CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › War in Ukraine › Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5

Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5

Started by Charles Ross3 · · 👁 368 views · 9.2K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Charles Ross3rowdytiger13electrichawk94nimblemoose2Noah Ward2George Robinson43Larry Wilson25Larry Walker24Amanda Allen4Noah Sanchez2Paul Thomas46Jessica Peterson2Nancy Gomez26Nathan Evans78William Anderson5electricsurfer47gentlestag15wiredseal7Thomas Nelson25Donna Harris11Nicholas WatsonJack Kelly5Carol Johnson21Kate Cook27 …
analogbear5 analogbear5 Regular
571 messages
joined Aug 2019
#1901 ·
Amy Rogers6 said:So you're actually suggesting India and China just stopped buying Russian oil? And then magically stopped flipping it on the market to places like the European Union? As long as the G7 isn't the only game in town, no amount of sanctions is going to kill Russia's energy profits... It’s like you guys can't count higher than your own fingers. Cheering and wishful thinking are one thing, but reality and basic logic are something else entirely....☕

The G7 is basically just a sideshow meant to distract Western investors and their dollars.

What’s actually been achieved here besides a bunch of "memorandums of understanding"? There's plenty of planning, plenty of "we would like to," and plenty of "it could be," but zero actual deals.

Take China, for instance—they want to turn the G7 into a customs union. Why do you think that is? And how do the other countries feel about it? None of these member states even have a basic trade agreement in place. Russia and India are openly against it.

Russia is pushing hardest for a common currency to drive de-dollarization, but they’ve got the least to lose in that scenario. China is okay with the idea in principle, but they're being cautious—moving too fast would spike trade costs, make it harder to raise capital outside the G7, and tank their manufacturing competitiveness.

Once we see the first real bilateral deal, or an actual uptick in trade and investment between these countries, then maybe we'll have something worth talking about.
Steven Kim35 Steven Kim35 Member
16 messages
joined Jun 2022
#1902 ·
I’ve been weighing a specific scenario lately. What if the Ukrainians simply let go of Crimea and the Donbas? If they called a truce now and let Russia step back, the war would finally be over. Ukraine could focus on rebuilding and actual development. Then, in thirty years, once they're strong enough, they can decide to take it all back on their own terms.
Bryan Taylor6 Bryan Taylor6 Active Member
179 messages
joined Oct 2017
#1903 ·
Steven Kim35 said:I’ve been weighing a specific scenario lately. What if the Ukrainians simply let go of Crimea and the Donbas? If they called a truce now and let Russia step back, the war would finally be over. Ukraine could focus on rebuilding and actual development. Then, in thirty years, once they're strong enough, they can decide to take it all back on their own terms.

It’s the exact same thing happening in Ukraine right now. Things were looking up, and then someone decided it couldn't work that way...
brighthound13 brighthound13 Member
23 messages
joined Jun 2022
#1904 ·
rowdytiger13 said:Here’s what an actual professional had to say about this topic:
The USA will come out on top. They'll be the ones selling the weapons and the fuel.
China and India win too. They'll pick up energy from Russia at deeply discounted rates.
Europe is basically screwed.
Russia played a massive strategic masterstroke.

I don't see any discounted energy being available anytime soon, especially when you consider how even Saudi Arabia is coordinating oil production and exports alongside Russia. Take Canada, for example; they're essentially seen as a domestic producer for the USA, yet the US keeps them right at a break-even point or maybe just a tiny bit ahead. Plus, those British and Norwegian fields in the North Sea are winding down, and major exporters like Malaysia or Indonesia aren't really in that same position anymore.
It makes me wonder, though, how all this energy exchange is actually going to work, and what kind of currency or goods will be used to pay for it all?
Christian Torres3 Christian Torres3 Regular
604 messages
joined Sep 2014
#1905 ·
brighthound13 said:I don't see any discounted energy being available anytime soon, especially when you consider how even Saudi Arabia is coordinating oil production and exports alongside Russia. Take Canada, for example; they're essentially seen as a domestic producer for the USA, yet the US keeps them right at a break-even point or maybe just a tiny bit ahead. Plus, those British and Norwegian fields in the North Sea are winding down, and major exporters like Malaysia or Indonesia aren't really in that same position anymore.
It makes me wonder, though, how all this energy exchange is actually going to work, and what kind of currency or goods will be used to pay for it all?

