CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › IT › Software › Which antivirus should I use?

Which antivirus should I use?

Started by Jeffrey Martinez4 · · 👁 3 views · 27 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Jeffrey Martinez4crimsongull3gentlepanther32silvermason12Raymond Carter2hollowdriver14Scott Lee7Terry Chase8swiftgull60shadowtiger37silverridge43Andrew Davis2Chloe Hughes2Joseph Chavez7Amy Brooks8Tyler Rivera45Michelle Ward10hollowgull5Matthew Harris2Jerry ThompsonHannah GrayGeorge Baker66Ryan Wilson2Emily Sullivan97 …
Jeffrey Martinez4 Jeffrey Martinez4 NewcomerOP
1 message
joined Oct 2006
#1 ·
What’s actually considered "in" right now when it comes to antivirus software? I'm looking for something that can handle most attacks without eating up 50% of my system resources like some bloated bloatware.
Honestly, I’ve been running totally bare for the last few months and I feel great.🙂
I used to have one of those local brands, but the subscription expired and I haven't bothered since.
I stay on top of my Windows updates, though, so the machine seems to be running pretty smoothly enough.
Right now, I’m in the middle of reinstalling an entire network—three PCs total—and since it's been a minute since I’ve messed with this stuff, I figured I'd ask: are there any new Windows versions out there that you guys would actually recommend?
crimsongull3 crimsongull3 Newcomer
6 messages
joined May 2006
#2 ·
So, what’s actually considered "cool" right now? Honestly, hard to say—it changes every week—but I do know one thing for sure: this stuff is solid, free, and won't absolutely murder your system performance:

Avira AntiVir

As for Windows itself, if you're rocking some beastly rig with a massive amount of RAM and lightning-fast drives, then yeah, Windows Vista might be worth looking at. But if you aren't running a powerhouse, honestly, even Windows XP Service Pack 2 still gets the job done just fine...
gentlepanther32 gentlepanther32 Newcomer
1 message
joined Oct 2006
#3 ·
I’m in complete agreement with crimsongull3 here—Norton AntiVirus really is the gold standard. I've been running it for over a year now, and even when I'm reckless enough to browse those sketchy corners of the web, there isn't a single trace of a virus to be found. ... ...
silvermason12 silvermason12 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Dec 2003
#4 ·
If you ask me... McAfee Internet Security is definitely the way to go. It’s incredibly fast, and more importantly, it packs all that essential protection into one seamless package—you get the antivirus, the firewall, and all those other little essentials too.
Raymond Carter2 Raymond Carter2 Active Member
108 messages
joined Jul 2004
#5 ·
Watch what you download and you won't need any 😁
hollowdriver14 hollowdriver14 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Oct 2006
#6 ·
Norton AntiVirus for viruses
Spyware Terminator for spyware

@Raymond Carter2/">@@Raymond Carter2
Dammit, you can't be on guard every single second of the day.
Scott Lee7 Scott Lee7 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Nov 2008
#7 ·
You don't even have to manually download anything; just by visiting certain websites, 😁
if you're using Internet Explorer 6, it downloads itself automatically 😁
Terry Chase8 Terry Chase8 Member
12 messages
joined Jul 2009
#8 ·
NOD32😎
swiftgull60 swiftgull60 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Apr 2006
#9 ·
Terry Chase8 said:NOD32😎

🙏
shadowtiger37 shadowtiger37 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Aug 2006
#10 ·
Seriously, just grab the new version of McAfee 6. It’s honestly killer—way better than NOD32, even if it does hog a little more RAM or whatever!
silverridge43 silverridge43 Member
12 messages
joined Nov 2007
#11 ·
And why on earth won't McAfee 6 work alongside ZoneAlarm?
Andrew Davis2 Andrew Davis2 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jan 2007
#12 ·
NOD32 and McAfee are definitely the heavy hitters here, but honestly, even those free options like AVG or Norton AntiVirus aren't half bad. If you’ve got a solid firewall running, you barely even need an antivirus—it really just comes down to using a bit of common sense!
crimsongull3 crimsongull3 Newcomer
6 messages
joined May 2006
#13 ·
silverridge43 said:so why can't I run Kaspersky 6.0 alongside ZoneAlarm?

Look, just go into the McAfee settings under "real-time Protection setting" and find where it says "Protection against network attacks"—you gotta check the box that says "Disable Protection against network attacks" to make them play nice...
Chloe Hughes2 Chloe Hughes2 Member
29 messages
joined Aug 2008
#14 ·
Ivan Bajić Baja said:You should definitely go with the new version of Norton 6. It’s really solid and performs much better than Norton Antivirus, though it does eat up a bit more system resources.

I don't know what you're talking about. If you actually take the time to configure Norton Antivirus properly, it’s easily the best option out there. You can't just click "next-next-next" through the installer and expect peak performance 👍 , you have to be intentional 😬
. It’s all about the settings. Here is how you optimize it:

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=37509
Joseph Chavez7 Joseph Chavez7 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Aug 2006
#15 ·
Dell said:Look, debating what’s actually considered "cool" these days is a rabbit hole I’m not interested in diving into, but I can say with absolute certainty that this particular option is solid, free, and won't turn your computer into a paperweight:

McAfee Personal edition Classic

As far as operating systems go, if you're running a beast of a rig packed with massive amounts of RAM and lightning-fast drives—especially if you've moved up to Windows Vista—you might have options, but otherwise, Windows XP service pack 2 still gets the job done perfectly fine...

👍
Amy Brooks8 Amy Brooks8 Member
27 messages
joined Sep 2007
#16 ·
Either grab Bitdefender 10 Pro+ or just go with Norton 6
Whatever you do, stay away from Norton Antivirus. I used to run it, and the thing would swear my system was clean while I was staring right at a virus. Then I switched to Bitdefender, and honestly, Norton is just a massive pile of junk—even if it actually manages to flag something, it can't even delete it properly. It’s useless. 👎
Bitdefender is actually solid; it’s got the anti-spam, anti-spyware, and the firewall all built-in. Plus, the updates roll out every couple of hours and it doesn't lag my machine at all.
🧐 🧐 🧐
Chloe Hughes2 Chloe Hughes2 Member
29 messages
joined Aug 2008
#17 ·
Norton Antivirus needs to be configured correctly
Tyler Rivera45 Tyler Rivera45 Member
14 messages
joined Nov 2006
#18 ·
Norton Antivirus
Michelle Ward10 Michelle Ward10 Member
26 messages
joined Jul 2012
#19 ·
I’m with you there, Norton 🙏 🙏
The only headache I ever had was with Norton Internet Security because it completely choked my DSL connection. I couldn't get online at all—it was just a bit too finicky for my liking.
Right now, I’m running the latest version of five alongside Norton Anti-Hacker, and honestly, it works like a charm.
I've never felt safer. Hehe.
hollowgull5 hollowgull5 Active Member
71 messages
joined Aug 2007
#20 ·
sled 10 👍

the_Deejay said:I'm out here browsing all the sketchy corners of the web and I haven't seen a single virus... nothing at all...

like those sites where you might find stuff like 😕

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads