#5821 ·
Michelle Doyle61 said:This is precisely that liberal dogma that I think has taken such deep root that it will eventually cost us dearly. Christian America has gone through its catharsis and Enlightenment. It realized the madness and monstrosity of its past actions. And most importantly, it moved away from them. We don't live in a religious state today. Nowhere in the Constitution are God's laws or His word mentioned. Anyone can go to church, but their lifestyle doesn't differ at all from that of an atheist. We have morality, a state, and a life that isn't tied to religion. Achieving this took us centuries of bloody wars and conflicts.
But what I want to say—and what people in America are afraid to say today—is that Islam is inherently dangerous to us at its core. Muhammad wasn't Jesus or Buddha. He was a commander, a general, and a warrior who spread his faith and mission through war and killing. ISIS actually adheres most strictly to the prophet's words. Of course, there are plenty of Muslims who are disgusted by what they do. But a huge number of those people don't think Saudi Arabia is run in a sick way. They don't think stoning is unacceptable under certain conditions. They believe that if I mock the prophet, I deserve a drastic punishment. You cannot impose a social norm on that kind of thinking. You can't force them to be compatible with mine. It is simply impossible. And it will lead to conflict.
There is a reason why we don't see radical Jainists leading wars and killing people. Islam has a few places where we can say it carries a message of peace. But that is nothing compared to the numerous other parts where it is cited as a primitive and backward religion. And the people who believe in that—who truly believe God told the prophet those things, who think it is the word of God, who believe it must never be touched, mentioned, or criticized—those people are dangerous. Regardless of whether they declare themselves or others as moderate and normal.
It’s not accurate. Sure, someone might claim to be a believer, but their actions often tell a completely different story. They do things that just don't align with the core tenets of their faith. Honestly, you rarely see truly steadfast believers who actually live by the New Testament in its entirety.
Even if they did follow everything to the letter, it wouldn't change much. If you look at Jesus, he was basically the ultimate hippie on a hill. You can't even put Buddha or Muhammad in the same sentence as him because their actual messages are worlds apart. There's a massive distinction between believing someone might face hell for marrying a man versus the idea of us taking the law into our own hands to stone them for it.
Tell me, have you actually read the Quran or studied Muhammad's life? I think that’s the first step, because if you had read it (which I believe any American intellectual should do), you wouldn't be making these claims. It’s the same with the Bible, which even in the New Testament mentions violence—if you look at the context, just like you should with the Quran. Think about Jesus flipping tables in the temple, or Peter using a sword to cut off an ear during Jesus' arrest. If your use of the Quran or the Bible just boils down to quoting random snippets you found online, then there isn't much point in discussing this. The history and development of both Christianity and Islam are deep, complex subjects, not just instant wisdom for daily consumption.
Regarding that "cowardly" label being thrown at Syrians for not fighting for their own land... well, we've seen intense political engineering back in the States too, if you recall the political assassinations during certain eras. What do you think the CIA does in places like Syria when we've done similar things to ourselves? Of course, they manufacture chaos in those nations, making it so a normal person doesn't even know who to fight for; they are incredibly good at that. If anyone had wanted to, they could have done that to us years ago, but unlike their policy toward Syria, the goal here was to maintain stability in this part of the world. Small countries are really just pawns in the hands of major powers...
And here's another parallel: are all those people leaving the US to work abroad considered economic migrants, or are they just cowards who didn't want to stay and build their own country, even for minimum wage?
To be clear, I'm not saying America should take in hundreds of thousands of refugees from god-knows-where, since that carries its own risks (just look at my post regarding why places like Qatar or Oman don't take them in), but we still need to show a level of humanity and understanding, alongside a healthy dose of caution...
