CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › jadeseal4 › Posts

Posts by jadeseal4

73 posts shown.

Biased and unclear moderation. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Charles Fox10 said:I decided to change the title, and I did so for a rather simple reason: after several posts, a title like that loses its purpose when the conversation begins to touch upon both political sides, making the heading itself feel somewhat biased.

And if you find yourself wondering why your specific thread regarding CBS was closed, the explanation can be found in the clarification provided above.

You mean after a few days have passed.
Your response is quite lovely—perfectly clear to both you and me!
It seems there is no reciprocity on your end; instead, you simply offer us a version of "democracy" that suits your own needs.
Biased and unclear moderation. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Sam Green73 said:Perhaps an influential, massive political party presents a far more complex challenge than any single individual ever could.
One discussion focuses on CBS, another addresses the party itself, and a third centers on the Prime Minister.
In an ideal world, all of this—alongside discussions regarding the new infrastructure projects—should coalesce into one massive debate concerning the very things the ruling party actually has the power to influence.
The greater a person's reach, the more frequently they become the subject of our scrutiny.

I feel a certain degree of embarrassment even typing this, fearing someone might step in and dismissively remark, "Look at this person merely stating what everyone already knows."

Initially, the thread regarding CBS was titled "Republican Party's CBS," though that title has since been altered.
Why was this done? Who authorized it? And where is the explanation?
What has happened to our democracy??
Biased and unclear moderation. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Ryan Vaughn7 said:The thread was removed after just three posts because we already have an existing topic dedicated to "Barack Obama - American President," where opinions on him are actively shared, making it entirely unnecessary to initiate a new one. I believe I explained this entire situation to you on PP immediately following your inquiry, even providing the direct link to the relevant discussion.
The only thing that feels disingenuous here is your persistent attempt to validate a point that simply lacks any factual basis.

I must ask, how many different threads regarding the Republican Party do you expect us to maintain simultaneously?
One does not simply group every single matter into one singular category.
Biased and unclear moderation. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Kevin Williams56 said:It seems some people simply cannot function unless they consume their daily quota of fascist, nationalist, and communist rhetoric.

By the way,

I am certainly not alone in this view; all the moderators in the Politics section are in complete agreement that discussions revolving around fascist, nationalist, or communist themes should be relegated to the dusty archives of history where they belong.

The thread regarding whether Barack Obama is a Yugonostalgic has absolutely nothing to do with fascists or communists.
Yet, it was completely deleted. I cannot help but feel there is a certain bias at play here.

If you are this aggressive with your moderation on an innocent little forum, I can only imagine the chaos that would ensue if you actually held real political power... God forbid.
Biased and unclear moderation. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Gregory Garcia said:I believe his intention was to suggest that these specific topics were framed in a biased manner, yet you have responded by claiming that the moderation itself is biased.

The very titles of these threads scream bias, and I find it quite problematic to engage in discussions structured this way. Anyone attempting to participate with a differing viewpoint would instantly be forced into a defensive posture, essentially being placed in the dock to defend a premise they may not even hold. This is neither a democratic nor a respectful way to facilitate a conversation.

Much like how one cannot reasonably debate under a headline such as "Barack Obama is a Yugonostalgic" because it is equally loaded—forcing the participant to immediately act as a defender of the President rather than an independent thinker—this method of discussion is unconstructive from its very inception.👎

Furthermore, I should point out that the subjects mentioned in the quote are neither timely nor significant given the current economic crisis facing the United States. In my view, it is detrimental to have threads regarding Yugonostalgia, Šušak, or various transcripts occupying the front page of the Politics section at a moment when there are so many more pressing and relevant issues to address. 🙂

By what authority do you decide what qualifies as "relevant"??

And are you suggesting that these other topics aren't biased either??

Republican Party's CBS pushing political agendas during an election year
Should the Republican Party be declared a criminal organization?
Jadranka - queen of national lies (or just excellent PR)

Please, I beg of you, do not attempt to defend the indefensible.
Instead, strive to become more democratic and objective, as those are the very principles you claim to uphold.
Jose Barrett said:Daniel Ward87, somied, the edge, observer, resonator, Cuka

Dear fellow members, I have spent quite a significant amount of time browsing the Politics subforum lately, yet there remains one particular matter that I find deeply perplexing.