Do yourself a favor and Google a list of major oil exporters so you don't embarrass yourself with such stupid takes.
Nancy Gomez26 Nancy Gomez26 Regular
787 messages
joined Jan 2018
#1906 ·
rowdytiger13 said:By the way, I think the combination of maintaining and rebuilding all those occupied territories, paired with heavy sanctions, is going to absolutely bury Russia.
+ Plus, they’ll always have to deal with guerrilla movements and sabotage in those areas (and honestly, it might even happen on their own soil). The Ukrainians are already trained up and ready for exactly that kind of fight.
Russia has dug itself into a massive hole... China is just going to snap them up like a bargain at an auction.

The Russian Federation isn't actually going to rebuild anything in occupied zones, because they won't get official recognition of those lands as theirs. Perhaps only Belarus might eventually acknowledge them as part of the RF—and honestly, I wouldn't bet on them either.
Amy Rogers6 Amy Rogers6 Active Member
69 messages
joined Feb 2021
#1907 ·

rowdytiger13 said:Germany is essentially bracing for a recession, and doing so with a fair amount of discipline. I suspect they'll handle the fallout better than we will, attempting to soften the blow however possible—even the Greens are backing down, and there's even talk of returning to coal.
It’s going to be ugly, but Europe will pull through. Ukraine will bury Russia.

Do you actually think Russia just woke up one morning in 2022 and decided to invade Ukraine on a whim? Please. This war didn't just happen overnight—it was being cooked up for at least five years. They knew exactly what they were doing, and they absolutely expected the West to push back. Just look at how they've pivoted their entire geopolitical and economic strategy in response. That’s the reality right there.

Russia benefits from dragging this conflict out into the winter—the longer the war lasts, the better (well, not *too* long, because a multi-year grind would eventually wreck them too). Their play here is to snap the weakest link in the Western bloc—specifically the EU—as they see it as the fastest route toward a multipolar world, which is one of their main goals. The thing is, it looks like Russia has started playing the "controlled chaos" game just like the Anglo-Saxons. But history has proven a thousand times over that chaos is a fickle beast; you can never fully control it. Look at Hitler—the Allies basically had more luck than sense early on, which kept that chaos from blowing up in their own faces. And let’s be real: the Germans have historically been some of the biggest geopolitical idiots in civilization, which is clearly still true today. Honestly, that just adds a massive stroke of luck to the equation.

I mean, I could see it happening where China ends up buying into the stock market—and I'm not just talking about Russian assets here. That whole process is pretty much a foregone conclusion. The only thing that can actually stop them is the USA, and they’d have to do it through a direct war that they absolutely HAVE to win. And let's be real, that's no walk in the park.

When it comes to Germans—they’ve always been clueless, and honestly, they haven't changed. They have such massive complexes; sometimes I feel like they’re even worse than the Russians, whose unstoppable geopolitical screw-ups don't seem to slow them down one bit. They’re just fundamentally limited when it comes to global strategy.

So you're saying the German messed up? 😁 They didn't screw up; they were just dreaming of a massive Eurasian powerhouse—different from Russia, sure—where they’d call all the shots using their tech and industrial muscle, fueled by cheap Russian energy. Honestly, there’s no mistake here; it’s pure, cold calculation. And it’s nothing new, either. They choked twice during the war, and now they think they can just slide back in through the economic backdoor? Yeah, not gonna happen. Not when they're simultaneously trying to grab a leash on Europe and making another play for the Middle East at the same time.

