CheckEmoji Community Β· the emoji forum
🏠 Home πŸ†• What's new ❓ Unanswered πŸ”₯ Popular πŸ“‘ RSS Members πŸ‘₯ 0 online log in Β· register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Why was this thread locked?????????

Why was this thread locked?????????

Started by Daniel Lewis2 · · πŸ‘ 4 views · 6 replies

πŸ“‘ Subscribe to replies

Participants Daniel Lewis2Paul Davis51mellowraven22redmarlin3
Daniel Lewis2 Daniel Lewis2 NewcomerOP
1 message
joined Sep 2009
#1 ·
Why on earth has this thread been locked?

😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠
Daniel Lewis2 Daniel Lewis2 NewcomerOP
1 message
joined Sep 2009
#2 ·
This silence is the absolute peak of arbitrary tyranny and sheer rudeness from the moderator team!! If a thread is posted in the wrong subforum, why on earth is it so difficult for you gentlemen to simply MOVE the topic instead of locking it? Or at least provide a single post explaining the reasoning behind the closure. I ask hereβ€”and get nothingβ€”and then I'm left wondering... what the hell is actually going on with this forum?! Shouldn't your primary concern be maintaining a pleasant atmosphere and ensuring user satisfaction? Of course notβ€”you have plenty of users to throw at you, so you couldn't care less. It’s no wonder things stay this way... I needed the answer to that thread for my schoolwork, and it was genuinely urgent, yet you just lock the thread πŸ™„ without a word of explanationβ€”which isn't even the worst partβ€”but then you have the audacity to remain silent when I ask for clarification right here. Could you really not have just moved it, or offered some sort of reason? You prioritize nitpicking trivialities like a misplaced subforum, while the actual garbage existing on this site gets swept under the rug.

Let me give you an example:
Nobody seems to care about the provocations, slander, and insults directed at certain individuals by one specific group of users over in the "all sorts" subforumβ€”and likely elsewhere too. Not a single moderator bothers to shut down those threads or issue warnings to the spammers who exist solely to provoke and escalate tension. Yet, it's vital that a perfectly normal thread, one that doesn't provoke anyone, gets locked without any explanation whatsoever.

😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠
Paul Davis51 Paul Davis51 Member
36 messages
joined Nov 2006
#3 ·
It is all laid out clearly enough in the rules of this subforum, so I fail to see why reading them is such an insurmountable challenge for you.
mellowraven22 mellowraven22 Active Member
105 messages
joined Jan 2007
#4 ·
It wouldn't hurt if you actually gave it a read. Rules and stuff you gotta follow. subforums natural science Look, before you start losing your cool and going all hysterical on me here... just check the facts. It's all right there in writing.
Daniel Lewis2 Daniel Lewis2 NewcomerOP
1 message
joined Sep 2009
#5 ·
Is it really that difficult for you people to glance at my signature and realize I'm a man? 😁

Anyway... regarding this whole mess:
I’m not even claiming I opened this thread in the wrong subforum. But locking a thread without so much as a word of explanationβ€”that is just extreme. Why couldn't you have simply moved the post to the correct section instead of shutting it down entirely?

Furthermore, I have serious grievances with the rules themselves. These "rules"β€”as I've mentionedβ€”are pedantic nonsense, obsessing over trivialities like whether a math problem belongs under "natural science" or within "rescue assistance." Apparently, violating such a sacred decree is a mortal sin that warrants the immediate destruction of the thread πŸ™„ as if the fact that I needed an urgent answer for a school assignmentβ€”something affecting my actual gradeβ€”is completely irrelevant to anyone here πŸ™„ The rule-breaker should be the one failing their class, right? Who cares about that, apparently. Is that how it works?!

Like I saidβ€”these rules are nothing more than nitpicking over trifles, like insisting a topic shouldn't be in the main forum but tucked away in some obscure sub-subforum. And where is the rule against escalating tension, provoking other users, derailing discussions, leaking private information, or engaging in insults and slander?! There are plenty of cases involving that kind of behavior over in the "all sorts" forum. Where is the rule prohibiting *that*? Where are the moderators who actually penalize those individuals?! The moderators won't lift a finger unless someone starts pulling them by the skirt and screaming, "Lock that garbage thread!" So please, have the decency to admit that posting in the wrong section is considered a greater offense than everything I just listed in this paragraph. πŸ™„
redmarlin3 redmarlin3 Active Member
132 messages
joined Apr 2010
#6 ·
Anyway, they hand out those certificates at NASA for stuff like that, so you actually did alright. It passed. It went through. Whatever... 😁
Daniel Lewis2 Daniel Lewis2 NewcomerOP
1 message
joined Sep 2009
#7 ·
The sheer accuracy of your claim serves as yet another testament to the tyranny and absolute whims of the moderators...--

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

πŸ”— Similar threads