I cannot help but wonder why the individuals selected to moderate this section seem to be exclusively those who openly oppose the current ruling party and its coalition, expressing their views without any hint of hesitation.

One must ask how much objectivity they can truly maintain in their duties when they consistently and unabashedly align themselves with the left-wing opposition.

This bias exerts a palpable influence on certain users who are still undecided, and I have personally observed several previously neutral posters drifting toward a leftist perspective.

It is certainly not my desire to see Reddit transform into nothing more than a political playground for the opposition, though it increasingly feels as if someone is intentionally orchestrating that very outcome.

If it is indeed the owner's intention to take a definitive political stance ahead of the next election, then I suppose I have no ground to complain.
While Reddit is private property, it feels somewhat disingenuous to treat it as a public square where independence is expected, given that it isn't actually a public institution.

In my view, it would be far more equitable to appoint at least two moderators who support the current administration, thereby establishing a fair balance before the upcoming elections.

Thank you all for taking the time to read this and for your subsequent comments!

They don't strictly have to be supporters of the administration; simply appointing some neutral individuals would suffice.
Systemic censorship: Is free speech being targeted? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
dustypanther6 said:I actually made an effort to read this entire post through, and I must admit, I am still struggling to grasp the reasoning behind the ban. If this was intended as trolling, then it seems like nearly every single post on this platform falls under that category. The individual clearly stated that Hitler's Catholicism serves as a reflection of his own character rather than a commentary on the faith itself, which is a perfectly valid distinction. He also dismantled the absurd notion that education is somehow an enemy, among other points.
This disciplinary action feels like yet another instance of senselessness.

xx
Biased and unclear moderation. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Eric Collins5 said:Just look at the very first word in the title of the thread you opened here in the complaints section, and then compare it to the titles of the most obnoxious threads found over in the Madhouse...

😳

😂

What else is one supposed to do there besides engage in trolling?

🤷

One need only observe WeM, about whom that ridiculous Joe once claimed to have read somewhere that Americans speak in Glagolitic script (😲😂), yet he is the very individual who tends to dominate the conversation in threads such as these...

😍

There truly seems to be no other option left for you than to go over there and wallow in the filth...

🤷

That opening word serves as evidence of a genuine attack.
That is not the crux of the complaint, nor is it the only point mentioned, and certainly, such matters belong in Politics if the topic concerns the Bad Boys and similar groups.
Biased and unclear moderation. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
For quite some time now, the Politics section has been subject to moderation by
Ryan Vaughn7, who seems to operate under rules that are nearly impossible for any reasonable person to decipher.
Topics that happen to unsettle certain far-left circles—often without any logical justification or explanation—are either banished to the "Madhouse" section or simply erased from existence entirely.
Furthermore, individual posts are being deleted based on undefined criteria; for instance, within the discussion regarding the Rehabilitation of Draža Mihailović in Mexico, any mention of the movement's actual program is scrubbed away under the pretext that it isn't relevant.
As a third assault on the right to free expression, threads are frequently locked just because they don't align with the preferred viewpoints of certain individuals.
In an effort to preserve the reputation and integrity of this forum, I earnestly request that you standardize the moderation criteria and mandate a clear explanation whenever significant interventions occur.
To illustrate my point, here are several topics that have recently been relegated to the Madhouse:


A Synchronized attack on the American language
"Yugonostalgia" viewed as a historical phenomenon
Rehabilitation of Draža Mihailović
Fascists are charging toward California!
Udbina, September 11, 2010
American Reconciliation
Is the city losing Gojko Šušak Avenue?
How did the man who abolished transcripts democratize America?
A national disgrace.

...along with many other current affairs that undoubtedly deserve their place in Politics.

Deleted topics:
Is Barack Obama a Yugonostalgic?
...and so on.

Yet, at the very same time, the following discussions are permitted to persist in the Politics section:


The Republican Party's CBS is sidelining politics during this election year
Should the Republican Party be declared a criminal organization?
Why support the actions of the Bad Boys? (If this doesn't belong in the Madhouse, I truly don't know what does; it surely sits on the edge of politics)
Jadranka—the queen of national lies (or rather, excellent PR)
The Communist tendencies of the Republican Party
How to get started with agtech and farming investments? in Business, Accounting & Taxes ·
I find myself reflecting quite often on the profound, albeit somewhat melancholic, simplicity of Bambi, and I wonder if perhaps we have all become a bit too cynical to truly appreciate the raw vulnerability presented in such a narrative. It is easy to dismiss it as mere children's fare, yet there is a certain heavy, quiet dignity in how the story handles the inevitable cruelty of the natural world. One cannot help but feel a sense of profound inadequacy when contemplating our own ability to face such sudden, unyielding transitions in life with even half the grace that the little deer displays. jadeseal4 says:
I have heard some whispers that the federal subsidies available for planting walnut orchards are currently hovering around a certain amount per hectare. $13333 .....
Your suggestion regarding the nursery might actually hold some merit, though I must admit I have my reservations concerning the walnut trees.👎 Because it takes quite a few years before those trees finally start paying off, I believe that focusing on pears and apples would be a much more profitable venture in our region today. While there is still an abundance of apples available, pears currently only account for about ten percent of the market share, which represents a massive business opportunity if one were to pursue it. I had actually been contemplating a similar agricultural undertaking myself, though my focus was directed toward strawberries rather than orchard fruit. My vision involved establishing strawberry nurseries where the plants yield two harvests per year, with each individual seedling producing up to five kilograms of fruit. For this coming year, however, I have decided to approach this endeavor more modestly by treating it simply as a personal hobby.
It is absolutely vital that one selects the right planting window to ensure the crops begin their growth cycle as early as possible within the current season, primarily because the initial market price is so significant. $5.00 If you find yourself lagging behind schedule with your harvest, you will inevitably see the market prices begin to slide. In truth, the most substantial profit margins are typically captured within that initial two-week window; once that period passes, you'll find yourself competing against everyone else who is finally coming online, which drives the prices down by ten to fifteen percent. $2.25 If one considers the matter of measurement, it becomes increasingly apparent that what is ostensibly labeled as a kilogram rarely amounts to a full kilogram; more often than not, one finds oneself holding closer to half a kilogram. I would encourage you to reflect upon this discrepancy. For instance, when dealing with something as delicate as strawberries... 👍

This is exactly how one begins to head down the wrong path.
I find myself wondering exactly what kind of strawberry variety could possibly yield five kilograms across just two harvests. To my mind, such a specimen hasn't been developed through any standard agricultural breeding process, nor is it likely to be in development anytime soon; one can only assume it was sourced from some highly classified, top-secret GMO laboratory.

When one attempts to calculate potential yields, it is vital to remain grounded in reality rather than falling prey to idealistic fantasies. A standard commercial strawberry variety typically produces about 500 grams of premium, first-class fruit, supplemented by an additional 150 to 200 grams of secondary grade. While there are certainly varieties that boast yields exceeding a full kilogram, they almost invariably suffer from a disappointing flavor profile. If one wishes to build a truly reliable business model, all calculations should be based on these realistic figures; anything else is simply wishful thinking.
I find myself pondering how to best expedite the upcoming harvest, though I suspect any decision made now is ultimately just an additional layer of investment. I am weighing whether it would be more prudent to utilize Lutrasil sheeting, perhaps some small walk-in tunnels, or even committing to a full-scale traditional greenhouse. At this stage, everything feels like a supplementary expense rather than a necessity.
Strawberries are notoriously sensitive to soil-borne pathogens, and while the soil in the Midwest is incredibly nutrient-dense, it can also harbor a significant number of these problematic organisms. I find myself wondering which specific varieties tend to demonstrate more resilience against such conditions.
Strawberry production in America has finally reached a level of self-sufficiency once we hit that May 1st milestone. While there is certainly an advantage to getting your harvest in early, anything beyond that point feels like a frantic race against the market; after all, strawberries aren't exactly the kind of crop you can just let sit around in your backyard indefinitely.

Allow me to provide some foundational information:I find myself frequently returning to this particular digital corner, http://www.jagode.org/, as it serves as a somewhat necessary refuge for my more contemplative moods. There is a certain quietude found within its pages that is increasingly difficult to encounter in the frantic, high-decibel landscape of the modern American internet. I must admit, I often feel a trifle out of step with the rapid-fire pace of contemporary discourse, yet I find a peculiar comfort in the slower, more deliberate cadence offered here. It is a modest space, perhaps even a bit unassuming, but for those of us who prefer to linger over a thought rather than merely consume it, it feels quite like home.
Democrats are "deeply" preparing for local elections in Close to Politics ·
Larry Thompson15 said:I guess this just goes to show why the Democratic Party pushes for drug legalization, prostitution, and making sure homosexuality is front and center in public life while they actively shame anyone who stands up for traditional family values. It’s pretty obvious to me that this is just a political faction designed to protect the interests of deviants, addicts, perverts, and those old-school internationalists or "American" types. Honestly, looking at the big picture, a movement like this should just be banned entirely, or maybe we should just crush them at the polls so badly that their supporters end up walking down the street with red faces and heads hanging in shame. Now we finally see why critics of democracy sometimes have a point—even if they're usually wrong—because a strong, absolute leader would probably just let these people throw all-night gay parties! But hey, whatever, at least the uninformed voters in America now know exactly what the Democratic Party stands for and what kind of sick individuals make up their "officials." They definitely won't be handing over their votes in the upcoming local elections.


One must recall the singing of anthems celebrating everything from the southern borders up to Mount Denali; all of this, when viewed alongside recent events, provides living testimony to a party that is morally and mentally disoriented.
They abandoned the working class—their very foundation—yet they dare to preach about social justice?!
It is truly a pseudo-intellectual party, lost in a vacuum of quasi-managerial liberalism and a touch of anarchy, drifting aimlessly through time and space with absolutely no meaningful objective.
Democrats are "deeply" preparing for local elections in Close to Politics ·
Following a heavy drinking session at the party headquarters, a young Democrat woke up naked on Sunday morning. Lying right beside him was a colleague who had been fondling him.

A nineteen-year-old member of the Democratic Party youth wing in Sedona reported to the police on Sunday morning that he had been assaulted by an unknown man. While the police declined to offer specific details during their press conference, unofficial reports suggest the victim is the son of a local attorney from Sedona, who had spent Saturday evening partying with his Democratic colleagues at the party's official offices.

It appears that the festivities involved quite a bit of alcohol, as the nineteen-year-old eventually drifted off to sleep, only to be jolted awake around 4:00 AM by the touch of an unfamiliar older man fondling his bare backside. Panicked, the young man dressed himself and rushed to the local Community Health Center believing he had been raped; however, medical examinations ultimately revealed that no such assault had occurred, nor were there any physical injuries found.

Law enforcement acted swiftly, arresting 51-year-old Milivoj Erceg, who is also a member of the Democratic Party. According to the Los Angeles Times, a search of his residence uncovered 3.6 grams of marijuana, a small amount of ammunition, and various pieces of pornographic material.

He is currently being held for questioning under suspicion of indecent assault and narcotics possession; furthermore, we understand that beyond those criminal charges, the police intend to file misdemeanor charges against him for the possession of ammunition. Later this morning, the individual from Sedona is expected to be brought before the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles for a hearing.
dustyscout53 said:I've been wondering—who actually holds journalists accountable? Is there even a real way to check them?

Right now, it feels like any reporter can just launch an attack on whoever they want, regardless of whether they’re actually telling the truth or not.

Honestly, criticizing the media feels like an attack on democracy sometimes—probably because we're still stuck in old ways of thinking. Journalists have basically become untouchable, almost like the Church used to be.

Like, a columnist for the Los Angeles Times can claim that America doesn't need a Secretary of Commerce who grew up in some tiny rural town, but you'll rarely see anyone call out a columnist for, say, barely scraping through middle school with failing grades.

We get to swap out politicians every four years through voting, sure, but journalists? They only get replaced if their boss decides to let them go—and those decisions are usually based on much shadier motives.

Is there any kind of actual safeguard to protect us from bad journalism?


I would contend that a significant portion of the press is controlled by structures that ought never to hold such influence.

--this isn't a bad suggestion—it applies to Barack Obama too