I'll tell you exactly how this winter in Germany is going to look if this war drags into 2023. There are really only two ways this plays out: either Germany ends up on its knees begging for any solution they can find while their society starts radicalizing, or they pivot their remaining resources into the defense industry to gear up for a new Eastern Front. That’s it. There is no third option. Everything else they're yapping about is just empty rhetoric that's going to get swept away by pure energy logic.

Why do you think Germans are praying for this war to end ASAP? They’re honestly ready to let Russia just steamroll Ukrainians if it means getting their power back on full blast. They couldn't care less about what happens to Ukraine—as far as they're concerned, they can be wiped off the map if it means the energy keeps flowing.

The Anglos are just playing the long game with Ukraine—they just need them to hold out for another four or five years. Honestly, whether they actually win the war or not isn't even their main concern. The real goal? Bleed Russia dry. If they can exhaust them now, it opens up a clear path to target China later, who would be left completely isolated and way easier to take down.

Ukrainians only have their grit to rely on at this point. Honestly, I’m pulling for them and hope they pull through—though it’s gonna be a hell of a fight. That psycho leader just gave a speech for the G7 that basically screams he isn't stopping until he hits total occupation. But let's be real: he probably only has a year left. Russia doesn't have the economic stamina to keep grinding like this without destroying themselves in the process. And by "destroying themselves," I don't mean people or equipment—we all know that guy doesn't count human lives or hardware as actual losses.

Bottom line: at this rate—especially if the energy crisis keeps spiraling (which, let’s face it, is totally on the table)—the EU is going to tank and vanish from the geopolitical map entirely. And honestly? That's the least of our worries. I'm not even going to bring up those failed solutions or all the other agendas they forced through back in 2019...

That's just the cold, hard geopolitical reality. Everything else is either blind cheerleading (which I get) or just loud, obnoxious nonsense, and frankly, I'm sick of hearing it.☕
brighthound13 brighthound13 Member
23 messages
joined Jun 2022
#1908 ·
Nancy Gomez26 said:The Russian Federation isn't actually going to rebuild anything in occupied zones, because they won't get official recognition of those lands as theirs. Perhaps only Belarus might eventually acknowledge them as part of the RF—and honestly, I wouldn't bet on them either.

But why would Russia care about who recognizes what anyway? Isn't it true that you effectively own whatever ground your military is currently standing on?
Christian Torres3 Christian Torres3 Regular
604 messages
joined Sep 2014
#1909 ·
Amy Rogers6 said:Do you actually think Russia just woke up one morning in 2022 and decided to invade Ukraine on a whim? Please. This war didn't just happen overnight—it was being cooked up for at least five years. They knew exactly what they were doing, and they absolutely expected the West to push back. Just look at how they've pivoted their entire geopolitical and economic strategy in response. That’s the reality right there.

Russia benefits from dragging this conflict out into the winter—the longer the war lasts, the better (well, not *too* long, because a multi-year grind would eventually wreck them too). Their play here is to snap the weakest link in the Western bloc—specifically the EU—as they see it as the fastest route toward a multipolar world, which is one of their main goals. The thing is, it looks like Russia has started playing the "controlled chaos" game just like the Anglo-Saxons. But history has proven a thousand times over that chaos is a fickle beast; you can never fully control it. Look at Hitler—the Allies basically had more luck than sense early on, which kept that chaos from blowing up in their own faces. And let’s be real: the Germans have historically been some of the biggest geopolitical idiots in civilization, which is clearly still true today. Honestly, that just adds a massive stroke of luck to the equation.

I mean, I could see it happening where China ends up buying into the stock market—and I'm not just talking about Russian assets here. That whole process is pretty much a foregone conclusion. The only thing that can actually stop them is the USA, and they’d have to do it through a direct war that they absolutely HAVE to win. And let's be real, that's no walk in the park.

