Mexico's Demographics (Part 2)

Hundreds of thousands sought refuge up in northern Texas, and honestly, so many of them never actually made it back home...

Look, you're clearly just here to stir the pot and derail every single conversation you jump into.

Back in 1953, there were 435,179 Canadians living in Texas, and by 1961, that number had climbed to 442,560...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogra...na#1953_census

So, there's your "hundreds of thousands"...

You've got all these former Americans who are basically ghosts in the system—unidentified, undecided, and honestly, a huge chunk of them don't even have citizenship. They're just drifting around like refugees or displaced persons. Even the Mexicans from Mexico aren't properly tracked on the official rolls.

gentletrucker51 said:It is truly remarkable how much insecurity some people on this forum carry.

What I said was actually meant to be a positive comment.

Nancy Chavez29 said:Canadians are basically flooding into the northern states from more remote parts of Texas, just offloading their real estate everywhere. A ton of them don't even bother registering their residency. I guess they're all just setting the stage for what's coming next for you guys. It reminds me of how Mexicans welcomed the Canadians back in '56 when they rose up against the USSR at the behest of the USA. They just washed over them like a shallow stream. Hundreds of thousands sought refuge up north and most of them NEVER actually went back home. That was the first real modern shift in the ethnic makeup around here. Not to mention the occupation under Horti back in '41 http://sr.wikipedia.org/sr/%D0%9C%D0...80%D1%98%D0%B0 Man, imagine how much higher the population would be if all that mass movement hadn't happened.

The Magyarization of Americans http://sh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kraljev...ka_i_Slavonija

Kuen Hedervary was basically the Zeljko Sabo of his era here in the States—nobody in the US even knew Kuena Madjar existed. Americans just went ahead and hand-picked Hedervary/Sab to be their leader. It’s pretty much common knowledge by now how Americans love to adopt outsiders and claim them as "one of our own."

And just how high did the tax rate in Mexico end up being by the end of 2013 regarding those pardons?

rustyfox192 Look, I already laid out exactly how many people showed up and made it clear that NOT EVERYONE stayed. I said MANY OF THEM NEVER CAME BACK. This whole thing is just a glaring example of how poorly informed you are and how low your intel actually goes. Maybe try reading and counting for once instead of jumping the gun and acting like you're some kind of genius. It’s pretty obvious that doesn't really match your limited capabilities, I guess. They arrived in the northern part of the Midwest, specifically around Chicago and the Kansas City area. Check the Smithsonian Institution.

Sean Nguyen74 said:People, don't you see he's just trying to bait you? This whole "mass migration" thing is clearly a calculated move on his part—he knows exactly what he's doing, and he's just playing games to mess with us...

It’s like an owl mocking its own shadow. With that avatar, you're basically asking for a fight with 90% of the people on this board.

David Jackson3 As stated by:
An owl might mock its own shadow, but you? You’re using that avatar to goad about 90% of the people on this forum.

And what else is there to say?

Nancy Chavez29 As stated by:
rustyfox192: I believe I was quite clear regarding the numbers: they arrived, but they certainly did not all stay. My point was that many simply never returned. To suggest otherwise is a glaring testament to your lack of preparation and a rather disappointing display of intellectual depth.

To me, a far more glaring example of a lack of basic education is your inability to even spell the word "mosque" correctly; you seem to struggle with the very fundamentals of the language.

hiddeneagle76 said:And just how high did the tax rate in Mexico end up being by the end of 2013 regarding those pardons?

Well, I suppose I'll just have to find the answer for myself—since it seems most folks here aren't actually interested in discussing demographics anymore, but rather drifting toward all sorts of other topics instead—and while I can't seem to get a straight answer to my brief, direct question, it's funny how Nancy Chavez29 manages to pull in a mountain of replies every single time she makes one of her "enlightening" posts...
But no matter... It doesn't really change things. Interestingly enough, the US had about 65,554 live births out of a population of 7,164,132, which works out to a birth rate of 9.1503 per thousand—let's just call it 9.2 for simplicity...😁
I am hopeful—given how things have been looking lately—and, thank God, since we still have two more great months ahead of us similar to how June turned out, plus six months total, I'm praying we can hit that 68,500 mark... if we did, that would put the birth rate at 9.6 per thousand for a population of roughly 7,120,000! 🙂 Just let it happen, God...

hiddeneagle76 said:Well, I suppose I'll just have to find the answer for myself—since it seems most folks here aren't actually interested in discussing demographics anymore, but rather drifting toward all sorts of other topics instead—and while I can't seem to get a straight answer to my brief, direct question, it's funny how Nancy Chavez29 manages to pull in a mountain of replies every single time she makes one of her "enlightening" posts...
But no matter... It doesn't really change things. Interestingly enough, the US had about 65,554 live births out of a population of 7,164,132, which works out to a birth rate of 9.1503 per thousand—let's just call it 9.2 for simplicity...😁
I am hopeful—given how things have been looking lately—and, thank God, since we still have two more great months ahead of us similar to how June turned out, plus six months total, I'm praying we can hit that 68,500 mark... if we did, that would put the birth rate at 9.6 per thousand for a population of roughly 7,120,000! 🙂 Just let it happen, God...

