My mistake. 🙂 But this crashing issue is intermittent, isn't it? What I suggested is actually a solid workaround for those specific moments when it fails. 🤷
Just configure any browser to clear your cookies upon exit. Once you step away from the computer and close the window, your username won't be visible to anyone. You just have to remember to actually close the browser.
If that's what you're asking, because this thread seems to be about something else entirely.😁
Online? At an American bank? I find that hard to believe. When I opened mine, I was required to provide a Social Security number and proof of employment.
Well, now we have Microsoft Outlook for business too, so there’s a new variable in play 😁. I'm stepping out because I don't follow your logic 😁, but I'll ask for someone else who might actually understand 🤣 . For emails sent to example@example.com to arrive at both that address and example@yahoo.com, a forwarding rule must be enabled. Furthermore, the "leave a copy of the message on the server" option must be checked; otherwise, whoever connects first claims the email. Are you aware of that?
Perhaps Yahoo will grab all the mail now, though I am not certain since this is all quite unclear to me 😁 . Good luck 🙂.
Wait, you mentioned you receive emails on a private Yahoo account? That implies they're being forwarded from the corporate server. How were you accessing them previously—via Yahoo or directly through the office server? That's where the issue likely lies.
Go into your account settings, select Test account settings, and then copy the exact message you receive. Let me know "completed" if everything works, or paste the error code if it doesn't.
I've run into similar issues before, which forced me to learn the ropes. For instance, I use an AT&T email address, but when I'm out with my laptop, I often connect via different providers. In those scenarios, you have to adjust your settings so the outgoing mail server matches the network you're actually using—something like setting the incoming server to pop.att.net and the outgoing to mail.verizon.net.
I agree. We need an association that establishes realistic goals, likely most of those outlined by gogo80 and sick.am. Discussing the causes of the global financial crisis at this stage is utterly pointless, and calls for revolution are purely counterproductive.
I realized what sets me apart from most of you; perhaps that’s why I don't see ads (I use basic Internet Explorer without any fancy blockers)
My Display thread settings are configured so the latest post always appears on the first page (specifically, Linear - Newest first). This creates an issue with Google because it constantly drops me on the wrong page 😁. It sounds ridiculous, but it might be worth a shot 😁
Philosophical debates aside, I fail to see how bluemason3 and Ryan Gomez4 don't realize they could face legal action. Allowing moderators to permit advice that endangers health and lives is a massive liability. 😁
bluemason3, stop philosophizing and start using common sense. Imagine someone you care about is critically ill and seriously considering an alternative treatment promoted on this forum instead of going to a hospital. Would you go after the moderator who allowed it 😉? This isn't a matter of opinion; it's basic logic. You have to draw a line. No one is talking about all alternative medicine—just cancer treatment. With nothing else are the consequences of neglecting medical care so dramatic
Look, obviously there are all kinds of doctors out there, but that’s beside the point. My argument is that you need to protect yourselves as moderators and shield innocent patients from charlatans. Personally, I have nothing against alternative medicine and I even allow my patients to pursue it; I don't believe it causes harm—provided they actually listen to me. 😁
Ryan Gomez4 said:Well, I'm in construction. If a piece of scaffolding or a heavy beam falls on someone at my job site, the OSHA inspectors, safety officers, and the police are all over us instantly—even if nobody gets seriously hurt. But when a patient dies under a doctor's care? Nothing happens. The family might try a private lawsuit, but most of the time, it goes nowhere. So, before you start lecturing anyone about accountability, maybe start taking responsibility for your own actions first.
Ryan Gomez4, I hope you're joking. 😁
What are the odds that life doesn't end in death? Zero. Doctors don't go around killing people; they simply use the tools they have to provide the best care possible. When it comes to cancer treatment, those tools eventually run out. It’s perfectly reasonable for people to look into alternative medicine because hope is a powerful thing. But believe me, I've seen it happen: once a patient abandons standard care for an alternative method and the family disagrees, that same family will sue everyone in sight once the patient passes—regardless of how terminal the illness was. People accept death under a doctor, but they won't accept it under an alternative practitioner. That's the reality.
It doesn't matter what "they" have to say. Any suggestion to abandon mainstream medicine should be sanctioned immediately, so no one even considers it. The moment something proves more effective than mainstream medicine for cancer treatment, then—and only then—is it acceptable to promote it.
This reminds me of the issues we faced at the Department of Commerce regarding Forex, back before we banned covert advertising and started issuing instant bans. Now, the discussions surrounding Forex are civilized, intelligent, and free from those who prey on human stupidity.
As a medical professional, I have one piece of advice for the moderators of Alternative: never, under any circumstances, allow someone to advise others to abandon conventional medicine, lest they face legal repercussions. That choice belongs solely to the patient and their family. If they wish to supplement conventional medicine with midnight-harvested dew, so be it. However, anyone claiming that such dew can cure them—or insisting they quit conventional treatments in favor of it—should be banned immediately and their post deleted.