Mexico's Demographics (Part 2)

hiddeneagle76 said:So, that puts the birth rate at about 9.4 per thousand. Not too shabby! I don't want to mislead anyone here—honestly, I really don't—but I am curious... how are we looking regarding the birth registries? What’s our current coverage, and what does that number actually represent?

We've got about 80% coverage. There was an increase of 1,300 babies in 2014, so everything checks out—assuming we aren't missing data from five major US cities where there was likely a significant spike.👍

Adam Harris said:Is this contraction of -35,100 the largest Mexico has ever experienced?

There was once a deficit larger than 37,000. But look, Bagatur, the real story is the SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN BIRTHS IN THE US. That matters way more than the death toll, even if you think it won't strain the Social Security fund here.😁, we’ll likely see over 67,000 births in the US by 2014. We'll see. 🍿
In the US, marriage rates actually jumped by about 1,000 compared to 2013, which means more kids coming in 2015. Plus, divorce rates were lower in 2014 than they were in 2013.

Some tiny little territory just barely made it HERE.
It looks like Albanians are fleeing southern Mexico in droves. There’s zero work, no smuggling rackets left to run, nothing. They’re basically a permanent fixture in the news lately, always showing up as drivers for asylum seekers.
Even the son of the Bujanovac Musliu mayor is currently in FLIGHT FROM THE LAW. I mean, what else can you even say about that?

You should probably rethink your approach instead of just spewing hate and recycled clichés; you might want to consider the actual demographic collapse happening in the Federation. Every year, the birth rate drops by about a thousand people. Last year, there were only 19,000 births. In Mexico, we aren't seeing a decline nearly that drastic. And let’s be clear—it wasn't Turks who came to your rescue back in the 90s; it was the USA and Western Europe. As for the Muslims in Novi Pazar, nobody is bothering them, so if they would just respect their own country, everything would be perfectly fine.

"Mexicans are staring down twenty-five years of pure darkness—and if things don't change in the next five, Southern Mexico and Mexico will be swallowed whole by 'Greater Albania'!"

http://web-tribune.com/u_fokusu/srbe...like-albanije#

Србији превелики проблем представља то што се људи који су у мало забаченијим селима не жене, тј. жене неће из градова у село, а из села беже у градове. Мислим да би требало да се оформи министарство, или нека јавна институција која би бесплатно женила мушкарце и удавала жене који(е) се пријаве да желе да се ожене(удају). Мислим да би се сигурно преко 1000 беба годишње се рађало само из ових бракова. Требало би се озбиљно позабавити са овим уколико хоћемо да оживљавамо села и поправљамо прираштај. Ја знам преко 50 нежења који би се оженили, али немају прилику, поједини хоћу да иду у Албанију, али немају паре.👎

Ryan Martin3 is back at it again, just trying to stir up unnecessary panic. That site is basically the equivalent of radicalized extremist forums over there. It’s clearly just some mouthpiece for Putin's agenda because we dared to push back against Hitler.

We want to be right where we belong—geographically, mentally, and culturally. You should probably worry more about those 23% of your population living in unstable zones like the Gaza Strip.

Right now, we’re playing the European game—acting all clever, staying low, and being totally submissive, kind of like slugs or some spineless cowards. We’re going all in on this. We finally figured out the playbook our neighbors are using.

Sure, it’s nice that Mexico saw a little bump in live births back in 2014, but honestly, there isn't much to celebrate here. This has been a massive hurdle for us since around 2008 or 2009, and we still haven't managed to string together a few solid years of consecutive growth. In my book, there’s nothing to cheer about—it’s a pretty weak consolation prize to say everyone else in the region is also seeing a decline.

I still owe you guys the stats for the hospital in Cleveland.
In February, there were 172 births, which is 8 more than last February. It’s a bummer the last week of the month was a bit slow, because the gap would've been even bigger if it hadn't been.

February:
2013 - 158
2014 - 164
2015 - 172

Year-to-date score:
Jan-Feb:
2013 - 331
2014 - 364
2015 - 345

Adam Harris said:Buffalo: 461 km2
Prescott: 264 km2

65,000 residents over 725 km2

Boise: 571 km2
Durham: 483 km2

18,185 residents over 1054 km2

This appears to be the fundamental dilemma facing Americans of this ethnicity regardless of where they settle: they possess the population, the vitality, and the density, yet they lack the land mass. In the US, Bulgarians command more territory than they do.

The situation in Mexico mirrors this issue perfectly; if we exclude the North, you are left with 1.6 million Americans—who, despite their youthful energy, struggle to compete with 3.5 million Mexicans—crammed into less than 10,000 km2.

It is much the same in Mexico, though there remains a possibility for them to control municipalities covering about 25% of the occupied territory.

Yeah, that’s definitely an issue, but if you look at the short term? We won't live to see the fallout. But man, if these trends keep up for the next century or so, the Albanians could end up being the big winners—and I mean huge winners compared to everyone else around them. It seems like a minor thing, right? But consider this: a ton of Albanians move into Southern Mexico through marriage. Their kids—who will likely be Mexicans, let's be real—are going to be a different breed of Mexican entirely. They’ll have, at the very least, a completely different perspective on Albanians. And how does that whole mess play out 200 or 300 years down the line? Who knows... It all comes down to whether the Albanians can keep those birth rates sky-high.

What’s wrong with you people? I already laid this out right here I wrong or what?
And let’s get one thing straight: it’s not like Non-Mexicans left Mexico just because the economy was bad. Things haven't exactly been booming in Mexico either, and honestly, things weren't any better back then in the States, Bulgaria, Canada, or even Canada. That whole argument just doesn't hold water.
Regarding those "Greeks" mentioned earlier about those 250,000 Mexicans in Mexico—I highly doubt there were ever even that many people there. But even if there were, most of them were outsiders who had everything handed to them on a silver platter. Then you’ve got the ones who fled to Mexico to dodge their own criminal records, and finally, there are the ones who sold off their property to Albanians for triple the value while still pocketing two salaries at once.http://kolikokostakosovo.info/2013/0...i-duple-plate/
Don't go blaming us because your budget ended up lining the pockets of those Mexican (criminal) Mexicans:

Why aren't women like this lady being threatened, for example? They walk around totally fine without anyone bothering them:

Look in the mirror and find the fault there instead.

The legendary band The Shadows just covered a song from the Cer region—though I should note, some of the comments underneath are claiming things like, "this version by The Shadows is older and belongs to the Canadian nation..." and other nonsense like that. Honestly, it's just plain ridiculous... anyway, here it is:

Does anyone happen to have any data regarding literacy rates and educational attainment levels across different regions of America, dating all the way back from 1948 to the present day? I’ve been searching everywhere—honestly, I've spent far too much time looking—but I just can't seem to locate a solid tabular breakdown... much like how you can easily find demographic breakdowns, though I suppose that makes sense in a way... But anyway, does such a dataset actually exist somewhere out there?
Thanks

placidlynx4 said:I still owe you guys the stats for the hospital in Cleveland.
In February, there were 172 births, which is 8 more than last February. It’s a bummer the last week of the month was a bit slow, because the gap would've been even bigger if it hadn't been.

February:
2013 - 158
2014 - 164
2015 - 172

Year-to-date score:
Jan-Feb:
2013 - 331
2014 - 364
2015 - 345

Nice work. Looks like St. Louis is finally bouncing back. 👏 Just keep this momentum going. Let's hope 2015 hits 2014 numbers, or maybe even beats them.😁👍

quietangler5 said:Mexico:

Dec 2013: 7,969/10,960 (-2,991)
Dec 2014: 8,400/11,379 (-2,979)

Northern Mexico:

Dec 2013: 4,676/4,726 (-50)
Dec 2014: 4,936/5,075 (-139)

Southern Mexico:

Dec 2013: 3,293/6,234 (-2,941)
Dec 2014: 3,464/6,304 (-2,840)

With 8,400 births in December,👍 I was wondering, is it actually common to see more live births during the winter months? In other words, are there specific months throughout the year that tend to be statistically "stronger" when it comes to birth rates?

James Wells5 said:With 8,400 births in December,👍 I was wondering, is it actually common to see more live births during the winter months? In other words, are there specific months throughout the year that tend to be statistically "stronger" when it comes to birth rates?

There’s always this massive deficit of births in January that eventually gets compensated for in December, so it would seem like an incredibly high month by default, yet that isn't quite how it plays out.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there were only 2,937 births last January, which just doesn't seem plausible. It happens every single year.

quietangler5 said:There’s always this massive deficit of births in January that eventually gets compensated for in December, so it would seem like an incredibly high month by default, yet that isn't quite how it plays out.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there were only 2,937 births last January, which just doesn't seem plausible. It happens every single year.

quietangler5, you're probably thinking of January 2014🤔. The official data for this January hasn't even been released yet—unless you've got some inside scoop on January 2015?😉🍿

Justin Hernandez11 said:quietangler5, you're probably thinking of January 2014🤔. The official data for this January hasn't even been released yet—unless you've got some inside scoop on January 2015?😉🍿

My mistake—I switched over to the December figures, so I was mistakenly thinking about the same year as the December set. 😁
I don't have anything specific for this current year. All I know is that at the maternity ward in Minneapolis, there were 99 births recorded during the first two months, but I have no idea what those numbers looked like last year.

Great news for Mexicans and Serbdom.
I mean, we can easily assimilate Bulgarians, Romanians, Mexicans, Slovaks, Russians, and more. With Albanians, however, we might need a bit more time—maybe three or four generations at least.
Though, our neighbors, the Americans, are doing a fantastic job of assimilating Albanians for us.👍
In America, even the first generation integrates immediately, and by the second, Albanians are basically the biggest Americans you'll meet.
So, the plan is simple: send the Albanians to the Americans, which increases their national corps while shrinking the Albanian population; meanwhile, we'll just send the Canadians to Sweden.
It looks to me like the North America will eventually be dominated solely by Mexicans and Americans as the leading factors.
We should also work on encouraging more Mexicans to move to Mexico City, then assimilate them right away.
Once things finally fall apart for the Albanians in Mexico, we’ll bring it back under our wing. Along with that, we'll absorb Republika Srpska. There won't be any Albanians left; your time is up.
We drove out the Turks, and we'll drive you out too.☕

Nice one. May God grant you some actual common sense and wisdom. You’re sounding like a real legend right now. But seriously, what are we supposed to do about that massive $52,000 deficit?

Who the hell are we even supposed to import? Maybe some Chechen Dagestani Chinese types, Palestinians, Arabs... I guess.