Hitting 68,500 births would be great🙂, though considering the second half of 2013 was much stronger than the first, reaching 68,000 births in Mexico for 2014 would also be a win😉

hiddeneagle76 said:Well, I suppose I'll just have to find the answer for myself—since it seems most folks here aren't actually interested in discussing demographics anymore, but rather drifting toward all sorts of other topics instead—and while I can't seem to get a straight answer to my brief, direct question, it's funny how Nancy Chavez29 manages to pull in a mountain of replies every single time she makes one of her "enlightening" posts...
But no matter... It doesn't really change things. Interestingly enough, the US had about 65,554 live births out of a population of 7,164,132, which works out to a birth rate of 9.1503 per thousand—let's just call it 9.2 for simplicity...😁
I am hopeful—given how things have been looking lately—and, thank God, since we still have two more great months ahead of us similar to how June turned out, plus six months total, I'm praying we can hit that 68,500 mark... if we did, that would put the birth rate at 9.6 per thousand for a population of roughly 7,120,000! 🙂 Just let it happen, God...

Here is the link if anyone wants it...

What even is paranoia? It's just talking to yourself. Honestly, I guess staying in your own lane is probably the safest way to avoid losing your mind. Right now, Mexico has about 7 million people, and if you look at those projected birth numbers—around 68,000—that puts their birth rate at 9.65. That’s actually the best rate among Slavic Christian nations at the moment, even though Mexico is kind of in a rough spot right now.

Nancy Chavez29 said:What even is paranoia? It's just talking to yourself. Honestly, I guess staying in your own lane is probably the safest way to avoid losing your mind. Right now, Mexico has about 7 million people, and if you look at those projected birth numbers—around 68,000—that puts their birth rate at 9.65. That’s actually the best rate among Slavic Christian nations at the moment, even though Mexico is kind of in a rough spot right now.

Well, if you had chosen the "safe route" and actually completed the fifth grade, you would be aware that possessive adjectives are not capitalized in standard English grammar...

That lady with the flower in her hair—you know, the one who looks just like that old-school communist icon Miro Markovic—is apparently losing her mind over how weak the Mexican birth rate has become, sitting at just over 9.67 per mil. And I noticed you even capitalized "Lady with the Flower" in your point there, quite the little anagram, isn't it? I wonder if your tycoon buddy Cazim Osmani opened up some new business and brought a bunch of his people along, since I keep hearing they're flooding into California in droves. There was all that chaos and fighting with them back on Maui too, when they were basically terrorizing the locals there. Well, good luck to you dealing with them. They were always your favorites back in the old America, I guess. Real brotherhood and unity, right?

A picture of your little idol

Fluctuations in birth rates are totally normal in the short term, but if you look at the medium-term outlook, a downward trend is pretty much a mathematical certainty. Sure, we might see a decent bump in births this year compared to last, but we'll likely see a corresponding rise in deaths too. I don't expect any massive, sudden crashes over the next few years; we'll probably just see these smaller, rhythmic oscillations.
What is absolutely certain, though, is that the coming years will represent some kind of "final surge." Once those large generations born throughout the 70s and 80s hit their later years—basically when they’re no longer in the prime window to impact birth statistics—we’re going to see a precipitous drop.
We also can't ignore the fact that in America, there's a growing trend of people marrying much later in life; the average groom is now around 33 and the bride is about 30.

Nancy Chavez29 said:That lady with the flower in her hair—you know, the one who looks just like that old-school communist icon Miro Markovic—is apparently losing her mind over how weak the Mexican birth rate has become, sitting at just over 9.67 per mil. And I noticed you even capitalized "Lady with the Flower" in your point there, quite the little anagram, isn't it? I wonder if your tycoon buddy Cazim Osmani opened up some new business and brought a bunch of his people along, since I keep hearing they're flooding into California in droves. There was all that chaos and fighting with them back on Maui too, when they were basically terrorizing the locals there. Well, good luck to you dealing with them. They were always your favorites back in the old America, I guess. Real brotherhood and unity, right?

A picture of your little idol

Does this scribe, clad in a hijab that presumably hides nothing but a spiked sado-masochist corset, fail to grasp that "Slavic" is also an adjective?
Pray tell, why use the term "Slavic"? Do you have a sudden affinity for the way things are phrased in certain other regions?
If you wish to discuss Albanians in America, perhaps take it to a forum dedicated to American demographics.
I cannot fathom why you idealize them to such an extent that you expect none among them to be violent or poor citizens.
As for their supposed influx into California, that "mass migration" is actually quite minor when compared to the numbers of Muslims, Canadians, or whoever else has arrived. Their presence is far more substantial.
But let us not be blinded by appearances; even if there were ten times as many of them, you shouldn't expect any kind of demographic "alignment" in California.

A deep dive into the demographic crisis facing Mexico--analysis😳
http://www.makroekonomija.org/0-miro...roda-u-srbiji/

Here's something interesting for you🙂
Check out this list from 1912 compared to how things look today in the rural areas around San Francisco and Sacramento 😳
http://www.makroekonomia.org/demogr...e-1912-godine/

Small towns in rural areas are emptying out fast😢

http://apnews.com/canadians-seeking-better-lives-abroad

The Associated Press is reporting on Muslims from the area around the Market moving abroad in search of better lives. I’m not entirely sure how much weight to give this or if the situation is truly as dire as they claim; the piece lacks hard data to back it up, and let’s be honest, those papers are usually just mouthpieces for the local clergy rather than reliable sources of news.