When it comes to Germans—they’ve always been clueless, and honestly, they haven't changed. They have such massive complexes; sometimes I feel like they’re even worse than the Russians, whose unstoppable geopolitical screw-ups don't seem to slow them down one bit. They’re just fundamentally limited when it comes to global strategy.

So you're saying the German messed up? 😁 They didn't screw up; they were just dreaming of a massive Eurasian powerhouse—different from Russia, sure—where they’d call all the shots using their tech and industrial muscle, fueled by cheap Russian energy. Honestly, there’s no mistake here; it’s pure, cold calculation. And it’s nothing new, either. They choked twice during the war, and now they think they can just slide back in through the economic backdoor? Yeah, not gonna happen. Not when they're simultaneously trying to grab a leash on Europe and making another play for the Middle East at the same time.

I'll tell you exactly how this winter in Germany is going to look if this war drags into 2023. There are really only two ways this plays out: either Germany ends up on its knees begging for any solution they can find while their society starts radicalizing, or they pivot their remaining resources into the defense industry to gear up for a new Eastern Front. That’s it. There is no third option. Everything else they're yapping about is just empty rhetoric that's going to get swept away by pure energy logic.

Why do you think Germans are praying for this war to end ASAP? They’re honestly ready to let Russia just steamroll Ukrainians if it means getting their power back on full blast. They couldn't care less about what happens to Ukraine—as far as they're concerned, they can be wiped off the map if it means the energy keeps flowing.

The Anglos are just playing the long game with Ukraine—they just need them to hold out for another four or five years. Honestly, whether they actually win the war or not isn't even their main concern. The real goal? Bleed Russia dry. If they can exhaust them now, it opens up a clear path to target China later, who would be left completely isolated and way easier to take down.

Ukrainians only have their grit to rely on at this point. Honestly, I’m pulling for them and hope they pull through—though it’s gonna be a hell of a fight. That psycho leader just gave a speech for the G7 that basically screams he isn't stopping until he hits total occupation. But let's be real: he probably only has a year left. Russia doesn't have the economic stamina to keep grinding like this without destroying themselves in the process. And by "destroying themselves," I don't mean people or equipment—we all know that guy doesn't count human lives or hardware as actual losses.

Bottom line: at this rate—especially if the energy crisis keeps spiraling (which, let’s face it, is totally on the table)—the EU is going to tank and vanish from the geopolitical map entirely. And honestly? That's the least of our worries. I'm not even going to bring up those failed solutions or all the other agendas they forced through back in 2019...

That's just the cold, hard geopolitical reality. Everything else is either blind cheerleading (which I get) or just loud, obnoxious nonsense, and frankly, I'm sick of hearing it.☕

Russia wasn't getting ready for this kind of scenario. From your very first sentence, your premise is totally wrong. This isn't "reality," it's just a bunch of wishful thinking from a movie you aren't even watching.
Amy Rogers6 Amy Rogers6 Active Member
69 messages
joined Feb 2021
#1910 ·
"Quote:"
rowdytiger13 said:Here’s what an actual professional had to say about this topic:
The USA will come out on top. They'll be the ones selling the weapons and the fuel.
China and India win too. They'll pick up energy from Russia at deeply discounted rates.
Europe is basically screwed.
Russia played a massive strategic masterstroke.

I’m with most of you on this one—except for two things. If the USA actually wants to turn a real profit and hit its targets, it has to take down China. It’s just a necessity at this point. Honestly, it’ll probably all boil over once things get messy around Taiwan; you don't exactly need to be a genius to see that coming.

