Daniel Bailey7 said:Wait, who was he even asking? Some organizer or just some random punk passing by? 🤔
It's all the same thing. 😈
On topic.It’s the age-old debate in every art form—does the work stand alone, or do you need to know the artist and their backstory to actually get it? At the end of the day, someone's worldview and lifestyle bleed into everything they make, so looking into the background isn't even illogical. It kind of explains why people are so obsessed with sharing the same perspective as the creator.
That's my take.
I can't even deal with this right now. Total joke. Film bios were huge for me back in my punk teen days. I was obsessed with finding people who "got" me, thinking nobody outside my little scene could ever understand my worldview. Total amateur move. Later on, I realized how wrong I was—staying in that bubble just meant I was missing out on everything.
I don't even know what that means. Get it together. Honestly, I've just stopped giving a damn about the world.
Honestly, I still have this moral code that kicks in, making me refuse to even give certain things a shot. It’s about this:
Say, if some artist comes along whose music absolutely destroys you, but they’re out there openly pushing Nazism or violence against women, would you still keep them on repeat?
I think there’s a massive difference between a band "selling out" to a major label and someone openly pushing Nazi rhetoric, sexism, xenophobia, or any other kind of hateful bullshit that goes against everything I stand for. That’s why "sellout" punks still get played on my stereo, while guys like Thompson and Corba couldn't touch my playlist if they tried—even if their music actually sounded good. You’ve gotta draw the line somewhere.