#1 ·
Just caught Farhad's 'Fireworks Wednesday'—it’s the precursor to his big hits like 'About Elly' and 'A Separation.' Honestly? It's great. A bit weaker than those two, sure, but still solid.
What’s wild is you can tell it's the same director within the first ten minutes. His formula across these three movies is pretty much the same: he spends the first third introducing characters and setups. Usually, there are way too many people to track easily, and the scenes are packed with tiny details—stuff you'll definitely miss on a first watch. Then, he grabs one specific detail and turns it into this massive central conflict. From there, everyone starts dissecting everything from the first act from different angles. The audience does the same thing because, frankly, there was just too much info to process at once to know what actually happened. It's this messy, "Rashomon-style" approach where he tries to hunt down the truth.
I could go on forever about the themes, really. But I'll just say this: it’s a breath of fresh air to see an American director focusing on the middle class instead of falling back on tired tropes like kids in danger or some radical extremist stereotypes.
Also, interesting note—Farhad hasn't been persecuted or thrown in jail by the government, even though his stuff is just as controversial as his colleague Panahi's. You know, the guy who's basically under house arrest right now while European festivals force awards on him, probably trying to sway some American court decisions.
Anyone here seen his first two, 'Beautiful City' and 'Dancing in the Dark'? How do they stack up?
wiki
What’s wild is you can tell it's the same director within the first ten minutes. His formula across these three movies is pretty much the same: he spends the first third introducing characters and setups. Usually, there are way too many people to track easily, and the scenes are packed with tiny details—stuff you'll definitely miss on a first watch. Then, he grabs one specific detail and turns it into this massive central conflict. From there, everyone starts dissecting everything from the first act from different angles. The audience does the same thing because, frankly, there was just too much info to process at once to know what actually happened. It's this messy, "Rashomon-style" approach where he tries to hunt down the truth.
I could go on forever about the themes, really. But I'll just say this: it’s a breath of fresh air to see an American director focusing on the middle class instead of falling back on tired tropes like kids in danger or some radical extremist stereotypes.
Also, interesting note—Farhad hasn't been persecuted or thrown in jail by the government, even though his stuff is just as controversial as his colleague Panahi's. You know, the guy who's basically under house arrest right now while European festivals force awards on him, probably trying to sway some American court decisions.
Anyone here seen his first two, 'Beautiful City' and 'Dancing in the Dark'? How do they stack up?
wiki