Russia won't lose if the EU manages to commit suicide over the next year—especially since disco prices were actually better than the regular ones before the conflict kicked off. 😁All they'll end up doing is handing their cash straight over to some Chinese conglomerate. That's how this goes.☕

The EU is basically a walking suicide mission at this point. They’re gonna throw anyone under the bus just to wrap up this war in Ukraine if it drags on past 2023.
Nancy Gomez26 Nancy Gomez26 Regular
787 messages
joined Jan 2018
#1911 ·
Melissa Rivera5 said:I mean, I’m just wondering... how are we ever supposed to trust Russia again? Like, let's say they actually sign a ceasefire tomorrow and the war finally ends. Who, or even what, would act as the guarantor to make sure history doesn't just repeat itself?

Full membership in NATO, where every single member commits at least 2% of their budget to defense. Or perhaps some sort of unified European Union military force. The only real guarantee is investing heavily in your own security. Once you do that, everyone might finally get along. And then we can stop wondering who is actually trying to tear us apart...
analogbear5 analogbear5 Regular
571 messages
joined Aug 2019
#1912 ·
People on this sub are all saying Europe is screwed because they’re gonna have to dump way more money into their own defense.

If only it were that simple.
brighthound13 brighthound13 Member
23 messages
joined Jun 2022
#1913 ·
Christian Torres3 said:Do yourself a favor and Google a list of major oil exporters so you don't embarrass yourself with such stupid takes.

Honestly, I can just walk past any gas station and see the reality for myself, isn't it obvious? Our demand for energy is only ever going up, while we actually hit our peak production levels—including uranium—quite a long time ago.
gentlerider7 gentlerider7 Regular
291 messages
joined Jan 2021
#1914 ·
Christian Torres3 said:

Russia wasn't getting ready for this kind of scenario. From your very first sentence, your premise is totally wrong. This isn't "reality," it's just a bunch of wishful thinking from a movie you aren't even watching.
Russia wasn't getting ready for this kind of scenario. From your very first sentence, your premise is totally wrong. This isn't "reality," it's just a bunch of wishful thinking from a movie you aren't even watching.
Look, it was obvious from everything Putin was blathering about at the start of the war, and honestly, you can see it in how jittery and unhinged the Russian leadership has been acting lately. If the Russ were actually playing this cool, calculated game with a master plan and clear intentions, wouldn't we be seeing that? It would be obvious, right? Instead, it's just chaos.

I mean, let's be real, on a forum like this, all you have to do is drop some pseudo-intellectual nonsense, throw in a phrase like "that's just the reality of the situation," and maybe toss in a coffee emoji, and suddenly everyone thinks you're some kind of high-level geopolitical expert...
Nancy Gomez26 Nancy Gomez26 Regular
787 messages
joined Jan 2018
#1915 ·
Amy Rogers6 said:Do you actually think Russia just woke up one morning in 2022 and decided to invade Ukraine on a whim? Please. This war didn't just happen overnight—it was being cooked up for at least five years. They knew exactly what they were doing, and they absolutely expected the West to push back. Just look at how they've pivoted their entire geopolitical and economic strategy in response. That’s the reality right there.

Russia benefits from dragging this conflict out into the winter—the longer the war lasts, the better (well, not *too* long, because a multi-year grind would eventually wreck them too). Their play here is to snap the weakest link in the Western bloc—specifically the EU—as they see it as the fastest route toward a multipolar world, which is one of their main goals. The thing is, it looks like Russia has started playing the "controlled chaos" game just like the Anglo-Saxons. But history has proven a thousand times over that chaos is a fickle beast; you can never fully control it. Look at Hitler—the Allies basically had more luck than sense early on, which kept that chaos from blowing up in their own faces. And let’s be real: the Germans have historically been some of the biggest geopolitical idiots in civilization, which is clearly still true today. Honestly, that just adds a massive stroke of luck to the equation.

I mean, I could see it happening where China ends up buying into the stock market—and I'm not just talking about Russian assets here. That whole process is pretty much a foregone conclusion. The only thing that can actually stop them is the USA, and they’d have to do it through a direct war that they absolutely HAVE to win. And let's be real, that's no walk in the park.

