#1 ·
Proposal to fix the quality of the History subforum.
Right now, the only person actually moderating the History section is Zoran Oštrić.
Out of the three official moderators listed, he’s basically the only one doing any actual work.
I’m suggesting that Administration steps in and implements a new management model for the History subforum (including its two sub-sections) by appointing two interim co-moderators. This would create some much-needed balance and finally take the massive weight off Zoran Oštrić's shoulders—honestly, his constant grind is starting to wear down the whole system here at the forum.
These interim co-mods could be hand-picked by Administration, or better yet, the History community itself could vote them in through an open application process and a poll.
The History section absolutely needs a balanced moderation team.
Having just one moderator isn't enough—especially not someone who tends to run things like a private club.
Please, seriously, give this proposal some thought.
Right now, the only person actually moderating the History section is Zoran Oštrić.
Out of the three official moderators listed, he’s basically the only one doing any actual work.
I’m suggesting that Administration steps in and implements a new management model for the History subforum (including its two sub-sections) by appointing two interim co-moderators. This would create some much-needed balance and finally take the massive weight off Zoran Oštrić's shoulders—honestly, his constant grind is starting to wear down the whole system here at the forum.
These interim co-mods could be hand-picked by Administration, or better yet, the History community itself could vote them in through an open application process and a poll.
The History section absolutely needs a balanced moderation team.
Having just one moderator isn't enough—especially not someone who tends to run things like a private club.
Please, seriously, give this proposal some thought.