363 posts shown.
Richard Carter59 said:Terminator 2 - Robert Patrick ( http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001598/ )
Snatch - the main guy... can't quite put a finger on the name... http://gfx.filmweb.pl/p/9554/po.114381.jpg
And so on... there are plenty more... 😬
placidcrane61 said:Are those "The Satanic Verses" actually referring to specific parts of the Quran?
And if they are, which parts exactly?
frozenfox13 said:🙂 An insult isn't something you can just take back. It's like if someone told you that you could always go back to that old academy you attended.
(Man, I think it is reversible. I guess the Quran provides plenty of ammunition for preemptive strikes against Islam, considering it seems to consist of nothing more than theological cultural genocide and intellectual looting... though I suppose you could also call it a call for genocide or something similar... whatever works for you...)
Convert me or die!
Walter Rogers3 said:🤣 🤣 🤣
Iranian equals Indian equals Native American; it is all one and the same...🤣 🤣
Richard Wilson4 said:Just Singapore?
What about Panama, Nicaragua, Honduras, or Costa Rica?
Dennis Carter said:Hahaha, yeah, I totally caught that too, lol.
Such an awesome movie—the vibes are just spot on.
analogseal39 said:plus there are just thousands of these tiny, hilarious little details... like:
when they're practicing driving stakes into pillows and then Alfred smacks his finger with a hammer; then in the next shot, you see the old guy coming down the stairs with his finger all wrapped up in bandages...
or
that part where they're eating at the tavern and the old man breaks off a chunk of cheese, but a little piece snaps off and hits the table, so he just keeps stabbing at it with his fork (or maybe a knife?) until he finally gets it...
The movie is bloody... totally wild, funny, and just feels like a dark fairy tale...
analogseal39 said:... or basically: vampire!!!
"Exactly one year ago tonight, we were all right here in this very room.
Me, your pastor, and all of you—my dear congregation. I had so much hope in my heart back then,
when I promised you that with a little help from Lucifer, we’d be looking forward to a much more delicious occasion.
Just think back for a second. We were all sitting there, feeling pretty miserable and depressed,
huddled up around that one pathetic little woodcutter..."
ambersailor51 said:And who even counts as part of the hardcore crowd? Just a few thousand preachers or just the guys at the drag strip?? ☕
Chloe Garcia98 said:Just look at these self-righteous moralists of ours, weeping crocodile tears while they scramble to defend the reputation of the entire humanitarian organization... They demand links, they plead their case, and they beg for accountability as if they’re anything more than performative😂
But the second the Vatican or the Red Cross gets pulled into the fray, all that nuanced debate goes out the window, replaced by nothing but sweeping, mindless generalizations😵
slypuma17 said:Since you usually have a habit of backing up your posts with links, this particular void feels strangely loud. I’m not suggesting you're lying, but there are plenty of ambiguities in this whole narrative:
1) Did the Red Cross actually have the authority to issue passports, or was that—much like today—an exclusive prerogative of the Department of Homeland Security?
2) Which state issued his passport? Does such a thing as a "Red Cross passport" even exist? For what it's worth, if a passport features a red cross on a white background, we're looking at a Swiss passport, not some specialized "Red Cross" document...
3) Was the passport issued under his actual name, or an alias?
4) If the answer to number three is yes, can we know if the clerk behind the counter had any inkling of who they were dealing with?
And so on, and so forth. Until these elementary details are cleared up,
please refrain from leveling heavy artillery at the International Committee of the Red Cross or its conventions and declarations.
Thanks