When it comes to Germans—they’ve always been clueless, and honestly, they haven't changed. They have such massive complexes; sometimes I feel like they’re even worse than the Russians, whose unstoppable geopolitical screw-ups don't seem to slow them down one bit. They’re just fundamentally limited when it comes to global strategy.

So you're saying the German messed up? 😁 They didn't screw up; they were just dreaming of a massive Eurasian powerhouse—different from Russia, sure—where they’d call all the shots using their tech and industrial muscle, fueled by cheap Russian energy. Honestly, there’s no mistake here; it’s pure, cold calculation. And it’s nothing new, either. They choked twice during the war, and now they think they can just slide back in through the economic backdoor? Yeah, not gonna happen. Not when they're simultaneously trying to grab a leash on Europe and making another play for the Middle East at the same time.

I'll tell you exactly how this winter in Germany is going to look if this war drags into 2023. There are really only two ways this plays out: either Germany ends up on its knees begging for any solution they can find while their society starts radicalizing, or they pivot their remaining resources into the defense industry to gear up for a new Eastern Front. That’s it. There is no third option. Everything else they're yapping about is just empty rhetoric that's going to get swept away by pure energy logic.

Why do you think Germans are praying for this war to end ASAP? They’re honestly ready to let Russia just steamroll Ukrainians if it means getting their power back on full blast. They couldn't care less about what happens to Ukraine—as far as they're concerned, they can be wiped off the map if it means the energy keeps flowing.

The Anglos are just playing the long game with Ukraine—they just need them to hold out for another four or five years. Honestly, whether they actually win the war or not isn't even their main concern. The real goal? Bleed Russia dry. If they can exhaust them now, it opens up a clear path to target China later, who would be left completely isolated and way easier to take down.

Ukrainians only have their grit to rely on at this point. Honestly, I’m pulling for them and hope they pull through—though it’s gonna be a hell of a fight. That psycho leader just gave a speech for the G7 that basically screams he isn't stopping until he hits total occupation. But let's be real: he probably only has a year left. Russia doesn't have the economic stamina to keep grinding like this without destroying themselves in the process. And by "destroying themselves," I don't mean people or equipment—we all know that guy doesn't count human lives or hardware as actual losses.

Bottom line: at this rate—especially if the energy crisis keeps spiraling (which, let’s face it, is totally on the table)—the EU is going to tank and vanish from the geopolitical map entirely. And honestly? That's the least of our worries. I'm not even going to bring up those failed solutions or all the other agendas they forced through back in 2019...

That's just the cold, hard geopolitical reality. Everything else is either blind cheerleading (which I get) or just loud, obnoxious nonsense, and frankly, I'm sick of hearing it.☕

I stopped reading there. If they spent all that time preparing, only to roll into a full-scale conflict using truck tires that might as well be made of cardboard, then all that planning was a complete waste of breath. One could write entire volumes on how "preparation" (if such a thing even existed) was fundamentally flawed, but this point alone is more than enough.
Amanda Allen4 Amanda Allen4 Active Member
238 messages
joined Feb 2013
#1916 ·
analogbear5 said:People on this sub are all saying Europe is screwed because they’re gonna have to dump way more money into their own defense.

If only it were that simple.

The reality? The European Union is actually resentful of the alliance with the USA—and those pushing for change are primarily motivated by one thing: tearing that alliance apart.

It’s a classic "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" combat strategy.
Amy Rogers6 Amy Rogers6 Active Member
69 messages
joined Feb 2021
#1917 ·
Christian Torres3 said:

Russia wasn't getting ready for this kind of scenario. From your very first sentence, your premise is totally wrong. This isn't "reality," it's just a bunch of wishful thinking from a movie you aren't even watching.
Russia wasn't getting ready for this kind of scenario. From your very first sentence, your premise is totally wrong. This isn't "reality," it's just a bunch of wishful thinking from a movie you aren't even watching.
First off, don't go projecting some pro-Russia bias onto me—you know that’s not my vibe, especially after everything regarding Syria. Just because I’m not an Anglophile and can’t stand them either is your problem, not mine...

