Betty Bennett10 said:I'm still not totally following: you're saying an abortion is only okay if both the mother's and the baby's lives are at risk—basically, where continuing the pregnancy would kill them both, but ending it saves the mother? (Honestly, I can't even wrap my head around what kind of medical situation that would actually be.)
I guess one example is when a pregnant woman has major heart issues or high blood pressure, and carrying the baby to term—let alone actually giving birth—could literally kill her. I don't know, maybe someone here is actually a doctor and can give a better example.
Betty Bennett10 said:What if a woman gets diagnosed with cancer or something else during her pregnancy, and she needs treatment that would either harm or end the pregnancy? Is an abortion justified in that case?
To be honest, I’ve never really thought about that. Not sure what I'd say.🙄
🤔If it's a fast-moving disease, like she'd die before the pregnancy even finishes, then you'd have to go with the treatment and just deal with whatever happens next.
I don't know... I think I'm for the mother getting treated...
But now you've got me thinking about another thing I don't really have a solid take on: childbirth. Like when you have to choose between the mother's life or the baby's—those cases exist, at least in movies. 🙄 In that scenario, the baby is already capable of living on its own. Still don't have a real opinion on that one either.🙄