Generic ink cartridges vs. refillable ink?
in Computer Peripherals ·
Carl Sullivan22 said:Why call it a bad investment? From a user's perspective, it’s simple: it either works or it doesn't. If it breaks, you try to fix it, but if it's beyond repair, it’s like any other printer—you just buy a new one instead of wasting money on repairs...
It's not about that. Just tell me how much that printer would actually cost, okay?
You're paying for premium ink here, meaning the top-tier stuff that actually works. 50 ml per color equals $23 per color.
I just doubt there's enough ink. If you're saying it uses some kind of chip, and probably an RF chip like HP since they follow the same lazy design school, you can bet on that.
Now hopefully you see why this is a dead end. Kodak basically killed its own future by doing it this way. Take Brother, for example—they're smarter. They have cartridges without chips. It's obvious Kodak messed up from the jump because they were being greedy. By slamming the door on refills, they pretty much sealed their fate.
That's why investing in this printer is a total joke. That's probably why you see them on clearance for pennies...
Which is exactly why you're asking the question in the first place.
Look, if you actually want to make a profit and print high-quality color cheaply, stick to Epson + Colibri replacement cartridges + Magnetic or Colibri or Premium KMP ink for refills. Don't go looking for trouble.