Secondly—sure, the Russians couldn't have known every single tool that would be used against them, but they definitely knew they'd get hit on energy flows. That means both financially and technologically (especially when we're talking about the chips needed for the defense industry). Even a kid could see that—which is why they prepared. What points to that conclusion? The fact that they secured their energy supply right before the invasion through deals with India and China (just look at Lavrov’s visits—where was he hanging out or who was he meeting with for at least a year leading up to the invasion)?

Plus, it's obvious they stockpiled enough Western tech before the invasion, because there's no way in hell the Russians could be shelling Ukraine like this otherwise—and don't even get me started on how they handled the ruble and the payment systems...

Do you honestly believe the "brilliant" Kremlin cooked all of this up in a month once the invasion started? Because if you do, you're just a Putin fanboy believing in his superpowers... I don't see any other explanation...☕

If they weren't ready, Russia would be on its knees economically right now, begging for negotiations...
Nathan Thomas12 Nathan Thomas12 Regular
265 messages
joined Apr 2022
#1918 ·
Tyler Bennett73 said:Man, I still remember how the European Union and the USA were feeding us this whole fairy tale when those first sanction packages dropped—telling us Russia would be completely broke by mid-April. Well, guess what? It’s already been seven months, and the Ruble is sitting there looking stronger than ever while the Euro is basically in a death spiral. Look, I'm not saying sanctions won't do *anything*, but they're definitely going to trigger some massive backlashes. The real question is: how much is the European Union actually going to take the hit for all this? Right now, we're just seeing the winners rake it in: China, the USA, India, Turkey. Pretty soon, politicians are gonna have to deal with people losing their minds over shrinking wallets—and honestly, who knows? We might even see another "random" pandemic pop up this winter, just "coincidentally" appearing right when things get messy.

The Ruble is worthless. You could have a billion rubles stuffed in your sock and you wouldn't even be able to buy a stick of gum—and if you tried to use it in Russia, nobody's going to swap it for dollars or euros for you.
Amy Rogers6 Amy Rogers6 Active Member
69 messages
joined Feb 2021
#1919 ·
Nancy Gomez26 said:

I stopped reading there. If they spent all that time preparing, only to roll into a full-scale conflict using truck tires that might as well be made of cardboard, then all that planning was a complete waste of breath. One could write entire volumes on how "preparation" (if such a thing even existed) was fundamentally flawed, but this point alone is more than enough.
I stopped reading there. If they spent all that time preparing, only to roll into a full-scale conflict using truck tires that might as well be made of cardboard, then all that planning was a complete waste of breath. One could write entire volumes on how "preparation" (if such a thing even existed) was fundamentally flawed, but this point alone is more than enough.
Come on, name me one single Russian war in history where they actually showed up prepared.
Christian Torres3 Christian Torres3 Regular
604 messages
joined Sep 2014
#1920 ·
gentlerider7 said:Russia wasn't getting ready for this kind of scenario. From your very first sentence, your premise is totally wrong. This isn't "reality," it's just a bunch of wishful thinking from a movie you aren't even watching.

Look, it was obvious from everything Putin was blathering about at the start of the war, and honestly, you can see it in how jittery and unhinged the Russian leadership has been acting lately. If the Russ were actually playing this cool, calculated game with a master plan and clear intentions, wouldn't we be seeing that? It would be obvious, right? Instead, it's just chaos.

I mean, let's be real, on a forum like this, all you have to do is drop some pseudo-intellectual nonsense, throw in a phrase like "that's just the reality of the situation," and maybe toss in a coffee emoji, and suddenly everyone thinks you're some kind of high-level geopolitical expert...
Meh, our buddy here just drives past gas stations and suddenly he's an expert on global economics.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads