Posts by Matthew Hall37
12 posts shown.
My take:
A FRENCH PHILOSOPHER IS SOUNDING THE ALARM:
Greece is basically a test lab for what’s coming for all of Europe, and eventually, the whole US!
We're looking at a society stripped of public services—hospitals and schools turned into literal ruins, healthcare becoming a luxury perk for the ultra-rich, and the most vulnerable people just being phased out of existence. That’s the grim forecast from Badiou.
In an unthinkable twist of tragedy, parents in Greece are actually forced to abandon their children.
Think about this: when every other young person in Greece is unemployed and 250,000 people are wandering the streets of Athens without homes, you end up with thousands of parents having to give their kids up for adoption just so they don't starve or freeze to death. This entire setup nukes the right to work, pushes the poor into absolute destitution, and effectively wipes out the middle class entirely.
Greece is serving as a social laboratory for a contagion that will soon infect all of Europe. We're talking about a world where public services vanish, schools and hospitals crumble, health is a privilege reserved for the wealthy, the vulnerable are systematically liquidated, and anyone lucky enough to still have a job is stuck in a cycle of poverty and constant instability.
Debt is being used as a weapon against society at large.
In this neoliberal blitzkrieg, democracy is treated as an afterthought. Parliaments are basically handing over the keys to bankers and technocrats. Debt isn't just money anymore; it's a weapon used to strike at the heart of the entire population. It’s essentially a class war waged by the finance bros against everyone else, according to his manifesto.
"We are calling on Europeans to speak up loudly and clearly—can we really stay silent while they do this to the Greeks, knowing it’s just the blueprint for everyone else?" Badiou concludes, throwing a massive warning flag toward America, which is starting to look more and more like Greece every single day.
Angela Wright wrote about that book *Chemotherapy Cures Cancer*, and how the world is just a flat plate:
"My honest impression—of someone who clearly did such deep and wide-ranging research, wrote a whole book, and then uses the intro to her show to spout total nonsense about heart cancer not existing, while also claiming doctors failed to explain why cancer doesn't attack the heart ( ), immediately destroys any sense of competence or credibility in my eyes. I didn't even bother watching any further. This guy obviously doesn't grasp basic cancer facts, let alone offer any kind of sensible alternative treatment."
Can you tell me how many people in America actually have heart cancer?
I haven't heard of a single case.
Watch the show and you'll see there's some logic to this story. Unfortunately, everyone reading this post can see that all the sick people are slowly slipping away, which just proves the author's point. Plus, the cost of chemotherapy is unrealistically high and frankly inhumane considering the results. If the price were realistic, the pharmaceutical industry wouldn't be seeing massive profits—well, maybe slightly less than massive. And honestly, making a killing off other people's misery isn't exactly classy.
Look, you can get the shot if you want, but don't expect the manufacturer to guarantee you'll actually make it through the process alive. I just got hit with an email that said this:
"Three girls died, and others ended up in the ER right after getting the HPV vaccine (Gardasil)
Following the rollout of that controversial mandate in the US requiring girls to be vaccinated with Merck's new HPV vaccine, Gardasil, reports of some seriously scary side effects are starting to trickle in.
Judicial Watch has flagged 1,637 adverse reactions, including three cases where young girls passed away shortly after immunization. Judicial Watch managed to get their hands on these reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention using the Freedom of Information Act.
Over in Australia, 25 girls dealt with massive headaches, nausea, and dizziness after being jabbed. In some instances, things got so bad they had to be rushed to the hospital. The stock value for the Australian company CSL took a dive once news of this incident broke.
New England Journal of Medicine, June 9, 2007;334:1182-1183—I checked the source, and you should too.
Dr. Mercola's take:
Should the government really be forcing girls to take Gardasil when the potential fallout includes death and hospitalization? We're also seeing reports from the National Center regarding fainting spells and vertigo, which dozens of patients have reported as side effects of Gardasil. On top of that, there are even whispers that Gardasil might trigger infertility.
That is way too much risk for a single vaccine that only offers intermittent protection against HPV—something that can be avoided entirely without such an expensive and potentially lethal shot.
Please understand that Merck has basically played the medical and political systems to force children into taking this dangerous vaccine just so they can rake in massive profits. Their little bait? The promise of potentially reducing cervical cancer.
Keep in mind, Merck, the maker of this vaccine, is the exact same company that produced Vioxx, which killed over 60,000 people.
It’s also vital to look at the math: this year, about 11,000 women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer caused by HPV, and 3,700 of them will die from it. By comparison, 16 times more women in the US will deal with breast cancer (178,480), and 11 times more will die from it (40,460).
As Merck's own literature points out, it's important to realize that Gardasil doesn't protect women against certain "non-vaccine" types of HPV. So, even if these girls take the risk and get the shot, they could still end up catching HPV anyway.
At the end of the day, even though over 6 million women get infected with HPV every year, a woman's immune system is usually strong enough to handle it on its own. About 90% of HPV infections clear up naturally within two years.
Remember, it isn't just about the infection itself; it's about the human immune system. You're constantly exposed to bacteria and viruses, but if you maintain a healthy lifestyle, your body's defenses can easily shut those infections down.
I did a little digging online, and if you type "gardasil-hpv-death" into a search engine, you'll find a whole rabbit hole of info. Honestly, it feels like our health officials either don't know how to use Google or their kickbacks are so high they're choosing to look the other way.
If you’re over in Cleveland, you can actually grab an Aqua Detox session at the physical therapy clinic over on David Gervais Street. The treatment itself is $43, though they usually suggest doing at least six sessions to really see results, then just popping back in whenever you feel like it.
Check this out
www.positiva.com!
Chlorine is a seriously nasty gas. We're talking about stuff that starts messing with your lungs and eyes at just 3 ppm in the air.
On top of that, the stuff is incredibly corrosive; those vapors will absolutely wreck your eyes and respiratory system. If you hit 15 ppm in the air, your throat is going to be screaming from irritation, and once you reach 50 ppm, you're looking at real danger even if you aren't breathing it in for long. Bottom line? You really need to sit down and actually read the safety data sheet that’s supposed to come with any chlorine shipment delivered to a pool facility. If they haven't provided one, then your bosses are straight-up breaking the law.
Maybe Clinton will have some kind of spiritual awakening, similar to how Clinton did, if he can actually make it through all this chaos. Who knows? Maybe this whole mess will serve as some sort of harsh lesson for the American people—especially the working class, who were promised the moon and stars before he even took office. If God grants him a second chance down the road, maybe he'll finally follow through on those promises.
I honestly have no clue what they actually pump back into the water after the ozonation process, and it’s been bugging me lately. Same goes for what happens right after chlorination. What's the deal there?
Chlorinating drinking water is a century-old trick, so you'd think by now we would have come up with something way more advanced and efficient. I'm all for making sure water treatment in America is done using the absolute best tech available so we can all stop worrying about what's actually coming out of our taps.
If you really want to see what I mean, take a look at cancer rates and how they've shifted over the last seven years—you could look at data from somewhere like Cook County, for example. In a place like San Diego County, you'd see numbers jump from roughly 8,500 new cases back in 2000 to about 10,800 by 2005. If we supposedly have clean water and clean air, why are Americans getting sick at such high rates? Is it just bad food and stress, or is there something deeper going on?
Chlorine is a corrosive gas; its vapors absolutely wreck your eyes and lungs. Just 15 ppm in the air can leave your throat feeling raw, and once you hit 50 ppm, you're looking at serious danger even if you're only exposed for a short burst. So, go ahead, keep boiling massive pots of water in some tiny, cramped kitchen with the windows shut tight. You might think you'll be fine, but I certainly can't guarantee anything for that little pet bird sitting in a cage right next to the stove...
By the way, the very first chemical warfare agents were actually built using that exact same chlorine.
I came across an interesting piece published in the Council of Nicaea, and I pulled this specific excerpt out for you:
"Scientists from the University of Notre Dame recently released a study claiming that swimming and spending time around pools is a significant risk factor for children developing asthma (EHP 2006,114,1567). Beyond convincingly linking childhood asthma to pool environments that are constantly polluted by chlorine degradation byproducts, this study raises other critical concerns. Chief among them is the safety of drinking tap water that undergoes regular chlorination. The process of chlorinating drinking water also creates a whole host of harmful byproducts, even when concentrations remain low..."
Some research suggests that long-term exposure to chlorinated water actually bumps up the risk of bladder and rectal cancer.
Quick question for my colleague feralwolf24: Why do wealthy nations opt for ozone treatment for their drinking water? Are they just trying to poison their own people?
Sorry I'm a little late to the party with this one, but hey, better late than never, right? Ozone. Honestly, where do we even start with this stuff? It’s one of those things that sounds like some high-tech miracle ingredient until you actually look at the science behind it. People love to toss the word around like it’s some kind of magic wand that can fix everything from bad smells to water quality, but let me tell you, it’s a bit more complicated than a late-night infomercial makes it out to be. It’s like when people talk about "organic" food—everyone wants a piece of it because it sounds pure and safe, but if you don't understand the process, you might end up swallowing something you really didn't intend to. Ozone is powerful, sure. It’s an oxidizer. It tears through bacteria and organic matter like a wrecking ball through a drywall partition. In industrial settings or for treating large bodies of water, it's a beast. But then you have people using these little gadgets in their living rooms, thinking they're turning their apartments into a mountain retreat, when in reality, they're just playing with chemistry they don't quite grasp. It's all about balance. Too much of a good thing—even something as fundamental as oxygen molecules being rearranged—and suddenly you've gone from "fresh scent" to "irritating my lungs." It reminds me of how people handle spicy food; a little bit of heat adds flavor, but if you go overboard, you're just sitting there crying and regretting every life choice that led you to that habanero. Use it right, and it's a tool. Use it wrong, and you're just creating a headache. Look, I’m telling you, ozone is a beast. We're talking about an oxidizing power that absolutely smokes chlorine in a head-to-head fight. And the best part? Since it’s basically just pure oxygen, it doesn't leave behind any of those nasty, toxic residues that mess up the environment. It’s clean. Period. Scientific studies have already backed this up—ozone is incredibly efficient at nuking mold spores, viruses, bacteria, and all sorts of other pathogens and organic chemicals. It’s like a microscopic wrecking ball. But here’s the catch: because it’s chemically unstable, it doesn't stick around forever. It’s got a super short "lifespan." Once it hits organic junk, it speeds up its own breakdown process. After it finishes oxidizing everything in sight, it naturally snaps back into regular oxygen. Because of that instability, you can't just bottle it up on a shelf like some canned soda; you have to generate it right there on the spot exactly when you need it. When it goes to work, it destroys bacteria and fungi by literally ripping their cell membranes apart. It breaks down organic compounds into their simplest possible molecules just to get the job done—sterilization through total molecular destruction. Even ozonated water eventually just turns back into plain old water. No poisonous gases, no pollutants, no leftover junk. Just clean.
So, here’s the deal with chlorination: you end up with what they call residual chlorine. Basically, it’s just leftover chlorine that didn't actually get used up fighting off bacteria in the water. The maximum acceptable limit is around 0.5 mg/kg, and from what I’ve seen while testing the water over in Cincinnati, those levels are constantly hitting the absolute ceiling. And let me tell you, that stuff is proven to be garbage for our health. As for the water supply in Washington, D.C., the number of available sources is shrinking because of all the pollution out there. Honestly, who can even guarantee that the water coming out of your tap right now isn't coming from a source that's scheduled to be shut down any day now? It’s sketchy. My advice? Don't just drink it straight. Get yourself a filter—something like a Brita or a Zepter—or if you want to go full DIY, you could even grab a home ozone generator to treat it. Just take care of yourself.
Can we start with the basics? Basically, all drinking water has to be disinfected to keep nasty infections at bay. When it comes to wastewater, there are three main ways to get the job done: chlorination, ozonation, and UV radiation.
A ton of municipal systems across the US rely on chlorination for both drinking and wastewater. But here’s the thing most people don't realize: those organic chlorine chemicals used in the process can actually mess with public health, wreck aquatic life, and just hang around the environment way longer than they should. Because engineers have to balance the need for effective disinfection against the environmental fallout, a lot of water utilities are ditching chlorine for other methods.
Ozonation and UV radiation are two great alternatives because they don't leave any chemical residue behind in the treated water. Ozonation systems have been used for drinking water since the early 1900s, but back in the 1970s, designers here in the US started looking into using ozone for wastewater disinfection too.
To make ozone, these systems use electrical discharge—it’s actually pretty similar to how lightning works during a thunderstorm. Once you've got the ozone, you mix it into the drinking or wastewater to hit that sweet spot of disinfection. As for UV radiation, it works by hitting the wastewater with UV rays that trigger photochemical changes inside the cells of pathogens, basically neutralizing them.
The way UV disinfection works is actually functionally different from chlorination or ozonation. Instead of physically destroying the pathogens, UV radiation just breaks them so badly they lose their ability to reproduce. It's essentially like taking a natural UV process and cranking it up to eleven by concentrating the light intensely.
Generally speaking, UV systems are cheaper to build and run compared to ozonation. While the labor, maintenance, and energy costs for both UV and ozone depend heavily on the water quality you're dealing with, when you crunch the final numbers, UV disinfection usually comes out on top... "
Make sense?
In much wealthier countries compared to ours, they don't just dump chlorine into the drinking water; instead, they treat it with ozone, which costs way more than standard chlorination. What do you guys think the reasoning is behind that?