Posts by Austin Roberts8

I’ve got the whole film right here—feel free to chop it up however you want...

Fine, I’ll play your game. If you want to answer my points with nothing but a bunch of circular, useless questions, let's go. What exactly is "justice" to you? Who gets to decide? Who’s sitting in judgment? Is that judge actually fair or objective? And what’s the point of punishment anyway—is it about retribution, rehabilitation, or just a way to scare others into staying in line?
You completely missed the point of the example I gave. If the death penalty were an actual institutional reality, there would be some kind of psychological deterrent in place for everyone—including the occasional psycho. You’re obsessing over the actions of one psycho as if we have fifty of them running around every single day committing mass murders together. That’s a terrible argument because you're generalizing based on an event that happens once in a blue moon.
I’ve said it five thousand times already: you CANNOT punish him. The scale of his crimes is simply beyond the scope of any legal punishment. His death isn't a sentence; it's just removing a sick individual from the face of the earth.
I’m not even going to touch that last part because you clearly read it in some sociology textbook that sounds great on paper but fails miserably in the real world. And describing revenge as this infinite cycle is just pure stupidity. If you kill my sister, I kill you, and that’s that—it’s over.
As for your first question, the answer is that it depends. Depending on how massive the crime was, it could be all three of those things or just one. It all comes down to the scale of what they did.

Look, I’m all for the death penalty—not against it. A maniac doesn't care about what the law says because, well, he’s a maniac. Like I said before, punishing him specifically doesn't achieve much. That sentence is there to set an example for everyone else. And hey, if even a maniac realizes exactly what's coming for him, maybe he'll actually seek help. Whatever he did, it’s good for him to have this buried in his subconscious—that he's going to face an execution or whatever for his actions. Plus, the death penalty provides some level of closure for the families. An eye for an eye, teeth for a tooth.

Look, you can't even compare Slobodan Maddox to Saddam Hussein. Maddox died an innocent man. Saddam Hussein? He deserved what he got at that execution. You just can't punish people like that—what you’re talking about isn't justice, it's just pure revenge. That kind of punishment doesn't fit into any civilized legal system. Honestly, he just needed to be wiped off the face of the earth so we'd have one less lunatic to deal with.

I don't get why people view punishment as some way to "get back" at an individual for breaking the law or doing something shady. Punishment should actually function as a deterrent—something to make everyone else pause and think twice before they pull something stupid. Honestly, I also think the death penalty is fine, mostly because it isn't even really a "punishment" in the traditional sense. Capital punishment serves a different purpose: making the world a better place. When you have some serial maniac who rapes 50 women or kills 25 kids, there is no amount of prison time that actually fits the crime. At that point, you just move to the method of removing them entirely to improve society—one less savage out there means one less chance for them to breed more of the same. I can't stand that pathetic, sappy crap about how "everyone deserves a second chance" and why the death penalty is wrong. That’s just pure illusion and cliché nonsense peddled by people who let mass media dictate their views because they lack any actual backbone or independent thought. For certain types of people, rehabilitation is a myth and the whole concept of standard punishment is useless.

The only issue with Dustin Hoffman is that he basically plays the same twitchy, high-strung guy in every single movie. It’s like he’s just playing that one nervous lawyer from a rogue jury over and over again. Honestly, I'm not a fan of Dustin Hoffman—he just doesn't seem to have that transformative range...

Back in the day, people in the Old East used spices to actually make food taste good—not just mask the flavor. They were brought over to Europe by the legendary Marco Polo himself. And honestly? Those old-school spices actually did you some good. That’s a fact. Nowadays, you basically have two categories of seasoning: the chili-style stuff and the "all-in-one" synthetic powders. Anything truly natural has its own perks if you don't go overboard—because let's be real, even breathing too much oxygen can kill you at a certain point. Natural spices have ingredients that can actually benefit you, kind of like how red wine works. But those mass-produced powders? They're loaded with a thousand different additives. Some of those chemicals are carcinogenic, which means they bump up your risk—they don't necessarily cause it, there's a distinction there—of developing cancer. This category includes things like electrolyte drink powders, canned soups, and all that other bagged crap. Stick to the clean stuff. My personal go-tos: ginger, cayenne, chili, cloves, cumin, etc. Just find a local butcher shop that carries a decent spice selection.

Valium and similar antidepressants