@ redowl90 --yeah, honestly, an Oscar nomination is my cue to skip a movie. Whenever I see someone sweep a mountain of Oscars, my first thought is usually that there’s something fundamentally wrong with the film itself.
@Zachary Gomez9/">@
@Zachary Gomez9 :
As for Ray---like I said, the movie was just meh. It was mediocre with a spectacularly underwhelming ending. There were moments where I was just bored out of my mind watching it. The lead actor was so incredibly grating—he could easily land in my top 10 most unlikable actors of all time. The relationships between the characters felt shallow and totally naive.
What really bugs me is how Jamie Foxx played Ray--he basically "stripped" Ray down to his public persona. Sure, he nailed the public face, but I just can't buy that this "public" Ray is the same guy as the "private" Ray. To me, it feels like everything Jamie did was just a surface-level performance. When you watch a biopic, I expect it to dig into those deeper, hidden layers of the protagonist's character that aren't immediately obvious...
The direction? A total disaster. It felt like they took one ridiculously long Ray concert, changed his outfit a couple of times, swapped locations, and sprinkled in some superficial, shallow snapshots from his life. And they call that an autobiographical film?🙄
The absolute peak of the film's naivety is the ending--the guy has been shooting up since he could walk, and suddenly, in a dream, he reconciles with his dead brother and mother, and they tell him: "Don't ever let us down, Ray," they all share a big hug, and then—poof—it's over: "...and Ray never used drugs again." Yeah, right.🙄 and they all lived happily ever after.
So yeah... I think it's just a mediocre, forgettable movie that doesn't deserve half the hype it got.
And regarding Ray vs. The Aviator, I still think The Aviator—which is easily Scorsese's worst film, even compared to stuff about New York gangs—is still a hundred times better than Ray, which is probably the best film that specific guy has ever had made about him, regardless of the director.
For me, the great musical biopic from '98 is "Why Do Fools Fall in Love?" That movie is fun, breezy, and actually engaging, unlike Ray--and frankly, I find it hard to believe that one-hit wonder Frankie Lymon had a more interesting life than the real Ray Charles.
p.s. As for the music in the film... well, obviously it's going to be great when it's the original Ray tracks. If this were a movie with a brilliantly curated soundtrack (like Pulp Fiction, for example), I'd say something else. But since this is a movie *about* Ray, it feels a bit silly to point out the music as a special "plus" of the film... if you know what I mean, because it's not like some specialized team was brought in to record a custom score for it.