darkowl12 said:How many copies can you actually get out of those cheap MF inkjet printers before they die? From what I've read online, the feedback isn't great. Or is it just your theory that they're ONLY meant for scanning and color stuff, while you need a laser for actual printing?
Are there any newer printers out there that hit that same sweet spot of quality and price as that HP LaserJet 1300?
Look, I'm not loaded, and I'm not blind either. That's why I'm asking around. I don't want anyone pulling the wool over my eyes.
Listen, manufacturers are sneaky. They act all sweet to win you over, circling you like a hungry cat at the door. They give you exactly what you ask for—all that love and attention. But once they've had their fill, you can basically tell them where to go until they come back with a new offer.
Just think about it.
What do you really want? All that "attention," or a ton of prints for your buck?
That inkjet is basically just a scanner, because that’s pretty much what you’re paying for. You just install some software that PRETENDS to be a copier and let the laser handle the heavy lifting.
Picture this: 3,000 - 4,000 prints == $200 - $77 vs. 1,000 - 1,500 == $350 - $150
That means you're paying 3x more for the same amount of work. == $1,050 - $450. If you spend that kind of cash, you could get 14,000 prints and a free HP LaserJet 1300 thrown in. Just go nuts with it.
So it's no wonder that little cat is rubbing against your legs every single morning.
Makes sense?