked away feeling pretty good about the whole thing.
Thomas Jones13 Thomas Jones13 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jan 2013
#5 ·
Really enjoyed this one... kept me hooked from start to finish... and even though I kind of saw the ending coming, it still hit home... solid cast, too
Dennis Carter4 Dennis Carter4 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jan 2013
#6 ·
What a mess. It starts out promising enough, but then it just spirals completely out of control!
boldeagle3 boldeagle3 Active Member
128 messages
joined Jan 2004
#7 ·
A film that sets up such a potentially rich premise, only to end up being a complete non-event.
By the time the credits rolled, I honestly couldn't tell what had actually happened—not that I particularly cared to figure it out... it just left that kind of lingering, heavy impression on me... 😁

Cillian Murphy was excellent, Sigourney was alright, but Robert De Niro was just... meh.
Jose Ortiz2 Jose Ortiz2 Member
19 messages
joined Jul 2014
#8 ·
Just caught this movie on TV.

Solid concept, but yeah, it drags. It starts getting tedious right after Margaret dies.
The character played by Elizabeth Olsen felt totally unnecessary—even if she did eventually figure out the trick Robert De Niro’s character was using at the end.
That ending twist, "You can't deny yourself forever," was actually pretty sharp.
But honestly, they glossed over Margaret's death way too much. They mention she succumbed to an illness—showing some shots of her taking meds—but before that, Ty had this massive blowout fight with her and said some real nasty stuff. The actual death scene itself felt unfinished.

Overall though, it's a decent watch. 🙂

silvertiger11 said:Good movie, but it gets boring toward the end.

brightcobra21 said:I'm with you!

And I was a bit let down by how rushed Sigourney's death was, but since I have a soft spot for Robert De Niro, I'm still satisfied with the flick.
hollowsailor19 hollowsailor19 Active Member
54 messages
joined Aug 2007
#9 ·
Decent enough movie. A solid 6.8/10. Worth a watch if you have the time.

BUT, the writing really let the plot slide. It starts off strong, but then it just loses its way as it goes on.
It’s honestly such a waste of talent. Having Murphy, Weaver, and De Niro all in one cast? That should have been the definitive masterpiece of the 2010s.

That scene where they beat up Murphy was 🙏🙏. Just brutal, raw realism.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads