CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Philosophy › Tech Talk

Tech Talk

Started by wiredbear2 · · 👁 4 views · 8 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants wiredbear2Aswiftcobra15hollowviper72Rachel Bishop
wiredbear2 wiredbear2 Active MemberOP
93 messages
joined Nov 2008
#1 ·
Technology

After catching up with a colleague just a few moments ago,
I found myself feeling inspired to start this thread and hear what you all think about something...
We were actually debating The Matrix Reloaded, which, if I'm being honest, just didn't land for me, leading to
my colleague practically tearing my argument apart... Of course, the question follows: why didn't I enjoy it?
It was a combination of factors, but primarily the sheer saturation of special effects, which felt excessive
compared to what I perceived as a rather lackluster narrative. He, on the other hand, loved it specifically because of the "massive
leap forward in technology" showcased within the film. But that’s enough about the movie itself...
It was really just the catalyst for opening this discussion.

I find myself wondering—and I want to know what you think—why are people so obsessed with technology these days, especially now that it's woven into every single aspect of our lives? It isn't some distant, fantastic concept relegated to the sci-fi novels
penned back in the 1950s anymore. Now, I certainly understand the tech enthusiasts out there who live and breathe this stuff—it's their hobby, their passion, maybe even their career. I'm not talking about them. I'm talking about this global trend that pushes these shiny new "tech gadgets" into the spotlight, making us feel like we absolutely need them, not because they serve a true purpose, but because of the artificial demand manufactured by constant media advertising...
I’ve never been particularly fond of the cyberpunk vision of the future portrayed in films like Blade Runner. I genuinely fear that if our sole pursuit becomes a constant race to see who can implement the latest tech, it might end up taking more from us than it should...

P.S. I'm trying to touch upon the downsides of technology here, because please don't misunderstand me—I certainly
don't shy away from the comforts it provides, but that's exactly it; I view it as a tool, not as an ideology...
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#2 ·
I honestly can't stand the whole cell phone culture we've built. Seriously, it feels like over 90% of people are glued to their devices, constantly firing off texts, multimedia messages, or whatever else.
Just look at those tech crazies in Japan! They go absolutely overboard with this useless gadgetry—stuff like MP3 players sewn into undershirts, vibrators built into underwear, or LCD displays embedded right into shirt collars. It’s honestly ridiculous how much nonsense they come up with.

In case you haven't guessed, I don't own a cell phone. It's not like I can't afford one; I just want some peace and quiet without something constantly vibrating in my pocket. Even though the nature of my work pretty much demands being reachable, I still choose to live without one.

The biggest side effect of all this technology is going to be massive pollution, but hey, who cares, right? As long as the money keeps rolling in, that's all anyone seems to care about (not that I agree).

Let's hit the beach!
swiftcobra15 swiftcobra15 Regular
305 messages
joined Dec 2002
#3 ·
wiredbear2 said:Technology.

I’ve always felt uneasy about the cyberpunk future depicted in films like Blade Runner. I worry that if our only driving force becomes a relentless race for technological supremacy, we might end up losing much more than we gain.

Let’s talk about getting our definitions straight.😁
Everything we create is essentially an application of technology. Even when someone was crafting their very first spearhead, they were utilizing a specific technological process.

Nowadays, people usually equate that term with sophisticated, modern technology—which, in turn, becomes synonymous with the needs of the arts.

Here’s a genuine question for the group: Is a smartphone actually a necessity in our lives, or have we just been conditioned to believe it is? 😉
wiredbear2 wiredbear2 Active MemberOP
93 messages
joined Nov 2008
#4 ·
Heh... smartphones. It really feels like they changed everything, doesn't it? Just five years ago, they were a luxury for early adopters, but now, it’s almost impossible to find someone without one. They’ve become one of those essential "tools" I rely on daily. That said, I’m still clinging to my very first smartphone; I have absolutely no intention of upgrading until this old thing finally gives up the ghost. It’s a bit of a Clamp, honestly, but I’ve grown attached to it... 😛 For the most part, it isn't causing me any major headaches.
But then there are those days when I just lose my patience while riding the subway or a city bus, especially when it's nothing but constant buzzing and vibrating,
hellooo... 😠
Everything would be fine if people actually understood basic etiquette. I truly believe that personal privacy should be our top priority, yet it feels like it's being eroded more and more every single day. In my opinion, we can point the finger at certain "global trends"🙄
wiredbear2 wiredbear2 Active MemberOP
93 messages
joined Nov 2008
#5 ·
I would really love it if we could steer this conversation away from being exclusively about smartphones, please... 😉
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#6 ·
I’m honestly starting to lose my patience with computers. Or, to be more precise, the computer manufacturers. Every single time, they drop some "revolutionary" new tech that’s actually been around in theory for at least twenty years, all just to squeeze every last cent out of us. We get these new processors and software updates designed to feed them, yet they barely offer any actual new functionality—they just create massive amounts of e-waste, again, purely to pad their bottom lines. It’s pure profit at the expense of Mother Nature, and she’s clearly done playing nice, hitting us back with these brutal natural disasters.

