Gerald Jackson48 said:Sure, the painting exists—but Malevich's work isn't music.
🙏🙏
What kind of logic is this even supposed to be?
287 posts shown.
Gerald Jackson48 said:Sure, the painting exists—but Malevich's work isn't music.
Lisa Davis46 said:even with zero budget or atonality, you can still feel the human touch in the work.
Lisa Davis46 said:I wouldn't say I know Four Tet that well...
just from a few mixes, Burial, and Massive Attack.
Lisa Davis46 said:you guys seen Planet Earth? 🙏
Lisa Davis46 said:Nah, she wouldn't eat this bird for breakfast—if that was even the point.
Ashley Grant66 said:Fine, but throw some more Dogbowl-style stuff my way😁
Mark Cruz15 said:You're spot on about the band—totally slipped my mind.
That whole scene with the kids is probably the most pathetic part of the movie. It just doesn't hold water unless they were hypnotized or had their brains totally scrubbed—doing it just because it was "trending" is ridiculous.
Mark Cruz15 said:For me, the vibe was the biggest standout—honestly one of the best atmospheres I've seen. There are tons of loaded scenes about how technology alienates people. Even though 2001 wasn't as hyper-connected as today, there were already people glued to early internet forums or gaming, so this captures the zeitgeist perfectly.
Ashley Grant66 said:Anyway, anyone else got theories on that whole voice purification thing? I know we shouldn't take the movie literally, but I'm curious. 😁
Steven Newman50 said:Dogtooth, Lobster, Her.
Steven Newman50 said:IMDB
Watched it... Fine. It’s an obvious satire on how pop culture drives youth trends—where technology is the thing that actually dehumanizes and alienates us.
Steven Newman50 said:It wasn't bad, but I didn't find it convincing. I think there are better movies out there covering the same themes.