But let’s be real, it isn't just the tech industry. Look at the auto industry. There are viable alternatives out there—think about alternative fuels. Why are we still relying so heavily on oil when it pollutes so much? Because, once again, it's all about the money.

What I'm trying to say is, there is technology available right now that has a much smaller footprint than what we're currently using.

Just imagine one of those visions from Microsoft. A fully automated smart home. Sure, it sounds cool that it's even possible, but try picturing actually living in a house like that. You don't even have to get up to flip a light switch, you don't even have to press a button on a remote—you just bark commands to change the channel. Honestly, the idea of living in a house where I have to do everything while sitting or lying down just feels lazy and weird to me.

Anyway, enough of that for now!
hollowviper72 hollowviper72 Regular
268 messages
joined May 2004
#7 ·
First off—technology is pure power. It’s been this way since we first chipped away at stone tools, all the way up to the high-tech gadgets we carry in our pockets today; technology exists to amplify what a human being can actually achieve. It makes us more capable. If you have access to a powerful computer, you can accomplish infinitely more than someone without one. Even something as simple as having a smartphone gives you an edge over those who don't, because the modern world is essentially built like a massive machine—and in this machine, you need specialized sub-machines just to function efficiently. Beyond that, there's this subtle, almost subconscious psychological element: if you're rocking a top-of-the-line MacBook Pro while someone else is struggling with a decade-old budget laptop, society tends to view you as "more capable" or higher status. It's a flawed logic, but it's there.

Second: tech gadgets are nothing more than status symbols. Let's be honest—humans have always tried to use their possessions to signal where they sit on the social ladder. It's sad, really, but it's true. The latest trend is all about the "newest thing." The person with the iPhone that has the most advanced camera, the integrated AI, and the sleekest design is seen as having higher status (at least according to subjective societal whims). Or look at cars—if you're driving a high-end Tesla or a beefy Ford Raptor, people automatically assume you're more successful, a "bigger deal," or simply better than the guy in the beat-up sedan. It's total bullshit, of course, but society accepts these metrics, so that's why they work.

And thirdly: technology represents comfort. Historically speaking, humans have always traded freedom for convenience. We are hardwired to choose the path of least resistance, which means people will always be more than willing to sacrifice a little bit of their autonomy in exchange for a little more ease in their daily lives. But here's the catch—the more stuff you accumulate, the more you have to manage, maintain, and worry about. Eventually, for many, these objects become the very yardstick by which life is measured, and quite a few people end up becoming slaves to their own belongings.
Materialism has become the deity of the modern age. And honestly? We already have the temples built for it.
Rachel Bishop Rachel Bishop Active Member
80 messages
joined Jul 2003
#8 ·
hollowviper72 said:First, technology equals power. It’s an old story, from flint tools to today’s silicon chips; tech exists to amplify human capability. If you have a MacBook, you outpace the person who doesn't. In a society built like a massive machine, you need machines just to function within it. Even more cynical? Having a faster processor provides a subconscious sense of superiority over those with outdated hardware.

Second, gadgets are status symbols. People have always used possessions to signal their rank in the social hierarchy. It’s pathetic, really. Now, it’s all about the latest iPhone or having a Tesla parked in the driveway. We pretend these things make us better or more capable. It’s nonsense, but society accepts the lie, so the cycle continues.

Third, technology offers comfort. Humans have always traded freedom for convenience. Most people will gladly surrender a slice of their autonomy if it means life gets slightly easier. But there's a catch: the more stuff you own, the more that stuff owns you. Eventually, objects become the yardstick for a life well-lived, and people end up enslaved by their own belongings.
Materialism is the new religion. And we’re already building the cathedrals.

👍
To have or to be... the question remains. As it always has.😉
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#9 ·
Honestly, I think you’ve been watching way too many Terminator movies—you know, the whole Skynet scenario where AI decides to wipe out humanity...
The truth is, we develop technology because we’re afraid of what we don't understand. There are plenty of technologies out there that carry health risks—think about nuclear reactors, coal-fired power plants, heavy manufacturing, or even just our smartphones. But the thing is, everything can be regulated. Sure, industrial runoff pollutes our water supply, but we solve that with advanced filtration systems, whether they're chemical, biological, or mechanical. People worry about cell phones being carcinogenic, but the industry responds by engineering devices with much lower SAR levels (radiation absorption rates) and even selling anti-radiation stickers. We manage the risks.
You really need to dial back the sci-fi imagination a bit. You have to accept that machines aren't going to take over the world anytime soon—not even in the next 100,000 years, given how "fast" tech actually evolves!

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads